FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W203477775> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W203477775 endingPage "3307" @default.
• W203477775 startingPage "3302" @default.
• W203477775 abstract "To determine consumer sensory acceptance and value of branded, Argentine (grass-finished, aged 30+ d) and domestic (U.S. grain-finished beef, aged 9 d) strip loins were paired based on similar Warner-Bratzler shear force values (P = 0.34) and similar marbling levels (P = 0.82). Consumers in Chicago, IL, and San Francisco, CA (n = 124 per city), evaluated one pair of Argentine and domestic steaks, and had the opportunity to participate in a silent, sealed-bid auction to purchase steaks matching the taste panel samples. Consumers were categorized into three groups based on overall acceptability ratings: 1) those who found Argentine steaks more acceptable, 2) those who found domestic steaks more acceptable, and 3) those who were indifferent. Consumers rated domestic steaks higher (P < 0.05) in juiciness, tenderness, flavor, and overall acceptability. Consumers in both Chicago and San Francisco were willing to pay more (P < 0.05) for domestic steaks (0.86 dollars and 0.52 dollars per 0.45 kg, respectively). In both cities, consumers who found Argentine samples more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.05) for Argentine steaks (0.74 dollars per 0.45 kg in Chicago and 1.82 dollars per 0.45 kg in San Francisco), and consumers who found domestic samples more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.05) for domestic steaks (1.66 dollars per 0.45 kg in Chicago and 1.34 dollars per 0.45 kg in San Francisco). Consumers who were indifferent were willing to pay similar (P = 0.99) amounts for Argentine and domestic steaks. Although some consumers found Argentine beef more acceptable than domestic beef (19.7 and 16.5% in Chicago and San Francisco, respectively) and were willing to pay more for it, most consumers found domestic beef to be more acceptable (59.0% in Chicago and 61.5% in San Francisco) and were willing to pay more to obtain a more acceptable product." @default.
• W203477775 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W203477775 creator A5021806436 @default.
• W203477775 creator A5040770611 @default.
• W203477775 creator A5045404299 @default.
• W203477775 creator A5059928963 @default.
• W203477775 creator A5080057811 @default.
• W203477775 date "2004-11-01" @default.
• W203477775 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W203477775 title "A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program1,2" @default.
• W203477775 cites W134358597 @default.
• W203477775 cites W1500199958 @default.
• W203477775 cites W1548337883 @default.
• W203477775 cites W167793575 @default.
• W203477775 cites W2015007620 @default.
• W203477775 cites W2024472071 @default.
• W203477775 cites W2030008891 @default.
• W203477775 cites W2045744500 @default.
• W203477775 cites W2051224161 @default.
• W203477775 cites W2124713638 @default.
• W203477775 cites W2558534370 @default.
• W203477775 cites W339741165 @default.
• W203477775 doi "https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82113302x" @default.
• W203477775 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15542477" @default.
• W203477775 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W203477775 type Work @default.
• W203477775 sameAs 203477775 @default.
• W203477775 citedByCount "59" @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752012 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752013 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752014 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752015 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752016 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752017 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752018 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752019 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752020 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752021 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752022 @default.
• W203477775 countsByYear W2034777752023 @default.
• W203477775 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W203477775 hasAuthorship W203477775A5021806436 @default.
• W203477775 hasAuthorship W203477775A5040770611 @default.
• W203477775 hasAuthorship W203477775A5045404299 @default.
• W203477775 hasAuthorship W203477775A5059928963 @default.
• W203477775 hasAuthorship W203477775A5080057811 @default.
• W203477775 hasBestOaLocation W2034777752 @default.
• W203477775 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W203477775 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W203477775 hasConcept C2780003869 @default.
• W203477775 hasConcept C37621935 @default.
• W203477775 hasConcept C7150383 @default.
• W203477775 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W203477775 hasConceptScore W203477775C140793950 @default.
• W203477775 hasConceptScore W203477775C144133560 @default.
• W203477775 hasConceptScore W203477775C2780003869 @default.
• W203477775 hasConceptScore W203477775C37621935 @default.
• W203477775 hasConceptScore W203477775C7150383 @default.
• W203477775 hasConceptScore W203477775C86803240 @default.
• W203477775 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W203477775 hasLocation W2034777751 @default.
• W203477775 hasLocation W2034777752 @default.
• W203477775 hasLocation W2034777753 @default.
• W203477775 hasLocation W2034777754 @default.
• W203477775 hasOpenAccess W203477775 @default.
• W203477775 hasPrimaryLocation W2034777751 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W1975749723 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W1995591680 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W2045099483 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W2064975685 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W2413469294 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W255922108 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W2955479198 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W3007945173 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W3012955178 @default.
• W203477775 hasRelatedWork W2186766158 @default.
• W203477775 hasVolume "82" @default.
• W203477775 isParatext "false" @default.
• W203477775 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W203477775 magId "203477775" @default.
• W203477775 workType "article" @default.