Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2034865366> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2034865366 endingPage "69" @default.
- W2034865366 startingPage "57" @default.
- W2034865366 abstract "Cardiovascular reactivity is the change in blood pressure, pulse, and other parameters of cardiovascular function in response to a challenging task. During the conduct of cardiovascular reactivity protocols, researchers frequently use automated blood pressure devices to measure blood pressure reactivity. However, the accuracy of automated devices in measuring blood pressure reactivity is unknown. To investigate the accuracy and precision of the Dinamap 1846 SXP and the VitaStat 2600B in the measurement of blood pressure reactivity, we compared blood pressure reactivity recorded by the VitaStat and Dinamap with that obtained by observers using a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer. At three sites, 159 normotensive subjects performed the same task twice, once with blood pressure reactivity measured by the manual observers and once by the VitaStat ( n = 79) or Dinamap ( n = 80), with the order determined at random. Ratios (VitaStat/Dinamap) of aggregate within-person variance for baseline and task, systolic and diastolic blood pressures ranged from 1.53 to 4.93 (all P < 0.01), suggesting that the Dinamap has better precision than the VitaStat. For both diastolic and systolic blood pressure reactivity and for both types of automated devices, the mean differences in blood pressure reactivity between manual and automated measurements were small (range, −1.8 to 0.8 mm Hg). However, the VitaStat versus manual scatter plot of diastolic blood pressure reactivity showed greater dispersion (correlation coefficient r = 0.16, P = 0.15) than the Dinamap versus manual scatter plot ( r = 0.36, P = 0.001). For systolic blood pressure reactivity, the VitaStat versus manual and Dinamap versus manual scatter plots were similar. Our data indicate that the Dinamap is superior to the VitaStat in the measurement of blood pressure reactivity. The substantial performance differences between the VitaStat and Dinamap suggest that other automated blood pressure monitors must be evaluated prior to use in cardiovascular reactivity studies." @default.
- W2034865366 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5046705596 @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5047084442 @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5048680434 @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5049535333 @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5060048292 @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5067530047 @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5076838586 @default.
- W2034865366 creator A5089191285 @default.
- W2034865366 date "1990-10-01" @default.
- W2034865366 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2034865366 title "A comparison of two automated monitors in the measurement of blood pressure reactivity" @default.
- W2034865366 cites W1984705598 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W1988044217 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W2019256818 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W2059199453 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W2071074216 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W2102943066 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W2144735333 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W2171100756 @default.
- W2034865366 cites W2215519955 @default.
- W2034865366 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-2797(90)90019-o" @default.
- W2034865366 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1669490" @default.
- W2034865366 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
- W2034865366 type Work @default.
- W2034865366 sameAs 2034865366 @default.
- W2034865366 citedByCount "26" @default.
- W2034865366 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5046705596 @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5047084442 @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5048680434 @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5049535333 @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5060048292 @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5067530047 @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5076838586 @default.
- W2034865366 hasAuthorship W2034865366A5089191285 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C2776910235 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C2910533495 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C57900726 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C126322002 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C142724271 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C164705383 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C204787440 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C2776910235 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C2910533495 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C57900726 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C71924100 @default.
- W2034865366 hasConceptScore W2034865366C84393581 @default.
- W2034865366 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2034865366 hasLocation W20348653661 @default.
- W2034865366 hasLocation W20348653662 @default.
- W2034865366 hasOpenAccess W2034865366 @default.
- W2034865366 hasPrimaryLocation W20348653661 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W1555944403 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W1972605697 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2022652824 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2039871856 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2110813775 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2116954502 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2199827014 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2409073422 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2413577804 @default.
- W2034865366 hasRelatedWork W2428660788 @default.
- W2034865366 hasVolume "1" @default.
- W2034865366 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2034865366 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2034865366 magId "2034865366" @default.
- W2034865366 workType "article" @default.