FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2038746472> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2038746472 endingPage "370" @default.
• W2038746472 startingPage "366" @default.
• W2038746472 abstract "Introduction. Ropivacaine is used in orthopedcs, gyneacology, surgery, ophtamology, whereas experience about its usage in dentistry is still limited. The aim of this research was to compare the anesthetic effect between local anesthetics ropivacaine and bupivacaine, in surgical disposals of chronical periapical lessions in maxilla. Material and methods. The study included the patients that had indications for surgical removal of chronical periapical lessions at one of the frontal teeth of upper jaw. The total total number of examinees was 60, and they were devided in two groups. Ropivacaine chloride (0.75%) was used as a local anesthetic in one group (Naropin? 0,75%; Astra Zeneca), and in the other one bupivacaine chloride (0.5%) (Vexelit? 0,5%; Zdravlje). The autors applied 1,8 ml of block anesthesia for the n. infraorbitalis (intraoral approach) as well as 0,2 ml of the local anesthetic from the palatine side for the final branches of n. nasopalatinus in order to observe the folloving anesthetic parameters. I. Beginning of anesthesia was followed by the appearence of upper lip numbness. II. Pain rating scale according to Sisk was used for the objective measurement of the anesthesia quality. III. The pain intensity during the intervention was measured by visual analogous scale, on which the patient denoted the intensity of pain he had felt during the intervention. IV. Duration of anesthetic effect - it is followed by soft tissues numbness. Results and discussion. After the ropivacaine application anesthesia effect started in 1.57 min. and after the usage of bupivacaine in 1.67 min. The mean duration of soft tissue numbness after the application of ropivacaine was 321 minutes. Bupivacaine had a shorter anesthetic effect - 296.5 minutes. The quality of anesthesia after the usage of ropivacaine was assessed by the surgeons with average mark - 1.76. Interventions in which this anesthetic was used were performed with minimal pain and without additional anesthesia. The quality of anesthesia after the usage of bupivacaine (3.03) was statistically much worse (p<0.01) in comparison to ropivacaine. In visual analogous scale where patients denoted the intensity of pain during the intervention with ropivacaine the marked average value was 30.1 mm while the average value with usage of bupivacaine was 41.7 mm. The patients from the control group, where bupivacaine was used, had much stronger pain, statistically significant (p<0.05) in comparison to the group where ropivacaine was used. Our results show that the quality of anesthesia that was attained with 0,5% bupivacaine was much worse than the quality of anesthesia after the application of 0,75% ropivacaine. Conclusion. Ropivacaine has a potential to replace bupivacaine completely in cases when there is the indication for its usage in oral surgery (longlasting intervention, interventions followed by intensive postoperational pain, nerve blockade)." @default.
• W2038746472 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2038746472 creator A5061150161 @default.
• W2038746472 creator A5066839364 @default.
• W2038746472 creator A5073678755 @default.
• W2038746472 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2038746472 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2038746472 title "Evaluation of anesthetic effect of ropivacaine in surgery of chronic periapical lessions" @default.
• W2038746472 cites W1963725207 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W1964392630 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W1973235070 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W1988876210 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W1989762909 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W1990093871 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2016032252 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2023329695 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2026617667 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2031869589 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2032224793 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2034151395 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2046477374 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2046673883 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2056590667 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2097588686 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W2101704539 @default.
• W2038746472 cites W4253692437 @default.
• W2038746472 doi "https://doi.org/10.2298/mpns1006366t" @default.
• W2038746472 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21186548" @default.
• W2038746472 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2038746472 type Work @default.
• W2038746472 sameAs 2038746472 @default.
• W2038746472 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2038746472 countsByYear W20387464722013 @default.
• W2038746472 countsByYear W20387464722014 @default.
• W2038746472 countsByYear W20387464722017 @default.
• W2038746472 countsByYear W20387464722019 @default.
• W2038746472 countsByYear W20387464722021 @default.
• W2038746472 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2038746472 hasAuthorship W2038746472A5061150161 @default.
• W2038746472 hasAuthorship W2038746472A5066839364 @default.
• W2038746472 hasAuthorship W2038746472A5073678755 @default.
• W2038746472 hasBestOaLocation W20387464721 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C2776742690 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C2778162923 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C2778994108 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C2780269707 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C2781328992 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C141071460 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C14184104 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C199343813 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C2776742690 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C2778162923 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C2778994108 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C2780269707 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C2781328992 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C42219234 @default.
• W2038746472 hasConceptScore W2038746472C71924100 @default.
• W2038746472 hasIssue "5-6" @default.
• W2038746472 hasLocation W20387464721 @default.
• W2038746472 hasLocation W20387464722 @default.
• W2038746472 hasOpenAccess W2038746472 @default.
• W2038746472 hasPrimaryLocation W20387464721 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W1974062125 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W2095219473 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W2160611829 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W2377318027 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W2947539016 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W2963788614 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W4247450932 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W4247798936 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W598415708 @default.
• W2038746472 hasRelatedWork W118141465 @default.
• W2038746472 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W2038746472 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2038746472 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2038746472 magId "2038746472" @default.
• W2038746472 workType "article" @default.