FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2036724995> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2036724995 endingPage "61" @default.
• W2036724995 startingPage "61" @default.
• W2036724995 abstract "Influence of microkeratome parameters on the stromal bed and flap edge quality in laser in situ keratomileusis Jens Heichel,1 Frank Wilhelm,2 Kathleen S Kunert,3 Rabea Schlueter,4 Ute Stuhltraeger,1 Thomas Hammer5 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Martin Luther University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany; 2Augen im Zentrum, Greifswald, Germany; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany; 4Institute of Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany; 5Augenzentrum Frohe Zukunft, Halle (Saale), Germany Purpose: Femtosecond lasers have become the standard for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap creation, but advanced mechanical microkeratomes are still an alternative, more cost-effective way to create the flap. The SCHWIND Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome is one of the most commonly used microkeratomes. The influence of different cutting parameters (head-advance speeds, cutting heads) on morphology of LASIK cuts was investigated. Setting: Experimental study performed at the University Eye Hospital of the Martin Luther University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. Methods: The Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome was used on freshly enucleated porcine eyes for lamellar keratotomy. After flap removal, the cutting edge and stromal bed were evaluated from scanning electron micrographs using an individualized scoring system. Four different settings of microkeratome parameters were compared. For each setting, eight cuts were evaluated (n=32). Results: Different oscillation frequencies and head-advance speeds did not influence the cutting qualities. A higher oscillation/feed rate ratio seemed to be advantageous for a smoother interface. Concerning different cuttings heads, a deeper keratotomy led to sharper cutting edges. The thinner the flap, the more irregularities in the stromal bed appeared. Complications did not occur. Conclusion: The Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome is a safe tool with which to create a LASIK flap and is a good alternative to a costly femtosecond laser. Deeper keratotomies, as well as the use of a higher oscillation/feed rate quotient, improve the cutting quality. Keywords: laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), microkeratome, stromal bed quality, surface regularity, Descemet&#39;s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), scanning electron microscopy (SEM)" @default.
• W2036724995 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2036724995 creator A5002915631 @default.
• W2036724995 creator A5007211341 @default.
• W2036724995 creator A5039438947 @default.
• W2036724995 creator A5040046173 @default.
• W2036724995 creator A5042070341 @default.
• W2036724995 creator A5052135826 @default.
• W2036724995 date "2013-12-01" @default.
• W2036724995 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2036724995 title "Influence of microkeratome parameters on the stromal bed and flap edge quality in laser in situ keratomileusis" @default.
• W2036724995 cites W131525425 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W146456707 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W1537140736 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W1966148303 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W1976906569 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W1983880900 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W1999930606 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2009385313 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2016960338 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2022295009 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2025624506 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2027260243 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2032128632 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2039486705 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2054904116 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2057682409 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2061657378 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2066924249 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2069327821 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2077075750 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2079083268 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2092983430 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2095194851 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2130875651 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2131140369 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2160515326 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2266287314 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2267450300 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2406843610 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2409293209 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2411846342 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2414597985 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W2791430934 @default.
• W2036724995 cites W326478501 @default.
• W2036724995 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s51200" @default.
• W2036724995 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3869919" @default.
• W2036724995 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24368878" @default.
• W2036724995 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2036724995 type Work @default.
• W2036724995 sameAs 2036724995 @default.
• W2036724995 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2036724995 countsByYear W20367249952014 @default.
• W2036724995 countsByYear W20367249952017 @default.
• W2036724995 countsByYear W20367249952018 @default.
• W2036724995 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2036724995 hasAuthorship W2036724995A5002915631 @default.
• W2036724995 hasAuthorship W2036724995A5007211341 @default.
• W2036724995 hasAuthorship W2036724995A5039438947 @default.
• W2036724995 hasAuthorship W2036724995A5040046173 @default.
• W2036724995 hasAuthorship W2036724995A5042070341 @default.
• W2036724995 hasAuthorship W2036724995A5052135826 @default.
• W2036724995 hasBestOaLocation W20367249951 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C2776882836 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C2778198633 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C2778609529 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C2780350528 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C118487528 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C119767625 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C120665830 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C121332964 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C2776882836 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C2778198633 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C2778609529 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C2780350528 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C520434653 @default.
• W2036724995 hasConceptScore W2036724995C71924100 @default.
• W2036724995 hasLocation W20367249951 @default.
• W2036724995 hasLocation W20367249952 @default.
• W2036724995 hasLocation W20367249953 @default.
• W2036724995 hasLocation W20367249954 @default.
• W2036724995 hasOpenAccess W2036724995 @default.
• W2036724995 hasPrimaryLocation W20367249951 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W1980546276 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2092403789 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2114703151 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2362816506 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2411974577 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2412938479 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2567412749 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2722378279 @default.
• W2036724995 hasRelatedWork W2945449068 @default.

• next