Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2036080985> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W2036080985 endingPage "892" @default.
- W2036080985 startingPage "890" @default.
- W2036080985 abstract "Research has been described as “a powerful means of achieving” the objectives of the Department of Health, namely “to improve the health and well-being of the population and to secure high quality care.”1 There is, however, a need to find a balance between facilitating important research and protecting the confidentiality of patients. As the capabilities of information technology grow, legal frameworks and professional guidance need to be created or refined to safeguard the rights of patients.Some areas of the common law duty of confidentiality and the new Data Protection Act 1998 (box, p 891), which constitutes the United Kingdom's implementation of the relevant European Union directive,2 are causing difficulties of interpretation within the NHS. With few exceptions, broad debate about the implications of the new act is lacking, particularly in the context of epidemiological research that uses patients' records.6-8 Questions of consent, anonymisation of data for research, and access to medical notes for research purposes (rather than audit) have been addressed in a range of literature.9-13 Some of these documents are being updated; this may indicate that there are uncertainties about the legal issues involved in implementing the act. Local variations in interpretation may cause particular difficulties for researchers conducting multicentre epidemiological studies, as the case study that will be described in this article shows.In the meantime, those who must make decisions about confidentiality are still confused. This confusion exists for several reasons. Firstly, there is the interpretation of the act (and to an extent the common law duty of confidentiality). The interpretation is subject to debate, and no case law exists which might clarify the interpretation. Secondly, there is a dearth of up to date and clear policy guidance. Thirdly, the new system of “Caldicott guardians” (box) is untried, and guardians as well …" @default.
- W2036080985 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2036080985 creator A5017162019 @default.
- W2036080985 date "2000-10-07" @default.
- W2036080985 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2036080985 title "Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research" @default.
- W2036080985 cites W1819182767 @default.
- W2036080985 cites W1999449406 @default.
- W2036080985 cites W2032445060 @default.
- W2036080985 cites W2141782101 @default.
- W2036080985 cites W4298066304 @default.
- W2036080985 cites W4299937579 @default.
- W2036080985 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7265.890" @default.
- W2036080985 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1118686" @default.
- W2036080985 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11021874" @default.
- W2036080985 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W2036080985 type Work @default.
- W2036080985 sameAs 2036080985 @default.
- W2036080985 citedByCount "89" @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852012 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852013 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852014 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852015 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852016 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852018 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852021 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852022 @default.
- W2036080985 countsByYear W20360809852023 @default.
- W2036080985 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2036080985 hasAuthorship W2036080985A5017162019 @default.
- W2036080985 hasBestOaLocation W20360809852 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C136764020 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C17744445 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C199360897 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C199539241 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C2522767166 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C2777351106 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C41008148 @default.
- W2036080985 hasConceptScore W2036080985C527412718 @default.
- W2036080985 hasIssue "7265" @default.
- W2036080985 hasLocation W20360809851 @default.
- W2036080985 hasLocation W20360809852 @default.
- W2036080985 hasLocation W20360809853 @default.
- W2036080985 hasLocation W20360809854 @default.
- W2036080985 hasLocation W20360809855 @default.
- W2036080985 hasLocation W20360809856 @default.
- W2036080985 hasOpenAccess W2036080985 @default.
- W2036080985 hasPrimaryLocation W20360809851 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W1818517180 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W2088505924 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W2294100823 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W2323581027 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W2375151384 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W2388598795 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W3123827683 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W3151650429 @default.
- W2036080985 hasRelatedWork W4237946303 @default.
- W2036080985 hasVolume "321" @default.
- W2036080985 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2036080985 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2036080985 magId "2036080985" @default.
- W2036080985 workType "article" @default.