FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034690897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034690897 endingPage "808" @default.
• W2034690897 startingPage "797" @default.
• W2034690897 abstract "Accounts in the archaeological literature from 1898 onwards of the degradation and siltation of archaeological ditches, generally in the Chalk, are first briefly reviewed. These are often supported by a series of successive measured sections, showing a tendency for a convex outward profile to develop in the degraded rock face. This was termed as ‘trumpet-shaped’ profile by Curwen (Antiquity, 4 (1930) 97), but no theoretical models were proposed. In 1866, Fisher had put forward a theoretical, two-dimensional analysis of the degradation of a single cliff of chalk (a quarry face near Lewes, Sussex) and this work was later generalised by Lehmann (Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Zürich, 78 (1933) 83). A variant of this approach was published by Bakker and Le Heux (Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen, B 50 (1947) 959, 1154). These theoretical models seem first to have been referred to in an archaeological context by Jewell (A Report of the Research Committee on Archaeological Field Experiments for the British Association for the Advancement of Science, London: The British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1963) in connection with the reporting of the meticulously executed and recorded Experimental Earthwork in the Chalk of Overton Down, Wiltshire. At that time, however, no attempt was made to integrate the field measurements with the available cliff degradation theories. This initiative was taken by Hutchinson (Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 23 (1998) 913) in order to check the validity of the Fisher–Lehmann and Bakker–Le Heux models. For both these models, good agreement between the actual and predicted buried rock profiles was found for a single cliff in chalk. It is clear that in most archaeological ditches, there is mutual interference between the screes developing from the opposite faces. This alters the boundary conditions of the above-mentioned cases of cliff degradation. In this paper, new theoretical, two-dimensional models are developed to cover the main situations found. These were identified from a review of archaeological ditches in southern England and France, and are described as follows: Type I—Wide ditches, with no interference between the opposite screes. Type II—Trapezoidal ditches, with eventual interference between the opposite screes. Type III—Triangular ditches, with immediate interference between the opposite screes. For Type I, the existing models for a single cliff apply. For Types II and III, new models are presented. It should be noted that for Type II, degradation follows initially the Type I model, but switches to Type II when the toes of the opposing screes meet. This produces a point of discontinuity in the buried rock profile where a change of gradient occurs, giving rise to a ‘double trumpet’ shape. This may generally be too subtle a feature to be readily identified archaeologically. For a bulking factor of 1.67 (i.e. c=0.4), the predicted buried rock profiles for Types I, II and III are compared for two specific ditches. Dimensionless plots summarising the relationships between initial ditch face angle, ditch base width and the ultimate amount of ditch crest recession are also given for these three cases. Profiles for other geometries and bulking factors may readily be determined using the equations provided. These make no allowance for the ingress of debris from outside the ditch, for example, from the slope of a rampart, which would further steepen the profiles." @default.
• W2034690897 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034690897 creator A5062857966 @default.
• W2034690897 creator A5082899763 @default.
• W2034690897 date "2003-07-01" @default.
• W2034690897 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2034690897 title "Analyses of the morphological changes with time, through denudation and siltation, in ditches of trapezoidal and triangular section" @default.
• W2034690897 cites W1494517342 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W1502885407 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2028361215 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2030738819 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2095220075 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2167106164 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2306760049 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2324039568 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2333176586 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W2585856877 @default.
• W2034690897 cites W645446789 @default.
• W2034690897 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-4403(02)00241-8" @default.
• W2034690897 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2034690897 type Work @default.
• W2034690897 sameAs 2034690897 @default.
• W2034690897 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2034690897 countsByYear W20346908972012 @default.
• W2034690897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034690897 hasAuthorship W2034690897A5062857966 @default.
• W2034690897 hasAuthorship W2034690897A5082899763 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C156945495 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C164139821 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C206700591 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C2816523 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C112698675 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C114793014 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C127313418 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C144133560 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C156945495 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C164139821 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C166957645 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C187320778 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C206700591 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C2779343474 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C2780129039 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C2816523 @default.
• W2034690897 hasConceptScore W2034690897C95457728 @default.
• W2034690897 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2034690897 hasLocation W20346908971 @default.
• W2034690897 hasOpenAccess W2034690897 @default.
• W2034690897 hasPrimaryLocation W20346908971 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W1505363602 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W1539248293 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W2032103012 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W2034690897 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W2096769088 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W2329321929 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W2333540133 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W2349739385 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W2527095771 @default.
• W2034690897 hasRelatedWork W848243446 @default.
• W2034690897 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2034690897 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2034690897 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2034690897 magId "2034690897" @default.
• W2034690897 workType "article" @default.