FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2039117274> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2039117274 endingPage "23" @default.
• W2039117274 startingPage "15" @default.
• W2039117274 abstract "Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. Aon Benfield, Annual Global Climate and Catastrophe Report: 2012 (Chicago, IL: Aon Benfield Impact Forecasting, 2013). http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20130124_if_annual_global_climate_catastrophe_report.pdf 2. Munich Re, “Topics Geo. Natural Catastrophes 2012, Report” (Munich, Germany: Munich Re, 2013). 3.H. Kunreuther, R. Ginsberg, L. Miller, P. Sagi, P. Slovic, B. Borkan and N. Katz, Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons (New York, NY: Wiley, 1978). 4. R. Palm, M. Hodgson R. D. Blanchard, and D. Lyons, Earthquake Insurance in California: Environmental Policy and Individual Decision Making (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990). 5. R. J. Burby, S. Bollens, E. J. Kaise, D. Mullan, and J. R. Sheaffer, Cities Under Water: A Comparative Evaluation of Ten Cities' Efforts to Manage Floodplain Land Use (Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1988). 6. S. B. Laska, “Floodproof Retrofitting: Homeowner Self-Protective Behavior” (Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1991). 7. A. Goodnough, “As Hurricane Season Looms, State Aim to Scare,” The New York Times, May 31, 2006. 8. E. J. Baker, J. Czajkowski, and R. Meyer, “Modeling the Real-Time Decision to Evacuate from a Hurricane,” Working Paper, Wharton Risk Management Center, The Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA, 2012. 9. R. Burby, “Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604 (2006): 171–191. 10. C. Colten and A. Giancario, “Losing Resilience on the Gulf Coast: Hurricanes and Social Memory,” Environment 53 (2011): 4, 6–19. 11. D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011). 12. G. F. Loewenstein, E. U. Weber, C. K. Hsee, and N. Welch, “Risk as Feelings,” Psychological Bulletin 127 (2001): 267–286. 13. H. Kunreuther, R. Meyer, and E. Michel-Kerjan, “Overcoming Decision Biases to Reduce Losses from Natural Catastrophes,” chapter 23, pp. 398-413, in E. Shafir, ed., Behavioral Foundations of Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013). 14. G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec, “Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, no. 2 (1992): 573–597. 15. D. Laibson, “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1997): 443–478. 16. G. McClelland, W. Schulze, and D. Coursey, “Insurance for Low-Probability Hazards: A Bimodal Response to Unlikely Events,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 (1993): 95–116. 17. H. C. Kunreuther, M. V. Pauly, and S. McMorrow, Insurance and Behavioral Economics: Improving Decisions in the Most Misunderstood Industry (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013). 18. H. Kunreuther and E. Michel-Kerjan, At War with the Weather (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011). 19. To keep the example simple we are assuming that insurance provides full coverage against future losses. In reality there will be a deductible so that the property owner will pay for some of the losses. We also assume reconstruction costs to be stable over time. 20. P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, “Accident Probabilities and Seat Belt Usage: A Psychological Perspective,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 10 (1978): 281–285. 21. N. Weinstein, K. Kolb, and B. Goldstein, “Using Time Intervals Between Expected Events to Communicate Risk Magnitudes,” Risk Analysis 16 (1996): 305–308. 22. E. Johnson, J. Hershey, J. Meszaros, and H. Kunreuther, “Framing, Probability Distortions, and Insurance Decisions,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 (1993) 35–51. 23. More recent building codes were established in 2004, then in 2007. See www.FloridaBuilding.org. 24. Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS), “The Benefits of Modern Wind Resistant Building Codes on Hurricane Claim Frequency and Severity—A Summary Report” (Tampa, FL: Institute for Business and Home Safety, 2007). 25. Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS), Rating the States: An Assessment of Residential Building Codes and Enforcement Systems for Life Safety and Property Protection in Hurricane Prone Regions (Tampa FL: 2012). 26. Insurance Institute for Property Loss Reduction, Homes and Hurricanes: Public Opinion Concerning Various Issues Relating to Home Builders, Building Codes and Damage Mitigation (Boston, MA: IIPLR, 1995). 27. Tax incentive programs such as this one should encourage homeowners to take out a larger deductible on their insurance policy and contribute more to the Catastrophe Savings Account. In the process they pay lower insurance premiums and lower taxes at the same time. The insurer benefits by having lower claims following a disaster. If many homeowners take advantage of this program by raising their deductible, the insurer's catastrophic exposure could be significantly reduced. 28. Under the Stafford Act, the federal government covers 75% of the losses to public infrastructure. 29. E. Michel-Kerjan and J. Volkman Wise, “The Risk of Ever-Growing Disaster Relief Expectations,” paper presented at the annual NBER Insurance Group conference, Cambridge, MA, September 2011, http://nber.org/confer/2011/INSf11/Michel-Kerjan_Volkman_Wise.pdf. 30. E. Michel-Kerjan, “Catastrophe Economics: The National Flood Insurance Program,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, (2010): 4, 165–186. 31. R. King, “The National Flood Insurance Program: Status and Remaining Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, R42850 (2013), p. 6, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42850.pdf 32. E. Michel-Kerjan, S. Lemoyne de Forges, and H. Kunreuther, “Policy Tenure Under the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program,” Risk Analysis 32 (2012) 4, 644–658. 33. W. Kriesel and C. Landry, “Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program: An Empirical Analysis for Coastal Properties,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 71 (2004): 3, 405–420. 