FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2036462935> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2036462935 endingPage "19816" @default.
• W2036462935 startingPage "19808" @default.
• W2036462935 abstract "Through the action of its membrane-bound type I receptor, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) elicits a wide range of cellular responses that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apo pto sis. Many of these signaling responses are mediated by Smad proteins. As such, controlling Smad activity is crucial for proper signaling by TGF-β and its related factors. Here, we show that TGF-β induces phos pho ryl a tion at three sites in the Smad3 linker region in addition to the two C-terminal residues, and glycogen synthase kinase 3 is responsible for phos pho ryl a tion at one of these sites, namely Ser-204. Alanine substitution at Ser-204 and/or the neighboring Ser-208, the priming site for glycogen synthase kinase 3 in vivo activity, strengthened the affinity of Smad3 to CREB-binding protein, suggesting that linker phos pho ryl a tion may be part of a negative feedback loop that modulates Smad3 transcriptional activity. Thus, our findings reveal a novel aspect of the Smad3 signaling mechanism that controls the final amplitude of cellular responses to TGF-β. Through the action of its membrane-bound type I receptor, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) elicits a wide range of cellular responses that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apo pto sis. Many of these signaling responses are mediated by Smad proteins. As such, controlling Smad activity is crucial for proper signaling by TGF-β and its related factors. Here, we show that TGF-β induces phos pho ryl a tion at three sites in the Smad3 linker region in addition to the two C-terminal residues, and glycogen synthase kinase 3 is responsible for phos pho ryl a tion at one of these sites, namely Ser-204. Alanine substitution at Ser-204 and/or the neighboring Ser-208, the priming site for glycogen synthase kinase 3 in vivo activity, strengthened the affinity of Smad3 to CREB-binding protein, suggesting that linker phos pho ryl a tion may be part of a negative feedback loop that modulates Smad3 transcriptional activity. Thus, our findings reveal a novel aspect of the Smad3 signaling mechanism that controls the final amplitude of cellular responses to TGF-β. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) 2The abbreviations used are: TGF-βtransforming growth factor-βCREBcAMP-responsive element-binding proteinCBPCREB-binding proteinJNKc-Jun NH2-terminal kinaseERKextracellular signal-regulated kinasepSerphosphoserinepThrphosphothreonineMAPKmitogen-activated protein kinaseCDKcyclin-dependent kinaseGSK3glycogen synthase kinase 3GSTglutathione S-transferaseGFPgreen fluorescent proteinMEFmouse embryonic fibroblastlucluciferaseIPimmunoprecipitationTβRI(TD)constitutively active TβRI. is the prototype of a large family of secreted polypeptide growth factors that regulate a multitude of cellular processes affecting proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (1Massagué J. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998; 67: 753-791Crossref PubMed Scopus (3999) Google Scholar, 2Derynck R. Miyazono K. Derynck R. Miyazono K. The TGF-beta Family. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York2008: 29-43Google Scholar). It is now generally accepted that the plethora of biological activities of TGF-β is initiated by the binding of the ligand to a heteromeric complex of two types of transmembrane receptors: TβRI and TβRII, each equipped with an intrinsic serine/threonine kinase (3Feng X.H. Derynck R. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 659-693Crossref PubMed Scopus (1544) Google Scholar). Ligand occupancy causes an association between TβRII and TβRI, which results in phosphorylation of TβRI by the constitutively active TβRII. The phosphorylated TβRI then triggers activation of Smad2 and/or Smad3 by phosphorylation at the C-terminal serine residues, forcing Smad2 and Smad3 to dissociate from the membrane-bound receptors and form a heteromeric complex with Smad4 (4Wu J.W. Hu M. Chai J. Seoane J. Huse M. Li C. Rigotti D.J. Kyin S. Muir T.W. Fairman R. Massagué J. Shi Y. Mol. Cell. 2001; 8: 1277-1289Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (239) Google Scholar, 5Chacko B.M. Qin B.Y. Tiwari A. Shi G. Lam S. Hayward L.J. De Caestecker M. Lin K. Mol. Cell. 2004; 15: 813-823Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (145) Google Scholar). Phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 also enables them to accumulate in the nucleus (6Schmierer B. Hill C.S. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005; 25: 9845-9858Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar), where Smad3 but not full-length Smad2 directly binds to DNA. However, the affinity of Smad3 to DNA does not support a one-on-one stoichiometry binding model in vivo (7Shi Y. Wang Y.F. Jayaraman L. Yang H. Massagué J. Pavletich N.P. Cell. 1998; 94: 585-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (612) Google Scholar); instead, Smad3 relies on cooperative binding with other transcription factors to elicit respective Smad-mediated transcriptional responses (3Feng X.H. Derynck R. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 659-693Crossref PubMed Scopus (1544) Google Scholar, 8Schmierer B. Hill C.S. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007; 8: 970-982Crossref PubMed Scopus (988) Google Scholar). The Smad transcriptional complexes have the ability to either activate or repress transcription of a selected set of target genes depending on the nature of associated cofactors and the status of local chromatin structure in the context of signal receiving cells. It is now clear that this Smad-mediated signaling pathway is controlled by or functions in conjunction with Smad-independent mechanisms, such as those governed by MAPKs (9Derynck R. Zhang Y.E. Nature. 2003; 425: 577-584Crossref PubMed Scopus (4324) Google Scholar, 10Moustakas A. Heldin C.H. J. Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 3573-3584Crossref PubMed Scopus (911) Google Scholar). These non-Smad signaling conduits can modulate Smad activity to custom fit signaling outputs to a particular need, generating a myriad of cellular responses to TGF-β. transforming growth factor-β cAMP-responsive element-binding protein CREB-binding protein c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphoserine phosphothreonine mitogen-activated protein kinase cyclin-dependent kinase glycogen synthase kinase 3 glutathione S-transferase green fluorescent protein mouse embryonic fibroblast luciferase immunoprecipitation constitutively active TβRI. The Smad proteins consist of an N-terminal (MH1) domain that binds DNA and a C-terminal (MH2) domain that interacts with type I receptors, other Smad proteins, and various transcriptional coactivators/corepressors (11Shi Y. Massagué J. Cell. 2003; 113: 685-700Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4867) Google Scholar). These two highly conserved domains are separated by a less conserved linker region. There are four SP/TP sites for proline-directed kinases in both Smad2 and Smad3 linker regions (12Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Timokhina I. Massagué J. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 804-816Crossref PubMed Scopus (856) Google Scholar). However, except for the first TP site, flanking sequences around the other three SP sites of Smad2 are quite different from those of Smad3, suggesting potentially different modes of regulation between these two proteins. Previously, epidermal growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, the Ras oncogene, and other activators of the MAPK pathway have been shown to induce phosphorylation of Smad2 and/or Smad3 at these linker sites (12Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Timokhina I. Massagué J. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 804-816Crossref PubMed Scopus (856) Google Scholar, 13Mori S. Matsuzaki K. Yoshida K. Furukawa F. Tahashi Y. Yamagata H. Sekimoto G. Seki T. Matsui H. Nishizawa M. Fujisawa J. Okazaki K. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 7416-7429Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar, 14Matsuura I. Wang G. He D. Liu F. Biochemistry. 2005; 44: 12546-12553Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar). In addition, during cell cycle progression, the Smad3 linker can also be phosphorylated by activated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) during the G1/S phase (15Matsuura I. Denissova N.G. Wang G. He D. Long J. Liu F. Nature. 2004; 430: 226-231Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar). Many of these phosphorylation events have been reported to have an antagonistic role on Smad3 activity (12Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Timokhina I. Massagué J. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 804-816Crossref PubMed Scopus (856) Google Scholar, 14Matsuura I. Wang G. He D. Liu F. Biochemistry. 2005; 44: 12546-12553Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar, 15Matsuura I. Denissova N.G. Wang G. He D. Long J. Liu F. Nature. 2004; 430: 226-231Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar), which may be a mechanism for overriding TGF-β-induced growth arrest by cancer cells expressing high levels of CDKs or oncogenic Ras. Conversely, a synergistic activation effect by linker phosphorylation on Smad3 activity has also been reported (13Mori S. Matsuzaki K. Yoshida K. Furukawa F. Tahashi Y. Yamagata H. Sekimoto G. Seki T. Matsui H. Nishizawa M. Fujisawa J. Okazaki K. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 7416-7429Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar). It is possible that each phosphorylation event produces a different impact on Smad3 activity through a different underlying molecular mechanism. Further detailed studies of individual phosphorylation sites are needed to clarify the contribution of these linker phosphorylation events to Smad3 function. Here, we report that TGF-β can induce phosphorylation of Smad3 at Thr-179, Ser-204, and Ser-208. We show that glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) directly phosphorylates Smad3 at Ser-204, whereas a different kinase may be responsible for phosphorylation of Ser-208, which is a prerequisite priming site for GSK3 activity in vivo. We further demonstrate that mutations at Ser-204 and Ser-208 strengthened the transcriptional activity of Smad3 by enhancing its affinity to CBP. Thus, our findings reveal a novel aspect of the Smad3 signaling mechanism, entailing a negative feedback control by phosphorylation of the Smad3 linker region. Full-length Smad3 cDNA (16Zhang Y. Feng X. We R. Derynck R. Nature. 1996; 383: 168-172Crossref PubMed Scopus (759) Google Scholar) without the start codon was subcloned into pCMV5-FLAG (17Hoodless P.A. Haerry T. Abdollah S. Stapleton M. O'Connor M.B. Attisano L. Wrana J.L. Cell. 1996; 85: 489-500Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (626) Google Scholar) to generate N-terminal FLAG-tagged Smad3. Smad3 mutations were generated using a PCR-based strategy and subcloned into pCMV5-FLAG. All PCR-amplified regions were verified by sequencing. Plasmids for GST-Smad3 (16Zhang Y. Feng X. We R. Derynck R. Nature. 1996; 383: 168-172Crossref PubMed Scopus (759) Google Scholar), GST-Smad3NL, GST-Smad3C (18Zhang Y. Feng X.H. Derynck R. Nature. 1998; 394: 909-913Crossref PubMed Scopus (688) Google Scholar), and Myc-Smurf2 (19Zhang Y. Chang C. Gehling D.J. Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Derynck R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001; 98: 974-979Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar) have been described previously. GST-Smad3L was constructed by inserting the Pro-147–Gln-222 fragment of Smad3 into the BamHI/XhoI sites of pGEX-4T-2 (Amersham Biosciences). An expression plasmid for Myc-tagged CBP was a gift from Dr. S. H. Snyder's lab. The rabbit polyclonal antibody against pSer-423/pSer-425 of Smad3 was generated using a synthetic peptide PSIRCS(pS)V(pS) in collaboration with Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc. (Gilbertsville, PA). Rabbit antiserums against Smad3 pThr-179, pSer-204, or pSer-208 were gifts from Dr. F. Liu (15Matsuura I. Denissova N.G. Wang G. He D. Long J. Liu F. Nature. 