FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034331316> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034331316 endingPage "381" @default.
• W2034331316 startingPage "376" @default.
• W2034331316 abstract "Background Malnutrition is common in older adults and early and appropriate nutrition intervention can lead to positive quality of life and health outcomes. Objective The purpose of our study was to determine the concurrent validity of several malnutrition screening tools and anthropometric parameters against validated nutrition assessment tools in the long-term-care setting. Study design This work was a cross-sectional, observational study. Participants/setting Older adults (aged >55 years) from two long-term-care facilities were screened. Main outcomes Nutrition screening tools used included the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), and the Simplified Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire. Nutritional status was assessed by Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), body mass index (BMI), corrected arm muscle area, and calf circumference. Residents were rated as either well nourished or malnourished according to each nutrition assessment tool. Statistical analysis A contingency table was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the nutrition screening tools and objective measures in detecting patients at risk of malnutrition compared with the SGA and MNA. Results One hundred twenty-seven residents (31.5% men; mean age 82.7±9 years, 57.5% high care) consented. According to SGA, 27.6% (n=31) of residents were malnourished and 13.4% were rated as malnourished by MNA. MST had the best sensitivity and specificity compared with the SGA (sensitivity 88.6%, specificity 93.5%, κ=0.806), followed by MNA-SF (85.7%, 62%, κ=0.377), MUST (68.6%, 96.7%, κ=0.703), and Simplified Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (45.7%, 77.2%, κ=0.225). Compared with MNA, MNA-SF had the highest sensitivity of 100%, but specificity was 56.4% (κ=0.257). MST compared with MNA had a sensitivity of 94.1%, specificity 80.9% (κ=0.501). The anthropometric screens ranged from κ=0.193 to 0.468 when compared with SGA and MNA. Conclusions MST, MUST, MNA-SF, and the anthropometric screens corrected arm muscle area and calf circumference have acceptable concurrent validity compared with validated nutrition assessment tools and can be used to triage nutrition care in the long-term-care setting." @default.
• W2034331316 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034331316 creator A5047791060 @default.
• W2034331316 creator A5048401047 @default.
• W2034331316 creator A5056444608 @default.
• W2034331316 creator A5087761323 @default.
• W2034331316 date "2012-03-01" @default.
• W2034331316 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2034331316 title "Beyond Malnutrition Screening: Appropriate Methods to Guide Nutrition Care for Aged Care Residents" @default.
• W2034331316 cites W1578200161 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W1824929487 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W1917015190 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2001246541 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2011769683 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2012791730 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2022858141 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2023003946 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2031663686 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2045346757 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2047413134 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2048770026 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2050252610 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2057836754 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2060305617 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2063773045 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2065491381 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2073430561 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2082006560 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2086580652 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2102688675 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2107826281 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2122613011 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2133488558 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2146388586 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2149935039 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2154015476 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2161412155 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2162132296 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2166898714 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2168700177 @default.
• W2034331316 cites W2799879545 @default.
• W2034331316 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.038" @default.
• W2034331316 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22717197" @default.
• W2034331316 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2034331316 type Work @default.
• W2034331316 sameAs 2034331316 @default.
• W2034331316 citedByCount "88" @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162012 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162013 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162014 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162015 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162016 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162017 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162018 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162019 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162020 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162021 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162022 @default.
• W2034331316 countsByYear W20343313162023 @default.
• W2034331316 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034331316 hasAuthorship W2034331316A5047791060 @default.
• W2034331316 hasAuthorship W2034331316A5048401047 @default.
• W2034331316 hasAuthorship W2034331316A5056444608 @default.
• W2034331316 hasAuthorship W2034331316A5087761323 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C551997983 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C61427482 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C91998498 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C105795698 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C126322002 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C142052008 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C142724271 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C159110408 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C187212893 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C23131810 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C2779951463 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C2780221984 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C33923547 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C551997983 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C61427482 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C71924100 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C74909509 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C91998498 @default.
• W2034331316 hasConceptScore W2034331316C99454951 @default.
• W2034331316 hasIssue "3" @default.

• next