FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2036817663> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2036817663 endingPage "830" @default.
• W2036817663 startingPage "815" @default.
• W2036817663 abstract "We have developed a spatially inexplicit model of canopy photosynthesis for balsam fir (Abies balsamea(L.) Mill.) that accounts for key processes of light–shoot interaction including irradiance interception by the shoot, spatial aggregation of shoots into branches and crowns, the differential propagation of diffuse and direct light within the canopy, and an ideal representation of penumbra. Also accounted for in the model are the effects of the average radiative climate and shoot age on needle retention, light interception, and photosynthetic capacity. We used reduced versions of this model to quantify the effects of simplifying canopy representation on modeled canopy net photosynthesis. Simplifications explored were the omission of direct beam transformation into penumbral light and the use of different constant shoot properties throughout the canopy. The model was parameterized for a relatively dense balsam fir stand (leaf area index of 5.8) north of Québec City, Canada, and run using hourly meteorological data obtained at the site. The overall performance of the complete model was satisfactory, with maximum values of canopy net photosynthesis of 23 μmol (m2 ground)−1 s−1 (83 mmol m−2 h−1), and a near-saturation of the canopy at a photosynthetically active radiation photon flux density of about 750 μmol m−2 s−1 (2.7 mol m−2 h−1). The omission of penumbral effects through the use of unattenuated direct (beam) radiation at all layers of the canopy, as used for broad-leaved species, reduced canopy net photosynthesis by 3.7%. Analysis of the results show that the small impact of penumbra on canopy net photosynthesis stems from the high proportion of diffuse radiation (73%) estimated from our meteorological data set; single-hour results under clear sky conditions approach theoretical bias values of about 30%. Use of mean shoot photosynthetic, light capture and light transmission properties throughout the canopy biased canopy net photosynthesis by less than 3%. However, simulations carried out based on properties of 1-year-old shoots throughout the canopy overestimated canopy net photosynthesis by 9%. Use of the shoot as our smallest functional unit was a potential source of bias because the differential absorption of direct and diffuse radiation within the shoot could not be factored into the model. Other sources of potential bias are discussed." @default.
• W2036817663 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2036817663 creator A5004852705 @default.
• W2036817663 creator A5009147172 @default.
• W2036817663 creator A5064343602 @default.
• W2036817663 creator A5088876263 @default.
• W2036817663 date "2001-08-01" @default.
• W2036817663 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2036817663 title "Importance of needle age and shoot structure on canopy net photosynthesis of balsam fir (Abies balsamea): a spatially inexplicit modeling analysis" @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1492385346 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W153938189 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1966818077 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1969939898 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1970814968 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1972524489 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1974902368 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1974982441 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1985366236 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1986822350 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1988775509 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1991860361 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W1995103915 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2001952312 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2006966329 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2010735729 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2013416500 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2014322700 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2018080802 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2018213962 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2019165648 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2024138128 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2028570495 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2029984822 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2030437864 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2031738709 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2032132691 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2038278501 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2046597213 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2046878662 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2049301242 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2051948521 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2052291533 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2054533615 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2054790599 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2070779353 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2073383827 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2074568780 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2081205595 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2088292560 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2089835243 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2109682085 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2119281118 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2123892463 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2125491431 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2131858901 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2132614391 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2143523796 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2156108016 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2162613164 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2163701694 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2164330309 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2171423575 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2171575201 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2314805648 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2323663421 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2497254976 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2525922432 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2800262963 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W286286261 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2984126067 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W43139042 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W618147255 @default.
• W2036817663 cites W2463540037 @default.
• W2036817663 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.12-13.815" @default.
• W2036817663 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11498329" @default.
• W2036817663 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2036817663 type Work @default.
• W2036817663 sameAs 2036817663 @default.
• W2036817663 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632012 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632013 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632014 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632015 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632016 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632017 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632018 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632019 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632020 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632021 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632022 @default.
• W2036817663 countsByYear W20368176632023 @default.
• W2036817663 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2036817663 hasAuthorship W2036817663A5004852705 @default.
• W2036817663 hasAuthorship W2036817663A5009147172 @default.
• W2036817663 hasAuthorship W2036817663A5064343602 @default.
• W2036817663 hasAuthorship W2036817663A5088876263 @default.
• W2036817663 hasBestOaLocation W20368176631 @default.
• W2036817663 hasConcept C101000010 @default.

• next