FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2038546009> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2038546009 endingPage "250" @default.
• W2038546009 startingPage "244" @default.
• W2038546009 abstract "Mechanical forces have been considered responsible for stress shielding an arthrodesis, but the biology of a developing lumbar fusion has not been well characterized.A large animal model was used to test the hypothesis that mechanical forces modify the biological processes involved in a developing bony fusion.Lumbar fusion was performed in an ovine model using custom instrumentation that permitted a controlled degree of anterior-posterior translation after surgery. Fusion sites were evaluated by radiography, microradiography, histology and histomorphometry at time points that corresponded with predicted early and later stages of bone healing.Fourteen skeletally mature ewes underwent lumbar spinal fusion under general anesthesia. In the control (stable) group, the spine was rigidly fixed with a cage anteriorly and pedicle screws posteriorly. In the experimental (unstable) group, the spine was destabilized by an annulectomy (with no anterior implant) and custom pedicle screws that allowed 2 mm of anterior-posterior translation. Animals were euthanized 6 and 12 weeks after surgery.Radiographs confirmed that the fusion mass had not fully consolidated at either time point. Microradiographs revealed a trend toward increased bone formation at 6 weeks in the stable case as compared with the unstable, but by 12 weeks, this trend had reversed (p=.03). Intramembranous bone formation was the primary mechanism of healing near the transverse process in animals with both stable and unstable fixation. In the area between the two transverse processes, new bone formation occurred primarily through endochondral ossification. At 12 weeks, the stable case had significantly more cartilage formed (p=.023) but less newly formed bone (p=.07) as compared with the quantitatively unstable.This clinically realistic animal model allowed characterization of the biology of the developing arthrodesis before fusion. Under stable or unstable conditions, endochondral ossification was the predominant mechanism of new bone formation within the intertransverse process region. This finding, which contrasts with previous reports from small animal models of spine fusion, may reflect a difference in biology that results from the increased size of the intertransverse space in sheep as compared with small animals. Interestingly, mechanical instability increased the formation of new bone within this region, but not at the transverse process. Endochondral ossification therefore appears to respond to mechanical factors in the fusion site. The ovine model shows promise as an alternative to the rabbit model and may provide a more stringent test for potential new surgical and nonsurgical strategies for spine fusion." @default.
• W2038546009 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2038546009 creator A5009061075 @default.
• W2038546009 creator A5017573791 @default.
• W2038546009 creator A5024257561 @default.
• W2038546009 creator A5029595070 @default.
• W2038546009 creator A5046016577 @default.
• W2038546009 creator A5046405241 @default.
• W2038546009 creator A5067310685 @default.
• W2038546009 date "2002-07-01" @default.
• W2038546009 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2038546009 title "Characterization of a developing lumbar arthrodesis in a sheep model with quantitative instability" @default.
• W2038546009 cites W1946096870 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W1963870755 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W1981623639 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2009646134 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2012045560 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2012773085 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2017382592 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2022096100 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2030122027 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2034194187 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2037788102 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2065913782 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2234497788 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W2334573076 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W3082030516 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W4293876749 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W4295681930 @default.
• W2038546009 cites W4360795073 @default.
• W2038546009 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00189-4" @default.
• W2038546009 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14589474" @default.
• W2038546009 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2038546009 type Work @default.
• W2038546009 sameAs 2038546009 @default.
• W2038546009 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092012 @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092016 @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092017 @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092018 @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092019 @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092020 @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092021 @default.
• W2038546009 countsByYear W20385460092022 @default.
• W2038546009 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2038546009 hasAuthorship W2038546009A5009061075 @default.
• W2038546009 hasAuthorship W2038546009A5017573791 @default.
• W2038546009 hasAuthorship W2038546009A5024257561 @default.
• W2038546009 hasAuthorship W2038546009A5029595070 @default.
• W2038546009 hasAuthorship W2038546009A5046016577 @default.
• W2038546009 hasAuthorship W2038546009A5046405241 @default.
• W2038546009 hasAuthorship W2038546009A5067310685 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C17938293 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2778842504 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2778985418 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2780550940 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2781298600 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C2909598534 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C105702510 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C141071460 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C142724271 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C146249460 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C17938293 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C204787440 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2778842504 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2778985418 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2780375110 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2780550940 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2781298600 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2781411149 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2908647359 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C2909598534 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C36454342 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C44575665 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C71924100 @default.
• W2038546009 hasConceptScore W2038546009C99454951 @default.
• W2038546009 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2038546009 hasLocation W20385460091 @default.
• W2038546009 hasLocation W20385460092 @default.
• W2038546009 hasOpenAccess W2038546009 @default.
• W2038546009 hasPrimaryLocation W20385460091 @default.
• W2038546009 hasRelatedWork W1179304734 @default.
• W2038546009 hasRelatedWork W1982623122 @default.
• W2038546009 hasRelatedWork W2023916158 @default.
• W2038546009 hasRelatedWork W2024225827 @default.
• W2038546009 hasRelatedWork W2032047469 @default.

• next