FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2035733630> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2035733630 endingPage "e12" @default.
• W2035733630 startingPage "e12" @default.
• W2035733630 abstract "The article by Kiecolt-Glaser et al. ( 1 Kiecolt-Glaser J.K. Habash D.L. Fagundes C.P. Andridge R. Peng J. Malarkey W.B. Belury M.A. Daily stressors, past depression, and metabolic responses to high-fat meals: A novel path to obesity. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 77: 653-660 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar ) suggests that a high-fat diet in the setting of depression or recent life stressors leads to weight gain via decreased metabolic rate and increased hormonal influences on fat storage. This study gives insight into an interesting relationship between stress and energy expenditure, but we believe that the label “high-fat” may perpetuate a negative, and not necessarily true, association with this type of diet and weight gain. Carbohydrates are another class of macronutrients that are implicated in slowing metabolism and leading to obesity. A controlled crossover study by Ebbeling et al. ( 2 Ebbeling C.B. Swain J.F. Feldman H.A. Wong W.W. Hachey D.L. Garcia-Lago E. Ludwig D.S. Effects of dietary composition on energy expenditure during weight-loss maintenance. JAMA. 2012; 307: 2627-2634 Crossref PubMed Scopus (272) Google Scholar ) showed that there was a sustained decrease in metabolic rate in patients on a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet compared with a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet. Additionally, a recent randomized trial by Bazzano et al. ( 3 Bazzano L.A. Hu T. Reynolds K. Yao L. Bunol C. Liu Y. et al. Effects of low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161: 309-318 Crossref PubMed Scopus (204) Google Scholar ) comparing calorie-unrestricted versions of these two diets concluded that the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet might provide a better avenue for weight reduction and have certain metabolic risk factor advantages. Stress, Depression, and Metabolism: Replies to Bohan Brown et al. and Barton and YancyBiological PsychiatryVol. 78Issue 4PreviewWe recently reported adverse metabolic alterations related to stress and depression following high-fat meals (1). In their response our article, Bohan Brown et al. (2) raise an interesting question related to our caloric calculations; they suggest that the differences we observed would translate to a gain of 6.4 lb/year compared with the 10.8 lb/year that we had computed based on the 3500 kcal rule. Their argument is based on newer literature that has primarily addressed decreased caloric expenditure as weight loss occurs, but we acknowledge that the state of the field is such that we cannot calculate the total caloric impact over time with certainty. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2035733630 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2035733630 creator A5003533088 @default.
• W2035733630 creator A5061367710 @default.
• W2035733630 date "2015-08-01" @default.
• W2035733630 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2035733630 title "Determining the Culprit: Stress, Fat, or Carbohydrates" @default.
• W2035733630 cites W2078883962 @default.
• W2035733630 cites W2085730892 @default.
• W2035733630 cites W2101149495 @default.
• W2035733630 cites W2102658838 @default.
• W2035733630 cites W2115953294 @default.
• W2035733630 cites W2121537802 @default.
• W2035733630 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.027" @default.
• W2035733630 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4461548" @default.
• W2035733630 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25582267" @default.
• W2035733630 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2035733630 type Work @default.
• W2035733630 sameAs 2035733630 @default.
• W2035733630 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2035733630 countsByYear W20357336302020 @default.
• W2035733630 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2035733630 hasAuthorship W2035733630A5003533088 @default.
• W2035733630 hasAuthorship W2035733630A5061367710 @default.
• W2035733630 hasBestOaLocation W20357336302 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConcept C147583825 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConcept C2780320433 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConcept C544821477 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConceptScore W2035733630C126322002 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConceptScore W2035733630C134018914 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConceptScore W2035733630C147583825 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConceptScore W2035733630C2780320433 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConceptScore W2035733630C511355011 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConceptScore W2035733630C544821477 @default.
• W2035733630 hasConceptScore W2035733630C71924100 @default.
• W2035733630 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2035733630 hasLocation W20357336301 @default.
• W2035733630 hasLocation W20357336302 @default.
• W2035733630 hasLocation W20357336303 @default.
• W2035733630 hasLocation W20357336304 @default.
• W2035733630 hasOpenAccess W2035733630 @default.
• W2035733630 hasPrimaryLocation W20357336301 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W1966504330 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W1979139803 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W2030889776 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W2037631372 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W2040058909 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W2061766728 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W2132898409 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W2989838574 @default.
• W2035733630 hasRelatedWork W4249176446 @default.
• W2035733630 hasVolume "78" @default.
• W2035733630 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2035733630 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2035733630 magId "2035733630" @default.
• W2035733630 workType "article" @default.