Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040021697> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2040021697 abstract "Since 2007, the Australian Know your numbers (KYN) program has been used in community settings to raise awareness about blood pressure and stroke. In 2011, the program was modified to include assessment for type 2 diabetes risk. However, it is unclear which approach for assessing diabetes risk in pharmacies is best. We compared two methods: random (non-fasting) blood glucose testing (RBGT); and the Australian type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool (AUSDRISK); according to 1) identification of ‘high risk’ participants including head-to-head sensitivity and specificity; 2) number of referrals to doctors; and 3) feasibility of implementation. 117 Queensland pharmacies voluntarily participated and were randomly allocated to RBGT and AUSDRISK or AUSDRISK only. Although discouraged, pharmacies were able to change allocated group prior to commencement. AUSDRISK is a validated self-administered questionnaire used to calculate a score that determines the 5-year risk of developing type 2 diabetes. AUSDRISK (score 12+) or RBGT (≥5.6 mmol/I) indicates a high potential risk of diabetes. Median linear regression was used to compare the two measures. Staff from 68 pharmacies also participated in a semi-structured interview during a site visit to provide feedback. Data were submitted for 5,483 KYN participants (60% female, 66% aged >55 years, 10% history of diabetes). Approximately half of the participants without existing diabetes were identified as ‘high risk’ based on either RBGT or AUSDRISK score. Among participants who undertook both measures, 32% recorded a high RBGT and high AUSDRISK. There was a significant association between RBGT and AUSDRISK scores. For every one point increase in AUSDRISK score there was a half point increase in RBGT levels (coefficient 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.83). Pharmacy staff reported that AUSDRISK was a simple, low cost and efficient method of assessing diabetes risk compared with RBGT, e.g. since management of sharps is not an issue. In a large, community-based sample of Australians about half of the participants without diabetes were at ‘high risk ‘of developing diabetes based on either AUSDRISK or RBGT results. AUSDRISK was considered to be an acceptable method for assessing the risk of diabetes using opportunistic health checks in community pharmacies." @default.
- W2040021697 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2040021697 creator A5001419641 @default.
- W2040021697 creator A5011243544 @default.
- W2040021697 creator A5024277814 @default.
- W2040021697 creator A5028372253 @default.
- W2040021697 creator A5045118853 @default.
- W2040021697 creator A5080414613 @default.
- W2040021697 creator A5083101662 @default.
- W2040021697 date "2014-11-27" @default.
- W2040021697 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2040021697 title "Comparison of two methods for assessing diabetes risk in a pharmacy setting in Australia" @default.
- W2040021697 cites W1507738361 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W1947569095 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W1964593899 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W1971484032 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2011832733 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2014243978 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2018361245 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2021362210 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2033976981 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2036669627 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2057019240 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2103921658 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2113536175 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2117454114 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2132971248 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2133091284 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2134925138 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2146183489 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2154430777 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2157502631 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2283181961 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W2340616286 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W4237870467 @default.
- W2040021697 cites W8521742 @default.
- W2040021697 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1227" @default.
- W2040021697 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4289299" @default.
- W2040021697 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25427845" @default.
- W2040021697 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2040021697 type Work @default.
- W2040021697 sameAs 2040021697 @default.
- W2040021697 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W2040021697 countsByYear W20400216972017 @default.
- W2040021697 countsByYear W20400216972018 @default.
- W2040021697 countsByYear W20400216972020 @default.
- W2040021697 countsByYear W20400216972021 @default.
- W2040021697 countsByYear W20400216972022 @default.
- W2040021697 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2040021697 hasAuthorship W2040021697A5001419641 @default.
- W2040021697 hasAuthorship W2040021697A5011243544 @default.
- W2040021697 hasAuthorship W2040021697A5024277814 @default.
- W2040021697 hasAuthorship W2040021697A5028372253 @default.
- W2040021697 hasAuthorship W2040021697A5045118853 @default.
- W2040021697 hasAuthorship W2040021697A5080414613 @default.
- W2040021697 hasAuthorship W2040021697A5083101662 @default.
- W2040021697 hasBestOaLocation W20400216971 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C107130276 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C140556311 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C2777180221 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C104863432 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C107130276 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C12174686 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C126322002 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C134018914 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C140556311 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C2777180221 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C38652104 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C41008148 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C512399662 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C555293320 @default.
- W2040021697 hasConceptScore W2040021697C71924100 @default.
- W2040021697 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2040021697 hasLocation W20400216971 @default.
- W2040021697 hasLocation W20400216972 @default.
- W2040021697 hasLocation W20400216973 @default.
- W2040021697 hasLocation W20400216974 @default.
- W2040021697 hasLocation W20400216975 @default.
- W2040021697 hasOpenAccess W2040021697 @default.
- W2040021697 hasPrimaryLocation W20400216971 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W1563850031 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2006248328 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2060454288 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2091358210 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2124616339 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2233866314 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2320601639 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2383009242 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W2415759662 @default.
- W2040021697 hasRelatedWork W3036934084 @default.
- W2040021697 hasVolume "14" @default.