Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2035081519> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2035081519 endingPage "514" @default.
- W2035081519 startingPage "505" @default.
- W2035081519 abstract "Matching of usability problem descriptions consists of determining which problem descriptions are similar and which are not. In most comparisons of evaluation methods matching helps determine the overlap among methods and among evaluators. However, matching has received scant attention in usability research and may be fundamentally unreliable. We compare how 52 novice evaluators match the same set of problem descriptions from three think aloud studies. For matching the problem descriptions the evaluators use either (a) the similarity of solutions to the problems, (b) a prioritization effort for the owner of the application tested, (c) a model proposed by Lavery and colleagues [Lavery, D., Cockton, G., Atkinson, M.P., 1997. Comparison of evaluation methods using structured usability problem reports. Behaviour and Information Technology, 16 (4/5), 246-266], or (d) the User Action Framework [Andre, T.S., Hartson, H.R., Belz, S.M., McCreary, F.A., 2001. The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54 (1), 107-136]. The resulting matches are different, both with respect to the number of problems grouped or identified as unique, and with respect to the content of the problem descriptions that were matched. Evaluators report different concerns and foci of attention when using the techniques. We illustrate how these differences among techniques might adversely influence the reliability of findings in usability research, and discuss some remedies." @default.
- W2035081519 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2035081519 creator A5015615908 @default.
- W2035081519 creator A5042507416 @default.
- W2035081519 date "2008-12-01" @default.
- W2035081519 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2035081519 title "Comparison of techniques for matching of usability problem descriptions" @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2005229107 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2059975159 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2064249452 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2070307271 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2078569098 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2082426156 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2087692971 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2101451656 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2104372013 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2112136322 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2124696116 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W2151854647 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W4229963740 @default.
- W2035081519 cites W4244030505 @default.
- W2035081519 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.08.005" @default.
- W2035081519 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2035081519 type Work @default.
- W2035081519 sameAs 2035081519 @default.
- W2035081519 citedByCount "40" @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192012 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192013 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192014 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192016 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192017 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192018 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192019 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192020 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192021 @default.
- W2035081519 countsByYear W20350815192022 @default.
- W2035081519 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2035081519 hasAuthorship W2035081519A5015615908 @default.
- W2035081519 hasAuthorship W2035081519A5042507416 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConcept C165064840 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConceptScore W2035081519C105795698 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConceptScore W2035081519C107457646 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConceptScore W2035081519C165064840 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConceptScore W2035081519C170130773 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConceptScore W2035081519C23123220 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConceptScore W2035081519C33923547 @default.
- W2035081519 hasConceptScore W2035081519C41008148 @default.
- W2035081519 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2035081519 hasLocation W20350815191 @default.
- W2035081519 hasOpenAccess W2035081519 @default.
- W2035081519 hasPrimaryLocation W20350815191 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W1974725562 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2086064646 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2095257897 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2100369842 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2115485936 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2119135658 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2150075323 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2153015554 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2167040800 @default.
- W2035081519 hasRelatedWork W2357241418 @default.
- W2035081519 hasVolume "20" @default.
- W2035081519 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2035081519 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2035081519 magId "2035081519" @default.
- W2035081519 workType "article" @default.