34. L. Dixon, N. Clancy, S. A. Seabury, and A. Overton, “The National Flood Insurance Program's Market Penetration Rate: Estimates and Policy Implications” (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2006). 35. More details on FEMA's Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFE) program can be found at http://www.region2coastal.com/faqs/advisory-bfe-faq 36. R. Repetto and R. Easton, “Climate Change and Damage From Extreme Weather Events,” Environment 52 (2012): 2, 22–33. 37. H. Kunreuther E. Michel-Kerjan, and N. Ranger, “Insuring Against Future Climate Catastrophes,” Climatic Change 18 (2013): 2, 339–354. 38. National Research Council. (2012). Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 39. S.L. Cutter, J.A. Ahearn, B. Amadei, P. Crawford, E.A. Eide, G.E. Galloway, M.F. Goodchild et al. “Disaster resilience: A national imperative,” Environment, 55(2013): 2, 25–29. 40. E. Michel-Kerjan, “How Resilient is Your Country?” Nature (2012): 491, 497. November 22. 41. E. Michel-Kerjan and H. Kunreuther, “Paying for Future Catastrophes,” The New York Times Sunday Review, November 27, 2012." @default.
• W2039117274 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2039117274 creator A5047998237 @default.
• W2039117274 creator A5065181492 @default.
• W2039117274 creator A5072048687 @default.
• W2039117274 date "2013-07-01" @default.
• W2039117274 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2039117274 title "Making America More Resilient toward Natural Disasters: A Call for Action" @default.
• W2039117274 cites W1484031021 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W1604526811 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W1977114769 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W1980098587 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W1998702201 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2001783442 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2062515660 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2077801393 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2094104200 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2106946378 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2118052532 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2128385391 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2132231745 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2147268476 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2206237662 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2292891047 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2318476657 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2752099845 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2985460341 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W3121229766 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W3124896223 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W3125898056 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W585859973 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W629899557 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2189514698 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2242785562 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W2619586453 @default.
• W2039117274 cites W3150197019 @default.
• W2039117274 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2013.803884" @default.
• W2039117274 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2039117274 type Work @default.
• W2039117274 sameAs 2039117274 @default.
• W2039117274 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742013 @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742014 @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742015 @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742016 @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742017 @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742018 @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742020 @default.
• W2039117274 countsByYear W20391172742022 @default.
• W2039117274 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2039117274 hasAuthorship W2039117274A5047998237 @default.
• W2039117274 hasAuthorship W2039117274A5065181492 @default.
• W2039117274 hasAuthorship W2039117274A5072048687 @default.
• W2039117274 hasBestOaLocation W20391172742 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C105152847 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C166566181 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C2776608160 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C2779585090 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C105152847 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C107826830 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C121332964 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C144133560 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C153294291 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C162853370 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C166566181 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C166957645 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C205649164 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C2776608160 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C2779585090 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C2780791683 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C39432304 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C62520636 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C91375879 @default.
• W2039117274 hasConceptScore W2039117274C97355855 @default.
• W2039117274 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2039117274 hasLocation W20391172741 @default.
• W2039117274 hasLocation W20391172742 @default.
• W2039117274 hasOpenAccess W2039117274 @default.
• W2039117274 hasPrimaryLocation W20391172741 @default.
• W2039117274 hasRelatedWork W2039117274 @default.
• W2039117274 hasRelatedWork W2367331993 @default.
• W2039117274 hasRelatedWork W2387944524 @default.
• W2039117274 hasRelatedWork W2418116445 @default.
• W2039117274 hasRelatedWork W2538910729 @default.
• W2039117274 hasRelatedWork W3125158318 @default.
• W2039117274 hasRelatedWork W3175966613 @default.

• next