FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034669674> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034669674 endingPage "495" @default.
• W2034669674 startingPage "489" @default.
• W2034669674 abstract "Off-line, computer-aided prescription (simulator) and treatment (portal) image registration using chamfer matching has been implemented on PC based viewing station. The purposes of this study were (a) to evaluate the performance of interactive anatomy and field edge extraction and subsequent registration, and (b) to compare observer's perceptions of field accuracy with measured discrepancies following anatomical registration.Prescription-treatment image pairs for 48 different patients were examined in this study. Digital prescription images were produced with the aid of a television camera and a digital frame grabber, while the treatment images were obtained directly from an on-line portal imaging system. To facilitate perception of low contrast anatomical detail, on-line portal images were enhanced with selective adaptive histogram equalization prior to extraction of anatomical edges. Following interactive extraction of anatomical and field border information by an experienced observer, the identified anatomy was registered using chamfer matching. The degree of conformity between the prescription and treatment fields was quantified using several parameters, which included relative prescription field coverage and overcoverage, as well as the translational and rotational displacements as measured by chamfer matching applied to the boundaries of the two fields. These quantitative measures were compared with subjective evaluations made by four radiation oncologists.All the images in this series that included a range of the most commonly seen treatment sites were registered and the conformity parameters were found. The mean treatment/prescription field coverage and overcoverage were approximately 95 and 7%, respectively before registration. The mean translational displacement in the transverse and cranio-caudal directions were 2.9 and 3.4 mm, respectively. The mean rotational displacement was approximately 2 degrees. For all four oncologists, the portals classified as unacceptable, in terms of the field placement, exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.03) translational errors in the transverse direction. The field coverages were significantly lower (p < 0.05) and the translational errors in the cranio-caudal direction were significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the portals rated as unacceptable by two of the oncologists.From the parameters that were used to quantify the degree of conformity between the prescription and treatment fields, the translational error in the transverse direction correlated best with the oncologists' assessments on the field placement. Field coverage and translational error in the cranio-caudal direction correlated well with assessments of only two out of the four participating oncologists. This can be explained by the fact that for the majority of treatment sites included in the study the positioning of field borders was more critical for the transverse direction. A conclusion for the design of future quantitative and automated on-line portal verification systems is that they will have to model different perceived significances of different types of localization errors intrinsic to oncologist evaluation of portal images." @default.
• W2034669674 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034669674 creator A5015451141 @default.
• W2034669674 creator A5032571289 @default.
• W2034669674 creator A5061333446 @default.
• W2034669674 creator A5075668976 @default.
• W2034669674 creator A5090790643 @default.
• W2034669674 date "1996-01-01" @default.
• W2034669674 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2034669674 title "Quantitative VS. Subjective portal verification using digital portal images" @default.
• W2034669674 cites W1987766127 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W1999329929 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2003264830 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2004019741 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2017930778 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2042394469 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2059473774 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2072213949 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2089161511 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2094546788 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2105735591 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2160316752 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2232271406 @default.
• W2034669674 cites W2327859196 @default.
• W2034669674 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)02035-7" @default.
• W2034669674 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8567353" @default.
• W2034669674 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2034669674 type Work @default.
• W2034669674 sameAs 2034669674 @default.
• W2034669674 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2034669674 countsByYear W20346696742015 @default.
• W2034669674 countsByYear W20346696742020 @default.
• W2034669674 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034669674 hasAuthorship W2034669674A5015451141 @default.
• W2034669674 hasAuthorship W2034669674A5032571289 @default.
• W2034669674 hasAuthorship W2034669674A5061333446 @default.
• W2034669674 hasAuthorship W2034669674A5075668976 @default.
• W2034669674 hasAuthorship W2034669674A5090790643 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C165064840 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C166704113 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C2780704645 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C115961682 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C121332964 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C142724271 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C154945302 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C165064840 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C166704113 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C19527891 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C2780704645 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C31972630 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C41008148 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C62520636 @default.
• W2034669674 hasConceptScore W2034669674C71924100 @default.
• W2034669674 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2034669674 hasLocation W20346696741 @default.
• W2034669674 hasLocation W20346696742 @default.
• W2034669674 hasOpenAccess W2034669674 @default.
• W2034669674 hasPrimaryLocation W20346696741 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W1995188412 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W1995875282 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W2009466720 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W2011443206 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W2041698670 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W2114100766 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W2125070361 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W2203553948 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W2391245565 @default.
• W2034669674 hasRelatedWork W3163375306 @default.
• W2034669674 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2034669674 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2034669674 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2034669674 magId "2034669674" @default.
• W2034669674 workType "article" @default.