FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2036355005> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2036355005 endingPage "111" @default.
• W2036355005 startingPage "110" @default.
• W2036355005 abstract "Reviewed by: Emily Dickinson and Her Contemporaries: Women’s Verse in America 1820–1885 Shira Wolosky (bio) Emily Dickinson and Her Contemporaries: Women’s Verse in America 1820–1885. By Elizabeth A. Petrino, University Press of New England, 1998 240 pp. Elizabeth Petrino’s Emily Dickinson and Her Contemporaries: Women’s Verse in America 1820–1885 carries forward the investigation of women’s verse-writing as context for Dickinson’s own unique achievements. After an overview of feminist discussions of Dickinson, Petrino examines Dickinson’s efforts in a sequence of contexts: publishing practices for women; the child-elegy, a popular genre for nineteenth-century women poets; epitaphs; floral dictionaries and conventions; and questions of female authorship. The women verse-writers most extensively brought for comparison and context are Lydia Sigourney, Frances Sargent Osgood, and Helen Hunt Jackson. The book is most valuable when it reaches past the already established round of references to venture into, for example, children’s portraiture, graveyard inscription, and floral handbooks. Here, new materials are brought forward with very suggestive implications for Dickinson’s handling of some of her characteristic representations: her child’s voice, her voices of death, her flower imagery. Specific texts gain new illumination as references to widespread female discourses are uncovered in poems, including references to particular works that Dickinson knew. Petrino also shows how certain female conventions, such as flower images, offer more complex representation than has been generally acknowledged, both in Dickinson’s writing and beyond it. Petrino’s project of reading Dickinson in terms of her women contemporaries is, of course, no longer new. Rather, she uses a method that has become widely accepted in Dickinson’s studies, in salutary counterweight against the older Dickinson-in-her-room school of criticism. There is certainly much to gain in the recognition that Dickinson wrote in the languages available to her and which she shared with other women contemporary to her. Yet, Petrino’s work also shows some of the weaknesses of this method. The cultural-historical contexts into which Petrino ventures remain rather limited: mainly to literary and almost exclusively to female relationships. This has, first, the problematic result of treating women’s history as though it were some separable, self-bounded set of issues, rather than as part of ongoing historical [End Page 110] events and developments in which women’s history also takes its place. It draws a circle around the lives of women in a way that diminishes a sense of the full impact of women’s lives on general culture. Second, even within the boundaries of women’s history, the book tends to rely on the historical work of other, mainly literary critics and to be descriptive rather than analytical of the hi torical materials it brings. Its presentation of the lives of nineteenth-century is weighted heavily toward the negative, as a story of oppression. Yet the record of achievements by nineteenth-century women in redefining the boundaries and terms of their lives seems to me nothing short of breathtaking. Finally, the balance in this study between social-historical interests and literary analysis remains uneasy. I think it is undeniable that contemporary women’s verse is a useful context for studying, and appreciating, Emily Dickinson. But there is a danger of absorbing Dickinson into a general discourse in ways that obscure her unique achievement. Conversely, I wonder whether Dickinson is the best standard for judging the work of contemporary women’s verse. Against Dickinson’s accomplishment, the stature of other women tends to shrink, and their generic commitments, such as the child-elegy, to flatten. While Petrino’s analysis of Helen Hunt Jackson explores the complexities of her work, Lydia Sigourney risks being reduced to an untalented, predictable writer. She becomes mere foil, instead of courageous innovator writing a poetry of (some) complexity, irony, and self consciousness. I do not think this does her full justice. Petrino’s study joins an important body of work exploring women’s verse, a subject long neglected and even repressed from American literary history. While she does not break new ground, she does cultivate paths worth cultivating, bringing to view a denser network of relationships, a closer scrutiny of..." @default.
• W2036355005 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2036355005 creator A5009329334 @default.
• W2036355005 date "1999-01-01" @default.
• W2036355005 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2036355005 title "Emily Dickinson and Her Contemporaries: Women's Verse in America 1820-1885" @default.
• W2036355005 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/edj.1999.0005" @default.
• W2036355005 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2036355005 type Work @default.
• W2036355005 sameAs 2036355005 @default.
• W2036355005 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2036355005 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2036355005 hasAuthorship W2036355005A5009329334 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C2776359362 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C2781381781 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C124952713 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C138885662 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C142362112 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C151719136 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C164913051 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C166957645 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C17744445 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C199539241 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C2776359362 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C2779343474 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C2781381781 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C41895202 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C554936623 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C94625758 @default.
• W2036355005 hasConceptScore W2036355005C95457728 @default.
• W2036355005 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2036355005 hasLocation W20363550051 @default.
• W2036355005 hasOpenAccess W2036355005 @default.
• W2036355005 hasPrimaryLocation W20363550051 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W1914982563 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W2191595614 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W2231349237 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W2365856794 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W2369864236 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W2373052250 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W2903811053 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W373223454 @default.
• W2036355005 hasRelatedWork W4255992552 @default.
• W2036355005 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2036355005 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2036355005 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2036355005 magId "2036355005" @default.
• W2036355005 workType "article" @default.