2004; 430: 226-231Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar). The monoclonal antibody to GSK3 was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). GSK3 inhibitor SB216763 and ALK5 inhibitor SB431542 were obtained from Tocris Bioscience (Ellisville, MO), whereas MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126, p38 inhibitor SB203580, and JNK inhibitor SP600125 were purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). All other antibodies and reagents used in this study have been described previously (20Yamashita M. Fatyol K. Jin C. Wang X. Liu Z. Zhang Y.E. Mol. Cell. 2008; 31: 918-924Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (443) Google Scholar, 21Yamashita M. Ying S.X. Zhang G.M. Li C. Cheng S.Y. Deng C.X. Zhang Y.E. Cell. 2005; 121: 101-113Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (291) Google Scholar, 22Yu L. Hébert M.C. Zhang Y.E. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 3749-3759Crossref PubMed Scopus (589) Google Scholar). Cultural conditions for C2C12 cells have been described previously (23Ying S.X. Hussain Z.J. Zhang Y.E. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 39029-39036Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). HEK293 (CRL-1573, ATCC), wild type, and Smad3−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (24Yang X. Letterio J.J. Lechleider R.J. Chen L. Hayman R. Gu H. Roberts A.B. Deng C. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 1280-1291Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Hep3B (HB8064, ATCC), mink lung epithelial cells including wild type (Mv1Lu) (CCL64, ATCC), TβRI-defective RIBL17 (25Cárcamo J. Weis F.M. Ventura F. Wieser R. Wrana J.L. Attisano L. Massagué J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3810-3821Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), and RIBL17 cells that stably express TβRI (26Feng X.H. Zhang Y. Wu R.Y. Derynck R. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 2153-2163Crossref PubMed Scopus (451) Google Scholar) were maintained in minimal essential Eagle's medium with Earle's balanced salt solution supplemented with nonessential amino acids and 10% FBS. AML12 cells (CRL2254, ATCC) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 medium containing 10% FBS, 40 ng/ml dexamethasone and ITS+ premix (VWR Scientific). Transfections of Hep3B and HEK293 cells were done using FuGENE 6 (Roche Applied Science), while transfection of MEFs was carried out with Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) was used for small interfering RNA transfection. The methods for Western blotting and immunoprecipitation have been described previously (19Zhang Y. Chang C. Gehling D.J. Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Derynck R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001; 98: 974-979Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar). Separation of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were performed by harvesting cells in buffer A containing 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mm NaCl, 2 mm MgCl2, and 5 mm dithiothreitol with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Nonidet P-40 was added at a final concentration of 0.5%. After an incubation of 10–15 min on ice, the cytoplasmic fraction (supernatant) was isolated by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 5 min. The pellets were washed twice with buffer A and incubated with buffer B containing 20 mm Hepes, pH 7.9, 420 mm NaCl, 1.5 mm MgCl2, 5 mm dithiothreitol, and 10% glycerol with protease and phosphatase inhibitors for 30 min on ice. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was collected as nuclear fraction. Recombinant GST or GST-Smad3 fusion proteins (1 μg) purified from bacteria were incubated with a Myc-tagged TβRI cytoplasmic domain immunoprecipitated from transfected HEK293 cells or commercially available activated recombinant JNK2, p38α, Erk2, and GSK3β (Calbiochem) in 1× kinase buffer (10 mm Hepes-KOH, pH 7.5, 5 mm MgCl2, 5 mm MnCl2, and 5 mm CaCl2) at 30 °C. Either 5 μCi of [γ-32P]ATP (5,000 μCi/mmol) or 1 mm ATP was included in the reaction. After a 30-min incubation, the reaction was stopped by adding an equal volume of 2× SDS sample buffer and subjected to autoradiography or anti-phospho-Smad3 blotting after electrophoresis using 10% SDS-PAGE. MEFs seeded into 12-well plates were transfected with (CAGA)12-Luc (27Dennler S. Itoh S. Vivien D. ten Dijke P. Huet S. Gauthier J.M. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 3091-3100Crossref PubMed Scopus (1588) Google Scholar) (0.25 μg), pRK-βgal (28Feng X.H. Filvaroff E.H. Derynck R. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 24237-24245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar) (0.05 μg), vector control, or Smad3 plasmid (0.01 μg). Twenty-four h after transfection, cells were treated with 4 ng/ml TGF-β in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 0.2% FBS for overnight. Cells were then harvested to measure luciferase and β-galactosidase activities. All assays were performed in duplicate and repeated more than three times, and all values were normalized for transfection efficiency against β-galactosidase activity. To map the GSK3-dependent phosphorylation site within the Smad3 linker, GST-Smad3L phosphorylated by GSK3β in vitro was excised from SDS-PAGE after Coomassie Blue staining. The gel slice was subjected to digestion with trypsin and/or Glu-C. The peptides were extracted and analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled directly on-line with a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) as described previously (29Yu L.R. Conrads T.P. Uo T. Kinoshita Y. Morrison R.S. Lucas D.A. Chan K.C. Blonder J. Issaq H.J. Veenstra T.D. