FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2039872280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2039872280 endingPage "406" @default.
• W2039872280 startingPage "404" @default.
• W2039872280 abstract "Abstract Reference: Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Campbell S, et al. Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(2):80–92. Clinical Question: The systematic review focused on various index tests for the shoulder. We concentrated on the subscapularis tendon results to determine the accuracy of reported index tests for clinically diagnosing subscapularis integrity. Data Sources: Studies were identified by an OVID search using MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and CINHAL databases (1966–2006) and a hand search by 2 authors (E.J.H. and S.C.). Primary search terms were shoulder, examination, and diagnosis. In addition to the database searches, personal files were hand searched by one of the authors (E.J.H.) for publications, posters, and abstracts. The reference lists in review articles were cross-checked, and all individual names of each special test were queried using MEDLINE and PubMed. Study Selection: The search was limited to English-language journals. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the criterion standard was surgery, magnetic resonance imaging, or injection (subacromial or acromioclavicular joint); at least 1 physical examination test or special test was studied; and one of the paired statistics of sensitivity and specificity was reported or could be determined. Excluded were studies in which the index test was performed under anesthesia or in cadavers, studies in which the index test was assigned the status of composite physical examination, and review articles. Studies were grouped according to the subscapularis index test assessed: lift off, internal-rotation lag sign, Napoleon sign, bear hug, belly off, and belly press. Data Extraction: Studies were selected in a 2-stage process. First, all abstracts and articles found through the search process were independently reviewed by 2 authors (E.J.H. and S.C.). Disagreement on inclusion of an article was resolved by consensus. Second, each selected study was assessed by each reviewer independently. A third reviewer made the final decision on any disagreements for the selected studies. The primary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The quality of a study was determined by assessing its internal and external validity. Validity was determined by the primary author (E.J.H.) using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) statement. Our work required data extraction from the original articles, which we used to generate 2 × 2 contingency tables for each index test. Pooled indices of clinical usefulness were then determined for each index test. Main Results: The specific search criteria identified 922 articles for review. Of these, 4 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for subscapularis tendon tears, resulting in the number of studies assessing each index test as follows: 4 for lift off, 2 for internal-rotation lag sign, 2 for Napoleon sign, 1 for bear hug, 1 for belly off, and 1 for belly press. Subscapularis tears were identified by the criterion standard of surgery to visually assess the torn fibers. Across all 4 studies, a total of 304 shoulders were examined, 95 of which had a subscapularis tear (45 full thickness, 50 partial thickness), and 106 were injury free. Indices of clinical usefulness for full-thickness and partial-thickness subscapularis tears are reported in Tables 1 and 2, respectively." @default.
• W2039872280 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2039872280 creator A5018358208 @default.
• W2039872280 creator A5050547655 @default.
• W2039872280 creator A5066919301 @default.
• W2039872280 date "2010-07-01" @default.
• W2039872280 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2039872280 title "Subscapularis Tendon Integrity: An Examination of Shoulder Index Tests" @default.
• W2039872280 cites W1950385717 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W1986690514 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W1990687427 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2002271670 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2004084637 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2033137938 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2052263641 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2056246111 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2079844832 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2126392003 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2152595380 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2163389848 @default.
• W2039872280 cites W2401912695 @default.
• W2039872280 doi "https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.404" @default.
• W2039872280 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2902035" @default.
• W2039872280 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20617916" @default.
• W2039872280 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2039872280 type Work @default.
• W2039872280 sameAs 2039872280 @default.
• W2039872280 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802013 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802014 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802015 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802016 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802018 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802020 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802021 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802022 @default.
• W2039872280 countsByYear W20398722802023 @default.
• W2039872280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2039872280 hasAuthorship W2039872280A5018358208 @default.
• W2039872280 hasAuthorship W2039872280A5050547655 @default.
• W2039872280 hasAuthorship W2039872280A5066919301 @default.
• W2039872280 hasBestOaLocation W20398722801 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C2780094635 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C141071460 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C151730666 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C17744445 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C1862650 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C19527891 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C199539241 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C2777267654 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C2779473830 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C2780094635 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C527108885 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C71924100 @default.
• W2039872280 hasConceptScore W2039872280C86803240 @default.
• W2039872280 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2039872280 hasLocation W20398722801 @default.
• W2039872280 hasLocation W20398722802 @default.
• W2039872280 hasLocation W20398722803 @default.
• W2039872280 hasOpenAccess W2039872280 @default.
• W2039872280 hasPrimaryLocation W20398722801 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2089201504 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2039872280 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2039872280 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W2039872280 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2039872280 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2039872280 magId "2039872280" @default.
• W2039872280 workType "article" @default.