FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2038409075> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2038409075 endingPage "960" @default.
• W2038409075 startingPage "939" @default.
• W2038409075 abstract "Of Caleb’s Guilt and Godwin’s Truth: Ideology and Ethics in Caleb Williams Gary Handwerk For a moralizing solution, like any essentializing gesture, serves the ideological function of masking the more difficult cultural and ethicopolitical issues. —Dominick LaCapra, History, Politics, and the Novel I Despite a recent resurgence of interest in his life and in certain of his works, William Godwin remains an elusive and little-noticed figure of English literary and intellectual history. Known as much for his personal links to other figures—to Wollstonecraft, Wordsworth, or Shelley—as for his own writing, Godwin remains largely unread except by specialists in the Jacobin period. At best, other critics may identify Godwin with the eccentric anarchism of his Enquiry Concerning Political Justice or the Gothic histrionics of Caleb Williams. Even if one gives full credit to work by more recent critics, literary criticism is still very far from doing justice to his work as a whole or overcoming long-nurtured suspicions about the quality and significance of much of his writing. It may in fact be true that Godwin’s novels show flashes of dramatic intensity rather than any sustained technical brilliance; his imaginative gifts may indeed be somewhat narrow in scope. Yet because literary history has often relied upon evaluative criteria that fit Godwin’s fictional practice poorly, it has tended to reinforce the marginalizing of his work accomplished by the anti-Jacobin reaction in England. That tendency seems all the more regrettable in that Godwin’s work has tremendous bearing on issues central to contemporary criticism, such as the relation of ideology to ethics in literature, or the relationship of subjectivity to interpretation and to history. Its narrative anomalies are themselves instructive about the complexity of the problems with which Godwin struggled in trying to shape an aesthetic form adequate to his political and ethical concerns. To be sure, the past few years have seen a renaissance of Godwin studies that has produced some outstanding analytical work—a renaissance traceable to the seminal work of Burton Pollin on the intellectual [End Page 939] coherence of Godwin’s ideas, to David McCracken’s work on Godwin’s literary theories and reedition of Caleb Williams, as well as to the discovery in 1966 of the original, previously unknown ending to Caleb Williams. 1 Since then, however, critical attention has focused almost exclusively on Political Justice and Caleb Williams, virtually neglecting Godwin’s other fiction and essays. 2 That focus, though regrettable for the narrow image it gives us of Godwin’s lifetime work, does rest on plausible premises, since much of the fascination of Godwin’s writing lies in his attempt to reconcile his vision of justice with highly realistic portraits of political psychology, a struggle most evident in the proximity of these two works to each other. Any reestimation of Godwin as a novelist, then, needs to begin by turning our attention back to Caleb Williams. Of particular interest is the way in which Godwin’s narrative choices, especially the revised ending, provide a developing commentary on his political values that takes him beyond the assumptions of Political Justice. My primary argument here is that the tendency of Caleb Williams, and indeed of all of Godwin’s fiction, runs fundamentally contrary to the explicit political assumptions and expectations of Political Justice —but, for that very reason, they need to be read in a complementary fashion as parts of a comprehensive perspective. Though Godwin may well have begun this novel hoping to exemplify his political ideals in dramatic form, his own narrative and psychological realism transformed the fiction into a much more sceptical mediation on the possibilities for political amelioration through reason. His careful attention to the working of ideology in an individual mind, Caleb’s, led him to complicate his rationalist model of political justice and political change, anticipating the internal critique of his own political theory that comes more and more into evidence in his subsequent writing. To perceive this, however, we need to bear in mind the diverse tendencies present in the novel, and in fact, to read past the moral overtly proffered by Caleb himself. 3 If we attend to its multiple resonances, Godwin’s..." @default.
• W2038409075 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2038409075 creator A5028272923 @default.
• W2038409075 date "1993-01-01" @default.
• W2038409075 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2038409075 title "Of Caleb's Guilt and Godwin's Truth: Ideology and Ethics in Caleb Williams" @default.
• W2038409075 cites W1479937945 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W1531112036 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W1555064646 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W1974512878 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2054277388 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2072977204 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2076676832 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2139036392 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2320527440 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2512251867 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2529142605 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2797021314 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2797417414 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2797550882 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2802276243 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W2802948576 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W431951218 @default.
• W2038409075 cites W621936639 @default.
• W2038409075 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.1993.0003" @default.
• W2038409075 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W2038409075 type Work @default.
• W2038409075 sameAs 2038409075 @default.
• W2038409075 citedByCount "83" @default.
• W2038409075 countsByYear W20384090752012 @default.
• W2038409075 countsByYear W20384090752013 @default.
• W2038409075 countsByYear W20384090752014 @default.
• W2038409075 countsByYear W20384090752015 @default.
• W2038409075 countsByYear W20384090752018 @default.
• W2038409075 countsByYear W20384090752020 @default.
• W2038409075 countsByYear W20384090752022 @default.
• W2038409075 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2038409075 hasAuthorship W2038409075A5028272923 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C2779634276 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C2994315291 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C107038049 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C124952713 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C138885662 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C139621336 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C142362112 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C158071213 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C17744445 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C199539241 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C2779634276 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C2994315291 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C7991579 @default.
• W2038409075 hasConceptScore W2038409075C94625758 @default.
• W2038409075 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2038409075 hasLocation W20384090751 @default.
• W2038409075 hasOpenAccess W2038409075 @default.
• W2038409075 hasPrimaryLocation W20384090751 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2041824182 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2347851714 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2348140914 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2350568557 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2353147335 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2371879509 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2373952588 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2376809335 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2390852350 @default.
• W2038409075 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2038409075 hasVolume "60" @default.
• W2038409075 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2038409075 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2038409075 magId "2038409075" @default.
• W2038409075 workType "article" @default.