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2004; 3: 896-907Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar). The raw tandem mass spectrometry data were searched using SEQUEST (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA) against a data base consisting of the human Smad3 protein sequence. The identified phosphopeptides were further examined by manual inspection of the tandem mass spectrometry spectra to confirm identification of the correct peptide sequence and sites of phosphorylation. Smad3 and Smad3 S204A/S208A double mutant (2SPAP) cDNA were subcloned into a pDUALCCM-CMVEGFP shuttle vector (Vector Biolabs, Philadelphia, PA) and transferred into an adenovirus genome and produced adenovirus constitutively expressing Smad3 and Smad3 (2SPAP). GFP control adenovirus was also obtained from Vector Biolabs. Infection of AML12 cells was performed in a 60-mm plate at a multiplicity of infection of 100 with a single virus for 2 h in plain Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 medium. Infected cells were recovered in regular medium for 24 h and split into 24-well plates. For proliferation assay, cells were incubated with TGF-β (4 ng/ml) for 40 h, and 3H-thymidine was added at the last 4 h. A major event leading to Smad3 activation is the TGF-β-induced, TβRI-mediated phosphorylation at two C-terminal serine residues, Ser-423 and Ser-425, which triggers dissociation of Smad3 from its receptors to form a complex with Smad4 and accumulate in the nucleus (3Feng X.H. Derynck R. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 21: 659-693Crossref PubMed Scopus (1544) Google Scholar, 8Schmierer B. Hill C.S. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007; 8: 970-982Crossref PubMed Scopus (988) Google Scholar). Phosphorylation in the Smad3 linker region connecting two conserved MH1 and MH2 domains has been considered as part of the mechanisms responsible for cross-talks between TGF-β and other kinase pathways such as ERK, JNK, and p38, as well as cyclin-dependent kinase CDK2/4 (12Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Timokhina I. Massagué J. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 804-816Crossref PubMed Scopus (856) Google Scholar, 13Mori S. Matsuzaki K. Yoshida K. Furukawa F. Tahashi Y. Yamagata H. Sekimoto G. Seki T. Matsui H. Nishizawa M. Fujisawa J. Okazaki K. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 7416-7429Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar, 14Matsuura I. Wang G. He D. Liu F. Biochemistry. 2005; 44: 12546-12553Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar, 15Matsuura I. Denissova N.G. Wang G. He D. Long J. Liu F. Nature. 2004; 430: 226-231Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar). When tested initially in mouse C2C12 myoblasts, however, we were surprised to find that TGF-β not only induced C-terminal phosphorylation but also phosphorylation of Thr-179, Ser-204, and Ser-208 in the linker region (Fig. 1A), as evident by Western blot analysis using phospho-specific antibodies (15Matsuura I. Denissova N.G. Wang G. He D. Long J. Liu F. Nature. 2004; 430: 226-231Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar). The onset of these phosphorylation events had similar kinetics as the C-terminal phosphorylation (Fig. 1A). The specificity of the phospho-antibodies was confirmed in Smad3-deficient MEFs (Fig. 1B). To determine whether the TGF-β-induced linker phosphorylation on Smad3 requires the TβRI, we examined the phosphorylation status of Smad3 in RIBL17 cells, a line of the TβRI-defective mink lung epithelial cells (25Cárcamo J. Weis F.M. Ventura F. Wieser R. Wrana J.L. Attisano L. Massagué J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3810-3821Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Whereas in wild type mink lung cells (Mv1Lu) TGF-β was able to induce phosphorylation at Thr-179, Ser-204, and Ser-208 residues, it failed to do so in the RIBL17 cells (Fig. 1C). Stable expression of TβRI restored TGF-β-induced linker phosphorylation in RIBL17 cells (Fig. 1C), indicating that the type I receptor is essential. However, it appeared that TβRI is not the kinase that directly phosphorylates Smad3 at these linker sites because purified cytoplasmic domain of TβRI with an intact kinase domain failed to phosphorylate the Smad3 linker sites in vitro, albeit it was capable to phosphorylate the Ser-423 and Ser-425 at the C terminus (Fig. 1D). Thr-179, Ser-204, and Ser-208 of Smad3 are situated immediately N-terminal to a proline residue in the linker region, making them plausible sites for phosphorylation by proline-directed protein kinases. Previously, Thr-179 was shown as a phosphorylation site for CDKs, whereas all three residues were shown as sites for ERK induced by epidermal growth factor (14Matsuura I. Wang G. He D. Liu F. Biochemistry. 2005; 44: 12546-12553Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar, 15Matsuura I. Denissova N.G. Wang G. He D. Long J. Liu F. Nature. 2004; 430: 226-231Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar). A separate study also reported that Ser-208 could be phosphorylated by JNK in response to hepatocyte growth factor stimulation (13Mori S. Matsuzaki K. Yoshida K. Furukawa F. Tahashi Y. Yamagata H. Sekimoto G. Seki T. Matsui H. Nishizawa M. Fujisawa J. Okazaki K. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 7416-7429Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar). Because these MAP kinases can be activated by TGF-β as the consequence of non-Smad signaling, we examined whether they had a role in the TGF-β-induced linker phosphorylation of Smad3 in AML12 cells. By treating the cells in the presence of specific kinase inhibitors, we found that neither ERK, p38, nor JNK kinases had any effect on the status of TGF-β-induced linker phosphorylation (Fig. 2A). Similar results were obtained in C2C12 cells (data not shown). These results suggest that one or several different kinases are likely responsible for phosphorylation at the above three sites. Indeed, we found that phosphorylation of Ser-204 was significantly inhibited by a selective GSK3 inhibitor, SB216763 (Fig. 2A). Treating C2C12 cells with LiCl, a potent GSK3 inhibitor, also diminished TGF-β-induced Ser-204 phosphorylation (Fig. 2B), whereas phosphorylation at all three sites was blocked by SB431542, a TβRI kinase-specific inhibitor (Fig. 2A). These data reiterated the requirement of TβRI in linker phosphorylation and suggest that GSK3 can phosphorylate Smad3 at least at one site within the linker region. To corroborate the above findings, we probed the role of GSK3 in Ser-204 phosphorylation with two previously verified human GSK3 small interfering RNAs (30Aza-Blanc P. Cooper C.L. Wagner K. Batalov S. Deveraux Q.L. Cooke M.P. