FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034706870> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034706870 endingPage "293" @default.
• W2034706870 startingPage "285" @default.
• W2034706870 abstract "Background: The number of patients receiving augmentation mammaplasty is rapidly growing. Breast cancer will develop in a significant number of these women. Objective: The authors report on a series (expanding the size of a previous study by the senior author, S.L.S.), encompassing one surgeon's experience performing breast reconstruction in women who had undergone previous augmentation. They compare the stage and detection method in this series with other published studies and also review their experience with regard to the benefit of subpectoral versus subglandular implant placement. Methods: A retrospective review of the senior author's reconstructive practice was performed, including the period from July 1983 to July 2007. Thirty-two consecutive women were identified who had previously received augmentation mammaplasty, were subsequently diagnosed with cancer, and then underwent breast reconstruction. Types of reconstructive procedures and outcomes were evaluated. A statistical analysis of the results was performed with a standard 2-tailed t test and χ2 analysis. Results: The occurrence of breast cancer diagnosis after augmentation ranged from 1 to 25 years (mean, 15 years). No implants were ruptured at the time of mastectomy. Of the 16 patients with previous subpectoral augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in 12 (75%). Of the 16 patients with previous subglandular augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in 7 (44%). This difference was not statistically significant, but that may be related to the insufficient population size (P = .15). Twenty-two (69%) of the patients underwent a purely prosthetic reconstruction. Flaps were used in the other 10 (31%), including 5 (16%) latissimus dorsi flaps and 5 (16%) transverse rectus abdominis flaps. Nine (90%) of those 10 flaps were used in patients undergoing radiation therapy. There were 9 stage 0 (28.1%), 9 stage I (28.1%), 12 stage II (37.5%), and 2 stage III (6.3%) patients. Among the subglandular group, there were 5 stage 0 (31.3%), 2 stage I (12.5%), 7 stage II (43.8%), and 2 stage III (12.5%) patients. Among the subpectoral group, there were 4 stage 0 (25.0%), 7 stage I (43.8%), 5 stage II (31.3%), and no stage III or IV patients. There was no significant difference in the axillary status between the 2 implant location groups. Eleven of the total 32 (34%) patients were treated with radiation therapy. Of these patients, 2 received breast conservation therapy and the other 9 underwent mastectomy. Of the 11 augmented breasts that received radiation therapy, 9 had flaps used in their reconstruction, including 5 latissimus dorsi and 4 trans-rectus abdominis muscle flaps. The average length of follow-up for the entire group was 26.4 months (range, 1–109 months). Conclusions: A history of breast augmentation was demonstrated to have consequences for future management of cancer in the areas of detection, cancer management, and reconstruction options. In addition, it was shown that the site of implantation may have an effect on the effectiveness of breast imaging." @default.
• W2034706870 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034706870 creator A5000684834 @default.
• W2034706870 creator A5008339354 @default.
• W2034706870 creator A5091887796 @default.
• W2034706870 date "2008-05-01" @default.
• W2034706870 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2034706870 title "Considerations of Previous Augmentation in Subsequent Breast Reconstruction" @default.
• W2034706870 cites W1552474697 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W1966885409 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W1967328200 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W1992185645 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W1997339743 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W1998815635 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W1999986145 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2002668605 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2005205039 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2007234433 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2011974119 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2034326411 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2036934183 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2038620991 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2041107886 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2041566283 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2058100143 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2063255913 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2064223819 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2071474079 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2074962037 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2074973016 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2075632937 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2079678506 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2084991328 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2085355200 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2092463588 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2094351885 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2112516937 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2113676695 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2121877351 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2126310025 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2130746306 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2134086521 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2149321682 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2168517539 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2323984148 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2334745338 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2414652304 @default.
• W2034706870 cites W2461410435 @default.
• W2034706870 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2008.02.008" @default.
• W2034706870 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19083539" @default.
• W2034706870 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2034706870 type Work @default.
• W2034706870 sameAs 2034706870 @default.
• W2034706870 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702012 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702014 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702015 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702016 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702017 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702018 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702019 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702021 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702022 @default.
• W2034706870 countsByYear W20347068702023 @default.
• W2034706870 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034706870 hasAuthorship W2034706870A5000684834 @default.
• W2034706870 hasAuthorship W2034706870A5008339354 @default.
• W2034706870 hasAuthorship W2034706870A5091887796 @default.
• W2034706870 hasBestOaLocation W20347068701 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C2777757722 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C2780440149 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C2781001896 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C2781037480 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C121608353 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C126322002 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C141071460 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C167135981 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C2777757722 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C2780440149 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C2781001896 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C2781037480 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C2781411149 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C2908647359 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C530470458 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C61434518 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C71924100 @default.
• W2034706870 hasConceptScore W2034706870C99454951 @default.
• W2034706870 hasIssue "3" @default.

• next