FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2038606772> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2038606772 endingPage "873" @default.
• W2038606772 startingPage "867" @default.
• W2038606772 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Sep 2013High Diagnostic Ability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Anterior Prostate Cancer Missed by Transrectal 12-Core Biopsy Yoshinobu Komai, Noboru Numao, Soichiro Yoshida, Yoh Matsuoka, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Chikako Ishii, Fumitaka Koga, Kazutaka Saito, Hitoshi Masuda, Yasuhisa Fujii, Satoru Kawakami, and Kazunori Kihara Yoshinobu KomaiYoshinobu Komai More articles by this author , Noboru NumaoNoboru Numao More articles by this author , Soichiro YoshidaSoichiro Yoshida More articles by this author , Yoh MatsuokaYoh Matsuoka More articles by this author , Yasukazu NakanishiYasukazu Nakanishi More articles by this author , Chikako IshiiChikako Ishii More articles by this author , Fumitaka KogaFumitaka Koga More articles by this author , Kazutaka SaitoKazutaka Saito More articles by this author , Hitoshi MasudaHitoshi Masuda More articles by this author , Yasuhisa FujiiYasuhisa Fujii More articles by this author , Satoru KawakamiSatoru Kawakami More articles by this author , and Kazunori KiharaKazunori Kihara More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.078AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We clarified the diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to reveal anterior cancer missed by transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy based on the results of 3-dimensional 26-core prostate biopsy, which is a combination of transrectal 12-core and transperineal 14-core biopsies. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 324 patients who prospectively underwent prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and then 3-dimensional 26-core prostate biopsy at a single institution. We defined transrectal 12-core negative cancer as cancer detected by transperineal 14-core but not transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. We focused on cancer in the anterior region. Any findings suspicious for malignancy in the region anterior to the urethra on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging were defined as an anterior lesion on imaging. Significant cancer was defined as a biopsy Gleason score of 4 + 3 or greater, a greater than 20% positive core and/or a maximum cancer length of 5 mm or greater. Associations between an anterior lesion on imaging and transrectal 12-core negative cancer were investigated. Results: The overall cancer detection rate on 3-dimensional 26-core prostate biopsy was 39% (128 of 324 cases), of which 28% (36 of 128) were transrectal 12-core negative cancers. An anterior lesion on prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was identified in 20% of men overall (65 of 324). Of men with and without an anterior lesion on imaging 40% (26 of 65) and 3.8% (10 of 259), respectively, had transrectal 12-core negative cancer. Significant transrectal 12-core negative cancer was observed in 0.4% (1 of 259 men) without an anterior lesion on imaging. Prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging revealed an anterior lesion in 92% of cases (11 of 12) of significant transrectal 12-core negative cancer. Conclusions: Prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to efficiently select men who could advantageously undergo anterior samplings, in addition to transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. References 1 : Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol2006; 175: 1605. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol2009; 55: 600. Google Scholar 3 : Importance of peripheral biopsies in maximising the detection of early prostate cancer in repeat 12-core biopsy protocols. BJU Int2006; 98: 559. Google Scholar 4 : Importance of additional “extreme” anterior apical needle biopsies in the initial detection of prostate cancer. Urology2010; 75: 1034. Google Scholar 5 : Understanding the pathological features of focality, grade and tumour volume of early-stage prostate cancer as a foundation for parenchyma-sparing prostate cancer therapies: active surveillance and focal targeted therapy. BJU Int2011; 108: 1074. Google Scholar 6 : ‘Prostatic evasive anterior tumours’: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. BJU Int2010; 105: 1231. Google Scholar 7 : Three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal biopsies for efficient detection of stage T1c prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol2006; 11: 127. Google Scholar 8 : Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int2011; 108: E171. Google Scholar 9 : Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol2010; 183: 520. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol2007; 51: 675. Google Scholar 11 : Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol2007; 52: 1663. Google Scholar 12 : ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol2012; 22: 746. Google Scholar 13 : Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol2011; 59: 477. Google Scholar 14 : Simple and effective local anesthesia for transperineal extended prostate biopsy: Application to three-dimensional 26-core biopsy. Int J Urol2009; 16: 420. Google Scholar 15 : The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol2005; 29: 1228. Google Scholar 16 : Prospective comparison of T2w-MRI and dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI, 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging or diffusion-weighted MRI in repeat TRUS-guided biopsies. Eur Radiol2012; 20: 2781. Google Scholar 17 : Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy. Clin Cancer Res2010; 16: 1875. Google Scholar 18 : Combined MP-MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology2011; 78: 1356. Google Scholar 19 : Role of MRI in minimally invasive focal ablative therapy for prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol2011; 197: W90. Google Scholar 20 : High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int2012; 110: 993. Google Scholar 21 : A retrospective analysis illustrating the substantial clinical and economic burden of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis2010; 13: 162. Google Scholar 22 : Treatment costs of prostate cancer in the first year after diagnosis: a short-term cost of illness study for France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. BJU Int2010; 105: 49. Google Scholar 23 : Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol2012; 22: 328. Google Scholar 24 : Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol2013; 63: 125. Google Scholar 25 : Prognostic significance of prostate cancer originating from the transition zone. Urol Oncol2009; 27: 592. Google Scholar Department of Urology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University and Department of Radiology, Ochanomizu Surugadai Clinic (CI), Tokyo, Japan© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byEricson K, Wu S, Lundy S, Thomas L, Klein E and McKenney J (2019) Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Biopsy for Detecting Cribriform Gleason Pattern 4 Carcinoma and Intraductal Carcinoma in Paired Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active SurveillanceJournal of Urology, VOL. 203, NO. 2, (311-319), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020.Lee D, Recabal P, Sjoberg