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 627-637Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (309) Google Scholar) in Hep3B cells. The separate knocking down of either GSK3α or GSK3β had little effect on Ser-204 phosphorylation, whereas knockdown of both GSK3 genes simultaneously diminished the phosphorylation at this site (Fig. 2C). As expected, phosphorylation of Ser-208 or the two C-terminal residues Ser-423/Ser-425 was not affected by GSK3-specific small interfering RNA (Fig. 2C). These results confirmed that GSK3 activity is required for TGF-β-induced Ser-204 phosphorylation. GSK3 recognizes a (S/T)XXX(S/T) consensus motif on its substrates, in which the first serine or threonine residue of this motif is the actual GSK3 phosphorylation site. Phosphorylation by GSK3 in vivo requires a priming event at the second serine or threonine residue, usually catalyzed by a different kinase (31Cohen P. Frame S. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001; 2: 769-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (1304) Google Scholar). Ser-204 is the only potential GSK3 site in the entire linker region of Smad3. Because phosphorylation of Ser-208 slightly precedes that of Ser-204 (Fig. 1A), this phosphorylation could potentially be the priming event for the GSK3 action at Ser-204. To test this hypothesis, we created point mutations at Thr-179, Ser-204, and Ser-208, respectively, and introduced these Smad3 mutants into the Smad3-deficient cells. Our results showed that alanine substitution at Ser-208 but not Thr-179 abolished phosphorylation at Ser-204, whereas phosphorylation at Ser-208 or Thr-179 was not affected by the mutation of other residues (Fig. 3). These results suggest that prior phosphorylation at Ser-208 is likely required for the subsequent phosphorylation at Ser-204 in vivo. A recent study identified Smad3 in a complex with GSK3 (32Guo X. Ramirez A. Waddell D.S. Li Z. Liu X. Wang X.F. Genes Dev. 2008; 22: 106-120Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar), and we also observed the physical interaction between endogenous GSK3 and Smad3 in C2C12 cells (Fig. 4A) or between the transfected HA-GSK3β and FLAG-Smad3 in Hep3B cells (Fig. 4B) as shown by co-immunoprecipitation assays. The affinity of Smad3 to GSK3 was decreased after TGF-β stimulation, possibly due to a rapid dissociation after phosphorylation. This argues that Ser-204 may be phosphorylated directly by GSK3. To investigate this possibility, we performed in vitro kinase assays on various full-length or truncated Smad3 fragments using purified recombinant GSK3β and found that full-length Smad3, the N-terminal domain plus the linker region (Smad3NL), and the linker fragment (Smad3L) can be phosphorylated by GSK3β (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the C-terminal domain alone (Smad3C) or the GST control was not phosphorylated (Fig. 5A). Analysis of the phosphorylated GST-Smad3L fusion proteins by tandem mass spectrometry identified a phospho-peptide generated by Glu-C digestion corresponding to residues from 194 to 222 of Smad3 (Fig. 5B). A phosphoserine residue, Ser-204, is present in this peptide, but surprisingly, Ser-208 was also found to be phosphorylated (Fig. 5B). This result was likely caused by the diminished requirement of priming phosphorylation by GSK3 in vitro. To further confirm the direct phosphorylation by GSK3 in the linker region, the in vitro kinase assays were repeated on GST-Smad3 fusion protein, and Western blot analysis was conducted using Ser-204 and Ser-208 phospho-specific antibodies. As shown in Fig. 5C, Ser-204 was phosphorylated by GSK3β, ERK, JNK, and p38 in vitro, as was Ser-208, but the efficiency of GSK3β toward Ser-208 was lower in comparison with other kinases. Taken together, the above results demonstrated that Smad3 could be directly phosphorylated by GSK3 at Ser-204.FIGURE 5GSK3 directly phosphorylates Smad3 at Ser-204. A, autoradiography of various GST-Smad3 fusion proteins phosphorylated in vitro for 30 min by recombinant GSK3 in the presence of 32P-labeled ATP. Total inputs of purified GST, GST-Smad3, Smad3NL, Smad3L, and Smad3C fusion proteins were shown by Coomassie staining in the right panel. B, mass spectrum detection of a phosphopeptide corresponding to residues His-194 to Gln-222 of Smad3. Phosphorylated Ser-204 and Ser-208 were denoted with an asterisk. C, in vitro kinase assay of purified GST-Smad3 by recombinant GSK3β, JNK, p38, or ERK. Phosphorylation of Ser-204 or Ser-208 was detected by phospho-specific antibodies in Western analysis. Equal loading of substrates was confirmed by anti-Smad3 blot.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) To determine the role of GSK3-induced phosphorylation of Ser-204, we first measured the effect of the GSK3 inhibitor, LiCl, on the transcriptional activity of Smad3. GSK3 was recently shown to phosphorylate Smad3 at Thr-66 in the N terminus, thereby causing Smad3 to be unstable (32Guo X. Ramirez A. Waddell D.S. Li Z. Liu X. Wang X.F. Genes Dev. 2008; 22: 106-120Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar). To exclude the effect of Thr-66 phosphorylation, we performed this experiment with a T66V mutant Smad3 in MEFs isolated from Smad3-deficient embryos. In the absence of Smad3, TGF-β cannot activate transcription from the (CAGA)12-Luc reporter (27Dennler S. Itoh S. Vivien D. ten Dijke P. Huet S. Gauthier J.M. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 3091-3100Crossref PubMed Scopus (1588) Google Scholar), but this activity can be restored upon transfection of Smad3 T66V, and suppressing GSK3 activity with LiCl treatment further augmented this activity (Fig. 6A). To specifically assess the effect of Ser-204 and Ser-208 phosphorylation on Smad3, we measured the transcriptional activity of Smad3 S204A and S208A mutants and found that these mutants were more potent in restoring TGF-β activation of the (CAGA)12-Luc reporter than their wild type counterparts (Fig. 6B). The S204A/S208A double mutant (2SPAP) exhibited even higher activity in this rescuing experiment (Fig. 6B). Because the expression levels of these mutants were comparable with that of the wild type Smad3, their elevated transcriptional activity was likely due to changes in the phosphorylation status. Next, we examined the effects of S204A and S208A mutants on the growth inhibitory response of TGF-β by measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation in AML12 cells that were infected with adenoviruses expressing wild type Smad3 or the S204A/S208A double mutant, 2SPAP. Control GFP adenovirus-infected cells exhibited a normal TGF-β-induced inhibitory response on DNA synthesis in the presence of 10% FBS, as their proliferation was reduced to 44% in the presence of TGF-β (Fig. 6C). Overexpression of wild type Smad3 further reduced the proliferation in the presence of TGF-β to 37% as expected. Expression of the Smad3 2SPAP mutant rendered cells even more sensitive to TGF-β-induced growth inhibition, as proliferation was reduced to 21% in comparison with that of untreated cells (Fig. 6C). Taken together, these results indicate that phosphorylation of Smad3 at the linker region by GSK3 inhibits Smad3 activity. A recent report showed that phosphorylation of Smad1 linker by ERK and GSK3 enhances interaction between Smad1 and Smurf1, thereby promoting Smad1 degradation (33Sapkota G. Alarcón C. Spagnoli F.M. Brivanlou A.H. Massagué J. Mol. Cell. 2007; 25: 441-454Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (321) Google Scholar). Because Smad3 binds to the ubiquitin ligase Smurf2 through a PY motif, upstream of Ser-204/Ser-208 in the linker region (19Zhang Y. Chang C. Gehling D.J. Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Derynck R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001; 98: 974-979Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar), it is possible that phosphorylation of Ser-204 affects Smad3 stability by strengthening the interaction between Smad3 and Smurf2. However, this result was not observed in our experiments as the Ser-204 and/or Ser-208 mutants bound Smurf2 with the same affinity as wild type Smad3 (Fig. 7A), and no change in stability of these mutants was detected compared with wild type Smad3 (data not shown), which was consistent with reports by other laboratories (32Guo X. Ramirez A. Waddell D.S. Li Z. Liu X. Wang X.F. Genes Dev. 2008; 22: 106-120Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar, 33Sapkota G. Alarcón C. Spagnoli F.M. Brivanlou A.H. Massagué J. Mol. Cell. 2007; 25: 441-454Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (321) Google Scholar). Phosphorylation within Smad3 linker regions has been shown to prevent nuclear accumulation (12Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Timokhina I. Massagué J. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 804-816Crossref PubMed Scopus (856) Google Scholar). To elucidate whether phosphorylation of Ser-204 has this effect, we examined the intracellular distribution of Smad3 in AML12 cells that had been deprived of serum for overnight and then treated with TGF-β for 1 h. After subfractionating cells into cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, we analyzed the content of various forms of Smad3 in these two fractions by Western blotting. As expected, TGF-β treatment increased nuclear but decreased cytoplasmic content of total Smad3 (Fig. 6B). Under this condition, the C-terminally phosphorylated form of Smad3 (pSer-423/pSer-425) was detected exclusively in the nucleus, whereas the majority of Ser-204 phosphorylated form of Smad3 was also found in the nuclear fractions (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that phosphorylation of Ser-204 does not prevent nuclear accumulation of Smad3. In light of the increased transcriptional activity of the S204A and 2SPAP mutants (Fig. 7B) and a previous report showing that the linker region of Smad3 can interact physically with transcription coactivator p300/CBP (34Wang G. Long J. Matsuura I. He D. Liu F. Biochem. J. 2005; 386: 29-34Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar, 35Prokova V. Mavridou S. Papakosta P. Kardassis D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33: 3708-3721Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar), we tested whether phosphorylation of Ser-204 affects the binding between Smad3 and CBP. We cotransfected HEK293 cells with Myc-tagged CBP and FLAG-tagged Smad3 along with the constitutively active TβRI(TD) and then determined binding affinity using immunoprecipitation assays. As shown in Fig. 8A, activation of the TGF-β pathway by TβRI(TD) induced the interaction between Smad3 and CBP, but the S204A and 2SPAP mutants exhibited even stronger affinity toward CBP after TβRI activation. We also examined the effect of endogenous GSK3 on the interaction between Smad3 and CBP using Smad3-T66V in the absence or presence of LiCl. As shown in Fig. 8B, suppressing GSK3 activity with LiCl greatly enhanced the physical interaction between Smad3 and CBP, suggesting that phosphorylation of Ser-204 by GSK3 likely inhibits the Smad3 transcriptional activity by reducing its interaction with CBP. In this report, we showed that upon TGF-β stimulation, Smad3 undergoes a relatively rapid phosphorylation at three residues in the linker region in addition to C-terminal phosphorylation and identified GSK3 as the kinase responsible for one of the sites, Ser-204. We further showed that an alanine substitution at Ser-204 strengthened the ability of Smad3 to bind CBP, implying that phosphorylation at this site may decrease the transcriptional activity of Smad3. Thus, our findings suggest that by eliciting these two phosphorylation events simultaneously, TGF-β likely calls on a negative feedback loop to modulate the amplitude of final signaling output. The structurally diverse linker region of Smad proteins harbors a number of kinase recognition motifs and a Smurf binding site. Numerous studies have shown that this region is the convergence point by multiple signaling pathways to attenuate or otherwise modulate downstream cellular responses to the TGF-β family of ligands. For instance, there are four ERK consensus sites present in Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 of the bone morphogenetic protein pathway; phosphorylation at these sites in response to fibroblast growth factors is associated with Smurf1 binding and cytoplasmic retention (33Sapkota G. Alarcón C. Spagnoli F.M. Brivanlou A.H. Massagué J. Mol. Cell. 2007; 25: 441-454Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (321) Google Scholar, 36Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Massagué J. Nature. 