FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034862065> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2034862065 endingPage "148" @default.
• W2034862065 startingPage "134" @default.
• W2034862065 abstract "While efforts to meet international commitments to counter biodiversity declines by establishing networks of marine protected areas (MPAs) continue, assessments of MPAs rarely take into account measures of effectiveness of different categories of protection, or other design principles (size, spacing, governance considerations). We carried out a meta-analysis of ecological effectiveness of IUCN Categories I–II (no-take), IV and VI (MPAs) compared to unprotected areas. We then applied our ecological effectiveness estimates – the added benefit of marine protection over and above conventional fisheries management – to a gap analysis of existing MPAs, and MPAs proposed by four indigenous groups on the Central Coast of British Columbia, Canada. Additionally, we assessed representation, size, spacing, and governance considerations against MPA design criteria outlined in the literature. We found significant differences in response ratios for IUCN Categories IV and VI MPAs compared to no-take reserves and areas open to fishing, although variability in responses was high. By rescaling the predicted ecological effectiveness ratios (including confidence estimates), we found that, compared to no-take reserves (biodiversity conservation effectiveness 100%) and open fishing areas (0% additional biodiversity contribution over and above conventional fisheries management), IUCN Category IV had a predicted effectiveness score of 60%, ranging between 34% and 89% (95% lower and upper confidence intervals, respectively), and IUCN Category VI had a predicted effectiveness score of 24% (ranging between −12% and 72% for the 95% lower and upper confidence intervals, respectively). We found that the existing MPAs did poorly when compared against most MPA design criteria, whereas the proposed MPA network achieved many of the best practices identified in the literature, and could achieve all if some additional sites were added. By using the Central Coast of British Columbia as a case study, we demonstrated a method for applying empirically-based ecological effectiveness estimates to an assessment of MPA design principles for an existing and proposed network of MPAs." @default.
• W2034862065 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2034862065 creator A5011279213 @default.
• W2034862065 creator A5011326500 @default.
• W2034862065 creator A5038244437 @default.
• W2034862065 creator A5080432846 @default.
• W2034862065 creator A5084857767 @default.
• W2034862065 date "2014-12-01" @default.
• W2034862065 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2034862065 title "Applying empirical estimates of marine protected area effectiveness to assess conservation plans in British Columbia, Canada" @default.
• W2034862065 cites W1553161969 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W1560987312 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W1996339063 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2018812378 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2020530955 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2030529329 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2036704257 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2041342278 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2048166657 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2050958304 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2062320332 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2065780997 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2071224479 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2074718180 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2076312484 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2085936754 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2091257268 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2102728331 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2103844417 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2105622624 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2108579795 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2111124387 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2114363971 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2118007037 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2121052692 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2122226557 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2136896529 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2139168999 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2144104419 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2145725211 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2146199767 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2151866409 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2153639031 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2161755832 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W2163451848 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W3021010652 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W4211243502 @default.
• W2034862065 cites W83141191 @default.
• W2034862065 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.037" @default.
• W2034862065 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2034862065 type Work @default.
• W2034862065 sameAs 2034862065 @default.
• W2034862065 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652015 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652016 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652017 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652018 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652019 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652020 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652021 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652022 @default.
• W2034862065 countsByYear W20348620652023 @default.
• W2034862065 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2034862065 hasAuthorship W2034862065A5011279213 @default.
• W2034862065 hasAuthorship W2034862065A5011326500 @default.
• W2034862065 hasAuthorship W2034862065A5038244437 @default.
• W2034862065 hasAuthorship W2034862065A5080432846 @default.
• W2034862065 hasAuthorship W2034862065A5084857767 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C113416529 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C120860951 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C202041845 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C207769581 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C43827410 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C505870484 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C514101110 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C68800169 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C105795698 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C107826830 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C113416529 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C120860951 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C130217890 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C185933670 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C18903297 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C202041845 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C205649164 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C207769581 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C33923547 @default.
• W2034862065 hasConceptScore W2034862065C39432304 @default.

• next