D, Thong A, Lee J, Eastham J, Scardino P, Vargas H, Coleman J and Ehdaie B (2016) Comparative Effectiveness of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Software and Visual Targeting: a Prospective StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 3, (697-702), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.Zhou Z, Yan W and Ji Z (2016) Re: Transperineal Template Guided Prostate Biopsy Selects Candidates for Active Surveillance—How Many Cores are Enough?Journal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 5, (1624-1625), Online publication date: 1-May-2016.Song S, Pak S, Park S, Song C, Jeong I, Choi H, Kim J, Cho K, Kim C and Ahn H (2014) Predictors of Unfavorable Disease after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients at Low Risk by D'Amico Criteria: Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 2, (402-408), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014.Sundi D, Kryvenko O, Carter H, Ross A, Epstein J and Schaeffer E (2013) Pathological Examination of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Men with Very Low Risk Disease at Biopsy Reveals Distinct Zonal Distribution of Cancer in Black American MenJournal of Urology, VOL. 191, NO. 1, (60-67), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Volume 190Issue 3September 2013Page: 867-873Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsbiopsydiagnostic imagingmagnetic resonance imagingdiagnosisprostateAcknowledgmentsDr. Jiro Kumagai, Department of Pathology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School, made the pathological diagnosis.MetricsAuthor Information Yoshinobu Komai More articles by this author Noboru Numao More articles by this author Soichiro Yoshida More articles by this author Yoh Matsuoka More articles by this author Yasukazu Nakanishi More articles by this author Chikako Ishii More articles by this author Fumitaka Koga More articles by this author Kazutaka Saito More articles by this author Hitoshi Masuda More articles by this author Yasuhisa Fujii More articles by this author Satoru Kawakami More articles by this author Kazunori Kihara More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2038606772 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5006179968 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5006217384 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5015291340 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5022477543 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5031050928 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5039314030 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5048350768 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5049546038 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5060240988 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5081085839 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5088037725 @default.
• W2038606772 creator A5089503656 @default.
• W2038606772 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W2038606772 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2038606772 title "High Diagnostic Ability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Anterior Prostate Cancer Missed by Transrectal 12-Core Biopsy" @default.
• W2038606772 cites W1558392243 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W1589956260 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W1591480142 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W1821430804 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W1975415979 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W1982315255 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W1983419716 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2033882691 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2042705148 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2049971872 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2067053628 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2070070316 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2081651915 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2081830150 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2083043726 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2084537067 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2090868645 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2109071787 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2115895082 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2124539070 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2128206183 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2132019398 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2135998122 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2137380457 @default.
• W2038606772 cites W2170853534 @default.
• W2038606772 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.078" @default.
• W2038606772 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23542406" @default.
• W2038606772 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2038606772 type Work @default.
• W2038606772 sameAs 2038606772 @default.
• W2038606772 citedByCount "60" @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722014 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722015 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722016 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722017 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722018 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722019 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722020 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722021 @default.
• W2038606772 countsByYear W20386067722022 @default.
• W2038606772 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5006179968 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5006217384 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5015291340 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5022477543 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5031050928 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5039314030 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5048350768 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5049546038 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5060240988 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5081085839 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5088037725 @default.
• W2038606772 hasAuthorship W2038606772A5089503656 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C2164484 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C3019914693 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C121608353 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C126322002 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C126838900 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C143409427 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C159985019 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C192562407 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C2164484 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C2775934546 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C2776235491 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C2780192828 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C2989005 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C3019914693 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C530470458 @default.
• W2038606772 hasConceptScore W2038606772C71924100 @default.

• next