1997; 389: 618-622Crossref PubMed Scopus (775) Google Scholar). Balancing bone morphogenetic protein signaling through integrating fibroblast growth factor input at the Smad1 linker region is important for maintaining tissue homeostasis during development (37Pera E.M. Ikeda A. Eivers E. De Robertis E.M. Genes Dev. 2003; 17: 3023-3028Crossref PubMed Scopus (343) Google Scholar, 38Aubin J. Davy A. Soriano P. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 1482-1494Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). There are also four MAPK sites in Smad2 and Smad3 linkers; phosphorylation at these sites was attributed as one of the mechanisms that the Ras oncogene uses to counteract the tumor suppressive function of TGF-β (12Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Timokhina I. Massagué J. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 804-816Crossref PubMed Scopus (856) Google Scholar). Phosphorylation within the Smad3 linker was also shown to be catalyzed by CDK2 and CDK4 during the entry into mitosis, leading to decreased expression of CDK inhibitor p15 and thus a subdued TGF-β-mediated growth inhibition (15Matsuura I. Denissova N.G. Wang G. He D. Long J. Liu F. Nature. 2004; 430: 226-231Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar). The PY motif in the linker region recognized by the HECT domain E3 ligase Smurf is critical in curtailing Smad functions by allowing Smurf-mediated ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (19Zhang Y. Chang C. Gehling D.J. Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Derynck R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001; 98: 974-979Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar, 39Zhu H. Kavsak P. Abdollah S. Wrana J.L. Thomsen G.H. Nature. 1999; 400: 687-693Crossref PubMed Scopus (693) Google Scholar, 40Lin X. Liang M. Feng X.H. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 36818-36822Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (408) Google Scholar). Thus, the notion that TGF-β also taps into the linker region to moderate Smad3 transcriptional activity is consistent with the regulatory function of this domain. Together with a previous study of Smad1, the current finding on Smad3 linker phosphorylation revealed a general aspect of Smad signaling mechanism. However, not all kinases or the consequential effects of the linker phosphorylation are known. Although ample experimental data have implicated activation of MAPK pathways as part of the non-Smad TGF-β signaling mechanism, our results nevertheless pointed to GSK3, not any MAPK, as the kinase that directly phosphorylates Ser-204 upon TGF-β stimulation. This is reminiscent of the BMP-induced Smad1 linker phosphorylation, which is also independent of MAPK (33Sapkota G. Alarcón C. Spagnoli F.M. Brivanlou A.H. Massagué J. Mol. Cell. 2007; 25: 441-454Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (321) Google Scholar). Recently, GSK3 was shown to phosphorylate Thr-66 outside the linker region, which has a role in controlling the basal level of Smad3 through degradation (32Guo X. Ramirez A. Waddell D.S. Li Z. Liu X. Wang X.F. Genes Dev. 2008; 22: 106-120Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar). In our experiments, alanine substitution of Ser-204 not only had no effect on Smad3 stability, but it also failed to influence Smurf2 binding, suggesting that the negative feedback control exerted by GSK3 over Smad3 differs from its activity at Thr-66 in both location and effect. However, because in most experiments TGF-β treatment was carried out in serum-starved cells, a condition in which GSK3 is constitutively active, phosphorylation of Ser-204 by GSK3 might require input from an unknown priming kinase induced by TGF-β that phosphorylates Ser-208. The different priming kinase activities likely represent two faces of the same GSK3 function as a repressive kinase of TGF-β signaling. Earlier studies also showed cytoplasmic retention of Smad3 phosphorylated by MAPK/Ras and mutated Smad3 lacking all linker phosphorylation sites, suggesting linker phosphorylation could lead to nuclear exclusion of Smad3 precluding it from participating in target gene transcription (12Kretzschmar M. Doody J. Timokhina I. Massagué J. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 804-816Crossref PubMed Scopus (856) Google Scholar). A recent report showed that phosphorylation of the Smad1 linker by ERK and GSK3 enables Smad1 to be recognized by Smurf1, which in addition to inducing ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of Smad1, can dislodge Smad1 binding to nuclear translocation factor Nup214 due to steric hindrance, thus leading to cytoplasmic retention of Smad1 (33Sapkota G. Alarcón C. Spagnoli F.M. Brivanlou A.H. Massagué J. Mol. Cell. 2007; 25: 441-454Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (321) Google Scholar). However, we found a majority of the Ser-204 phosphorylated form of Smad3 in the nucleus upon TGF-β stimulation, and alanine substitution at either Ser-204 or Ser-208 did not alter the physical interaction between Smurf2 and Smad3. Instead, the S204A and S208A mutant of Smad3 exhibited heightened affinity toward CBP, suggesting that phosphorylation at these two sites may have direct impact on Smad3 transcriptional activity. The discrepancy between these observations is likely a reflection of the nature of linker mutations used in different experiments and awaits further resolution by more detailed studies. We thank Drs. F. Liu for Smad3 linker phospho-specific antibodies, J. Massagué for RIBL17 cells, X. H. Feng and R. Derynck for RI14 cells, C. X. Deng for Smad3 knockout mice, X. He for HA-GSK3β plasmid, S. H. Snyder for Myc-CBP plasmid, P. ten Dijke for (CAGA)12-Luc reporter construct, and L. Y. Tang and K. Sixt for assistance." @default.
