Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034722499> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W2034722499 endingPage "38" @default.
- W2034722499 startingPage "21" @default.
- W2034722499 abstract "Abstract This study compared three judgment strategies used to determine composite performance ratings, based on information varied along three, six or nine dimensions, in a factorial design. College students (N = 270) rated written descriptions of the performance of hypothetical college instructors, using numerical rating scales and salary increase estimates. The entire procedure was repeated on two occasions. The three judgment strategies were compared in terms of intrarater reliability across occassions, intrarater convergence across rating methods, and interrater agreement, using both correlations and mean absolute deviations as dependent measures. The results based on mean absolute deviations supported the predicted overall superiority of the decomposed judgment strategy with combination by algorithm. The results based on correlations indicated that a simple holistic strategy was as effective as the decomposed judgement approach. Both sets of results indicated that a decomposed judgment strategy with combination by algorithm. The results based on correlations indicated that a simple holistic strategy was as effective as the decomposed judgment approach. Both sets of results indicated that a decomposed judgment strategy followed by a clinical overall evaluation is a particularly ineffective method for making performance evaluations. This finding has important implications since the decomposed—clinical strategy is similar to the approach often used in actual performance rating situations." @default.
- W2034722499 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2034722499 creator A5003680480 @default.
- W2034722499 creator A5046455179 @default.
- W2034722499 date "1982-02-01" @default.
- W2034722499 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2034722499 title "A comparison of holistic and decomposed judgment strategies in a performance rating simulation" @default.
- W2034722499 cites W1974717757 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W1977602123 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W1978280752 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W1986877079 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W1994393291 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W1995807293 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2012226742 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2018309201 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2021241794 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2029654180 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2057068159 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2059372149 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2068290483 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2073638619 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2083247026 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2083769633 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2101473505 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2113383833 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2162358421 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W2579555219 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W3125091230 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W4244134295 @default.
- W2034722499 cites W4362230040 @default.
- W2034722499 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(82)90240-9" @default.
- W2034722499 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
- W2034722499 type Work @default.
- W2034722499 sameAs 2034722499 @default.
- W2034722499 citedByCount "42" @default.
- W2034722499 countsByYear W20347224992012 @default.
- W2034722499 countsByYear W20347224992013 @default.
- W2034722499 countsByYear W20347224992017 @default.
- W2034722499 countsByYear W20347224992018 @default.
- W2034722499 countsByYear W20347224992021 @default.
- W2034722499 countsByYear W20347224992022 @default.
- W2034722499 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2034722499 hasAuthorship W2034722499A5003680480 @default.
- W2034722499 hasAuthorship W2034722499A5046455179 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C105795698 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C149782125 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C15744967 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C180747234 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C33923547 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C41008148 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C75630572 @default.
- W2034722499 hasConceptScore W2034722499C77805123 @default.
- W2034722499 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2034722499 hasLocation W20347224991 @default.
- W2034722499 hasOpenAccess W2034722499 @default.
- W2034722499 hasPrimaryLocation W20347224991 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W1966209529 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W1975430480 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W1981237115 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W1988185375 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W2008138827 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W2067443318 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W2166481065 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W2809777561 @default.
- W2034722499 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2034722499 hasVolume "29" @default.
- W2034722499 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2034722499 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2034722499 magId "2034722499" @default.
- W2034722499 workType "article" @default.