FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034395610> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034395610 endingPage "293" @default.
• W2034395610 startingPage "292" @default.
• W2034395610 abstract "Strength measures are often expressed as a ratio standard (RS = 1RM/kg) when comparing individuals of differing body masses and genders. Evidence suggests that this method may disproportionally penalize heavier individuals. Allometric modeling (AM = 1RM/BMa) has been used in place of simple ratio standards in order to normalize distribution of raw variables and eliminate disproportionalities. PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of allometric scaling for assessing the gender difference in bench press (BP) and squat (SQ) strength in adolescent weight trainers. METHODS: High school participants (men, n=50; age = 16.9 ± 0.7 yrs; women, n=24; age = 16.9 ± 0.9 yrs) performed 1RM BP and SQ prior to and following resistance training 4 times/wk for 8 wk. The standard touch-and-go method was employed for determining the 1RM BP. The 1RM SQ procedure required the bottom of the thigh to reach parallel with the floor. RESULTS: Men had significantly greater (p<0.001) absolute and relative BP (72.9 ± 16.6 kg and 0.95 ± 0.18 kg/kg) and SQ (110.2 ± 24.6 kg and 1.44 ± 0.26 kg/kg) than women (BP = 32.9 ± 6.7 kg and 0.53 ± 0.08 kg/kg; SQ = 51.5 ± 9.8 kg and 0.85 ± 0.17 kg/kg, respectively). Linear regression of log-transformed values indicated no significant gender interaction for either BP or SQ. The common mass exponents was 0.75 for BP (95% C.I. = 0.50 to 0.99) and 0.67 for SQ (95% C.I. = 0.40 to 0.94). The correlations between body mass and the scaled values for BP and SQ were near zero for men (-0.08 and 0.07, respectively) but slightly higher for women (0.13 and -0.27, respectively). The proportionality constants for each gender for BP and SQ indicated that adolescent men were approximately 1.9 times stronger than adolescent women both before and after training. There was no significant difference in the increase in RS and AM or between genders for BP. For SQ, there was no significant difference between RS and AM, but women made a greater gain than men. CONCLUSIONS: Allometric scaling for BP and SQ performance in adolescent may be more appropriate than ratio comparisons in active young men and women when assessing gender difference. The proportional difference between adolescent men and women is slightly greater than that previously noted when comparing college-aged men to women." @default.
• W2034395610 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034395610 creator A5000487854 @default.
• W2034395610 creator A5016238751 @default.
• W2034395610 creator A5036217453 @default.
• W2034395610 creator A5079061213 @default.
• W2034395610 creator A5087748278 @default.
• W2034395610 date "2010-05-01" @default.
• W2034395610 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2034395610 title "Allometric Modeling of Maximal Bench Press and Squat Strength in Adolescent Men and Women" @default.
• W2034395610 doi "https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000384412.82850.e6" @default.
• W2034395610 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2034395610 type Work @default.
• W2034395610 sameAs 2034395610 @default.
• W2034395610 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2034395610 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034395610 hasAuthorship W2034395610A5000487854 @default.
• W2034395610 hasAuthorship W2034395610A5016238751 @default.
• W2034395610 hasAuthorship W2034395610A5036217453 @default.
• W2034395610 hasAuthorship W2034395610A5079061213 @default.
• W2034395610 hasAuthorship W2034395610A5087748278 @default.
• W2034395610 hasBestOaLocation W20343956101 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C153026981 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C2777188771 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C2778820510 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C3019424981 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C48921125 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C105795698 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C140793950 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C144024400 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C149923435 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C153026981 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C1862650 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C18903297 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C2777188771 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C2778820510 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C3019424981 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C33923547 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C48921125 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C71924100 @default.
• W2034395610 hasConceptScore W2034395610C86803240 @default.
• W2034395610 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2034395610 hasLocation W20343956101 @default.
• W2034395610 hasOpenAccess W2034395610 @default.
• W2034395610 hasPrimaryLocation W20343956101 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W1998951189 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W2034395610 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W2080038634 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W2080280265 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W2094275094 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W2145152843 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W2807100743 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W2808038789 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W3168147345 @default.
• W2034395610 hasRelatedWork W4255134094 @default.
• W2034395610 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W2034395610 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2034395610 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2034395610 magId "2034395610" @default.
• W2034395610 workType "article" @default.