FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2038923091> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2038923091 endingPage "315" @default.
• W2038923091 startingPage "309" @default.
• W2038923091 abstract "Rationale and Objectives To retrospectively determine the value of a volumetric ventricle analysis for the assessment of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) by using image data from non-electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA). Materials and Methods Hypothesizing that the presence of PE and the embolus location correlated with right ventricular dysfunction, we retrospectively analyzed 100 non–ECG-gated pulmonary CTA datasets of patients with central, peripheral, and without PE. Right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) diameter ratio measured in transverse sections (RV/LVtrans), four-chamber view (RV/LV4ch), and RV/LV volume ratio (RV/LVvol) were assessed on CT images. The results were correlated with the embolus location, the 30-day mortality rate, and the necessity of intensive care treatment. Results All CT parameters showed statistically significant differences between all patients groups depended on embolus location. The receiver operating characteristic analysis RV/LVvol showed the strongest discriminatory power to differ between patients with central and without PE and between patients with central and peripheral PE (central PE vs. no PE: RV/LVvol = 0.932, RV/LVtrans = 0.880, and RV/LV4ch = 0.811, central PE vs. peripheral PE: RV/LVvol = 0.950, RV/LVtrans = 0.849, and RV/LV4ch = 0.881), indicating a correlation with embolus location predisposing for RVD. For the identification of high-risk patients with PE all three CT parameters showed statistically significant values (P < .0001), whereas in the receiver operating characteristic analysis, RV/LVvol had the strongest discriminatory power (RV/LVvol = 0.819, RV/LVtrans = 0.799, and RV/LV4ch = 0.758). Conclusion Ventricle volumetry of non–ECG-gated CTA allows the assessment of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute PE. Compared to unidimensional measurements, a volumetric analysis seems to be slightly superior to identify high-risk patients with adverse clinical outcome. However, the method is more time consuming and requires dedicated software tools compared to unidimensional parameters, which is disadvantageous in an emergency setting. To retrospectively determine the value of a volumetric ventricle analysis for the assessment of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) by using image data from non-electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA). Hypothesizing that the presence of PE and the embolus location correlated with right ventricular dysfunction, we retrospectively analyzed 100 non–ECG-gated pulmonary CTA datasets of patients with central, peripheral, and without PE. Right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) diameter ratio measured in transverse sections (RV/LVtrans), four-chamber view (RV/LV4ch), and RV/LV volume ratio (RV/LVvol) were assessed on CT images. The results were correlated with the embolus location, the 30-day mortality rate, and the necessity of intensive care treatment. All CT parameters showed statistically significant differences between all patients groups depended on embolus location. The receiver operating characteristic analysis RV/LVvol showed the strongest discriminatory power to differ between patients with central and without PE and between patients with central and peripheral PE (central PE vs. no PE: RV/LVvol = 0.932, RV/LVtrans = 0.880, and RV/LV4ch = 0.811, central PE vs. peripheral PE: RV/LVvol = 0.950, RV/LVtrans = 0.849, and RV/LV4ch = 0.881), indicating a correlation with embolus location predisposing for RVD. For the identification of high-risk patients with PE all three CT parameters showed statistically significant values (P < .0001), whereas in the receiver operating characteristic analysis, RV/LVvol had the strongest discriminatory power (RV/LVvol = 0.819, RV/LVtrans = 0.799, and RV/LV4ch = 0.758). Ventricle volumetry of non–ECG-gated CTA allows the assessment of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute PE. Compared to unidimensional measurements, a volumetric analysis seems to be slightly superior to identify high-risk patients with adverse clinical outcome. However, the method is more time consuming and requires dedicated software tools compared to unidimensional parameters, which is disadvantageous in an emergency setting." @default.
• W2038923091 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2038923091 creator A5030609819 @default.
• W2038923091 creator A5037688873 @default.
• W2038923091 creator A5047758147 @default.
• W2038923091 creator A5054676191 @default.
• W2038923091 creator A5057769816 @default.
• W2038923091 creator A5075228342 @default.
• W2038923091 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W2038923091 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2038923091 title "Volumetric Analysis of Pulmonary CTA for the Assessment of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism" @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1533950052 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1967035311 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1969992146 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1972070393 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1983438237 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1994958633 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1995792758 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W1997085220 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2005050520 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2013400266 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2025384111 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2032953361 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2042750686 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2049760148 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2065015980 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2069707425 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2070780483 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2074416414 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2081187499 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2082998844 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2083027330 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2085654280 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2091094122 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2092632390 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2095728038 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2097055290 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2097620552 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2102535207 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2104433492 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2115055475 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2115404307 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2125364389 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2134277882 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2144242797 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2171219646 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2316533920 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W2400240907 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W4253137480 @default.
• W2038923091 cites W4361868971 @default.
• W2038923091 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.022" @default.
• W2038923091 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20152725" @default.
• W2038923091 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2038923091 type Work @default.
• W2038923091 sameAs 2038923091 @default.
• W2038923091 citedByCount "40" @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912012 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912013 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912014 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912015 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912016 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912017 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912018 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912019 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912022 @default.
• W2038923091 countsByYear W20389230912023 @default.
• W2038923091 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2038923091 hasAuthorship W2038923091A5030609819 @default.
• W2038923091 hasAuthorship W2038923091A5037688873 @default.
• W2038923091 hasAuthorship W2038923091A5047758147 @default.
• W2038923091 hasAuthorship W2038923091A5054676191 @default.
• W2038923091 hasAuthorship W2038923091A5057769816 @default.
• W2038923091 hasAuthorship W2038923091A5075228342 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C2776265017 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C2778342025 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C2778921608 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C2780149156 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C2911010281 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C46762472 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C126322002 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C126838900 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C164705383 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C2776265017 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C2778342025 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C2778921608 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C2780149156 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C2911010281 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C2989005 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C46762472 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C58471807 @default.
• W2038923091 hasConceptScore W2038923091C71924100 @default.
• W2038923091 hasIssue "3" @default.

• next