FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2035038009> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2035038009 endingPage "22" @default.
• W2035038009 startingPage "11" @default.
• W2035038009 abstract "To assess the effectiveness of a new, next-generation antimicrobial dressing (AQUACEL Ag+ dressing) in facilitating healing in a variety of hard-to-heal wounds that may have been compromised by infection and/or biofilm.This was an international, multi-centred, real-life, non-randomised evaluation involving patients with a wide variety of slow-, non-healing or deteriorating chronic and acute wounds. There were no strict inclusion or exclusion criteria and the clinicians were asked to use their discretion in the selection of patients. The clinicians continued to use their standard protocol of care but replaced their existing primary wound-contact dressing with the next-generation antimicrobial dressing (NGAD) for up to 4 weeks. Clinicians could extend the treatment period if this was deemed clinically appropriate. Baseline assessments included wound bed characteristics, exudate level, indicators of wound biofilm, and signs and symptoms of infection. At the final assessment, the investigators reported the wound size, wound bed characteristics, and exudate level.A total of 121 patients were recruited into the original evaluation, of which eight were excluded for incomplete data sets. Most wounds (73; 64%) were either venous leg ulcers (59; 52%) or diabetic foot ulcers (14; 12%). At baseline, the wounds of (26; 23%) patients were slowly improving, 65 were stagnant (58%) and 22 (19%) were deteriorating. Just under three-quarters (74%) of the wounds had suspected biofilm (criteria including failure of a wound to heal, lack of response to topical and systemic antimicrobial agents, or the presence of slimy substances on the wound surface). Following the evaluations, the average wound closure achieved for all wounds was 72.6%, 19 (17%) wounds healed, 47 (42%) achieved at least 90% wound closure, and 71 (63%) achieved at least 75% closure. The average treatment period was 4.1 weeks; 35 wounds were treated with the dressing for more than 4 weeks. Cost analysis indicated that potential antimicrobial dressing cost reductions of approximately 30% were realised using the NGAD.This real-life, non-randomised evaluation provides encouraging evidence that the NGAD may have a role to play in facilitating wound progression towards healing by helping to eliminate the biofilm barrier.M. Walker, D. Metcalf, D. Parsons and P. Bowler are all employees of ConvaTec Ltd. Aysha Mendes da Mata is an independent writer and Annemarie Brown is an independent clinician, both received a fee and support from MA Healthcare to write up the evaluation using data supplied by ConvaTec." @default.
• W2035038009 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2035038009 creator A5001854589 @default.
• W2035038009 creator A5026299811 @default.
• W2035038009 creator A5049862659 @default.
• W2035038009 creator A5059660527 @default.
• W2035038009 date "2015-01-02" @default.
• W2035038009 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2035038009 title "A real-life clinical evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds" @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1673697235 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1749073278 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1880543667 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1948514307 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1983921953 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1986309799 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1989637733 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W1993647980 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2010155159 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2028883571 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2038724178 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2049775044 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2051547677 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2074853205 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2078854277 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2079130094 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2080356492 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2081645146 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2089854781 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2091261521 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2091651320 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2098865966 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2106183421 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2106503480 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2121068067 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2126177656 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2131067445 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2131727615 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2143222764 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2149962435 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2154854413 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2160982143 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2285654014 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2403620471 @default.
• W2035038009 cites W2560021129 @default.
• W2035038009 doi "https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.1.11" @default.
• W2035038009 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25543819" @default.
• W2035038009 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2035038009 type Work @default.
• W2035038009 sameAs 2035038009 @default.
• W2035038009 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092015 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092016 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092017 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092018 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092019 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092020 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092021 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092022 @default.
• W2035038009 countsByYear W20350380092023 @default.
• W2035038009 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2035038009 hasAuthorship W2035038009A5001854589 @default.
• W2035038009 hasAuthorship W2035038009A5026299811 @default.
• W2035038009 hasAuthorship W2035038009A5049862659 @default.
• W2035038009 hasAuthorship W2035038009A5059660527 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C2777858829 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C2778573061 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C2780269544 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C2781051411 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C2993269979 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C2993807428 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C4937899 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C134018914 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C141071460 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C142724271 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C159985019 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C177713679 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C178790620 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C185592680 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C192562407 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C2777858829 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C2778573061 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C2780269544 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C2781051411 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C2993269979 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C2993807428 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C4937899 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C555293320 @default.
• W2035038009 hasConceptScore W2035038009C71924100 @default.

• next