Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2038751924> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2038751924 endingPage "1484" @default.
- W2038751924 startingPage "1477" @default.
- W2038751924 abstract "In Brief Study Design. Randomized clinical trial. Objectives. To document the types and frequencies of adverse reactions associated with the most common chiropractic treatments for neck pain, and to identify possible clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic treatment. Summary of Background Data. Chiropractic care is frequently sought by patients for relief from neck pain; however, adverse reactions related to its primary modes of treatment have not been well examined. Methods. A total of 336 patients with neck pain presenting to 4 southern California health care clinics were randomized in a balanced 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design to manipulation with or without heat, and with or without electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and mobilization with or without heat and with or without EMS. Discomfort or unpleasant reactions from chiropractic care were self-assessed at 2 weeks after the randomization/baseline visit. Results. Of the 280 participants (83%) who responded, 85 (30.4%) had 212 adverse symptoms as a result of chiropractic care. Increased neck pain or stiffness was the most common symptom, reported by 25% of the participants. Less common were headache and radiating pain. Patients randomized to manipulation were more likely than those randomized to mobilization to have an adverse symptom occurring within 24 hours of treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83, 2.49). Heat and EMS were only weakly associated with adverse symptoms (heat: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.54, 1.62; EMS: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.63, 1.89). Moderate-to-severe neck disability at baseline was strongly associated with adverse neurologic symptoms (OR = 5.70, 95% CI = 1.49, 21.80). Conclusions. Our results suggest that adverse reactions to chiropractic care for neck pain are common andthat despite somewhat imprecise estimation, adverse reactions appear more likely to follow cervical spine manipulation than mobilization. Given the possible higher risk of adverse reactions and lack of demonstrated effectiveness of manipulation over mobilization, chiropractors should consider a conservative approach for applying manipulation to their patients, especially those with severe neck pain. Adverse reactions to chiropractic care for neck pain are common and appear more likely to follow cervical spine manipulation than mobilization. Mobilization rather than manipulation may be the more appropriate first-line therapy." @default.
- W2038751924 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2038751924 creator A5007016271 @default.
- W2038751924 creator A5007299590 @default.
- W2038751924 creator A5020134413 @default.
- W2038751924 creator A5067035898 @default.
- W2038751924 date "2005-07-01" @default.
- W2038751924 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2038751924 title "Frequency and Clinical Predictors of Adverse Reactions to Chiropractic Care in the UCLA Neck Pain Study" @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1856358012 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1951090946 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1967242121 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1967276177 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1973301958 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1982257520 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1984998159 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W1995306377 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2012510197 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2022909531 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2028778176 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2028896626 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2030711540 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2046722484 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2052304591 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2061604337 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2072617756 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2078142284 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2078242628 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2079009702 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2081679291 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2082868124 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2087312159 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2103366902 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2131747265 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2132644789 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2140303590 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2329307791 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W2530377595 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W4244195219 @default.
- W2038751924 cites W4292806894 @default.
- W2038751924 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000167821.39373.c1" @default.
- W2038751924 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15990659" @default.
- W2038751924 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2038751924 type Work @default.
- W2038751924 sameAs 2038751924 @default.
- W2038751924 citedByCount "121" @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242012 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242013 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242014 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242015 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242016 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242017 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242018 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242019 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242020 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242021 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242022 @default.
- W2038751924 countsByYear W20387519242023 @default.
- W2038751924 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2038751924 hasAuthorship W2038751924A5007016271 @default.
- W2038751924 hasAuthorship W2038751924A5007299590 @default.
- W2038751924 hasAuthorship W2038751924A5020134413 @default.
- W2038751924 hasAuthorship W2038751924A5067035898 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C2779470654 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C2781038967 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C514863369 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C516994506 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C126322002 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C142724271 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C156957248 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C168563851 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C1862650 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C197934379 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C204243189 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C204787440 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C2779470654 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C2780907711 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C2781038967 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C44249647 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C514863369 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C516994506 @default.
- W2038751924 hasConceptScore W2038751924C71924100 @default.
- W2038751924 hasIssue "13" @default.
- W2038751924 hasLocation W20387519241 @default.
- W2038751924 hasLocation W20387519242 @default.
- W2038751924 hasOpenAccess W2038751924 @default.
- W2038751924 hasPrimaryLocation W20387519241 @default.