• W2036462935 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2036462935 creator A5014120233 @default.
• W2036462935 creator A5019010663 @default.
• W2036462935 creator A5036125160 @default.
• W2036462935 creator A5042411408 @default.
• W2036462935 creator A5046525796 @default.
• W2036462935 creator A5088688923 @default.
• W2036462935 date "2009-07-01" @default.
• W2036462935 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2036462935 title "A Negative Feedback Control of Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3-mediated Smad3 Linker Phosphorylation at Ser-204" @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1519258930 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1528120845 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1533133582 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1609684706 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1971157583 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1988810849 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1992468405 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W1999506807 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2007044718 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2021484300 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2026428548 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2035653659 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2037483846 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2051310004 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2062934426 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2066612343 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2068207017 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2071035473 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2086692663 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2092828528 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2093417867 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2102868284 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2103031848 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2104406613 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2104570676 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2106472833 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2113989947 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2117200840 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2119727612 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2121246711 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2128239138 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2131464048 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2139540060 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2143714027 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2148392040 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2154568166 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W2164615751 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W3141873631 @default.
• W2036462935 cites W4367011167 @default.
• W2036462935 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m109.016667" @default.
• W2036462935 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2740406" @default.
• W2036462935 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19458083" @default.
• W2036462935 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2036462935 type Work @default.
• W2036462935 sameAs 2036462935 @default.
• W2036462935 citedByCount "67" @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352012 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352013 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352014 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352015 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352016 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352017 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352018 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352019 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352020 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352021 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352022 @default.
• W2036462935 countsByYear W20364629352023 @default.
• W2036462935 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2036462935 hasAuthorship W2036462935A5014120233 @default.
• W2036462935 hasAuthorship W2036462935A5019010663 @default.
• W2036462935 hasAuthorship W2036462935A5036125160 @default.
• W2036462935 hasAuthorship W2036462935A5042411408 @default.
• W2036462935 hasAuthorship W2036462935A5046525796 @default.
• W2036462935 hasAuthorship W2036462935A5088688923 @default.
• W2036462935 hasBestOaLocation W20364629351 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C112243037 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C118131993 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C11960822 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C165801399 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C181199279 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C182996813 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C184235292 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C192118531 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C2780557392 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C62478195 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C93586867 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConceptScore W2036462935C111919701 @default.
• W2036462935 hasConceptScore W2036462935C112243037 @default.

• next