FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040092868> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040092868 endingPage "595" @default.
• W2040092868 startingPage "580" @default.
• W2040092868 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the suitability of various methods for the reduction of a large finite element model (FEM) of satellites to produce models to be used for correlation of the FEM with test results. The robustness of the cross‐orthogonality checks (COC) for the correlation process carried out utilizing the reduced model is investigated, showing its dependence on the number of mode shapes used in the reduction process. Finally the paper investigates the improvement in the robustness of the COC that can be achieved utilizing optimality criteria for the selection of the degrees of freedom (DOF) used for the correlation process. Design/methodology/approach A Monte Carlo approach has been used to simulate inaccuracies in the mode shapes (analysis and experimental) of a satellite FEM that are compared during the COC. The sensitivity of the COC to the parameters utilized during the reduction process, i.e. mode shapes and DOFs, is then assessed for different levels of inaccuracy in the mode shapes. Findings The System Equivalent Expansion Reduction Process (SEREP) has been identified as a particularly suitable method, with the advantage that a SEREP reduced model has the same eigenvalues and eigenvector of the whole system therefore automatically meeting the criteria on the quality of the reduced model. The inclusion of a high number of mode shapes in the reduction process makes the check very sensitive to minor experimental or modelling inaccuracies. Finally it was shown that utilizing optimality criteria in the selection of the DOFs to carry out the correlation can significantly improve the probability of meeting the COC criteria. Research limitations/implications This work is based on the FEM of the satellite Aeolus , and therefore the numerical values obtained in this study are specific for this application. However, this model represents a typical satellite FEM and therefore the trends identified in this work are expected to be generally valid for this type of structure. Practical implications The correlation of satellite FEM with test results involves a substantial effort, and it is crucial to avoid failures of the COC due to numerical issues rather than real model inaccuracies. This work shows also how an inappropriate choice of reduction parameters can lead to failure of the COC in cases when there are only very minor differences (e.g. due to minor amount of noise in the results) between analytical and test results. Vice versa, the work also shows how the robustness of the reduced model can be improved. Originality/value The paper shows how the robustness of the correlation process for a satellite FEM carried out utilising a SEREP reduced model needed to be investigated, to demonstrate the suitability of this method to reduce large FEM of satellites." @default.
• W2040092868 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040092868 creator A5056059769 @default.
• W2040092868 creator A5065408717 @default.
• W2040092868 creator A5082093090 @default.
• W2040092868 date "2012-08-17" @default.
• W2040092868 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2040092868 title "On the use of SEREP for satellite FEM validation" @default.
• W2040092868 cites W1518683384 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W1998564954 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2016467472 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2029764367 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2058012107 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2063065475 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2113237381 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2118357359 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2148618957 @default.
• W2040092868 cites W2480262940 @default.
• W2040092868 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401211246292" @default.
• W2040092868 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2040092868 type Work @default.
• W2040092868 sameAs 2040092868 @default.
• W2040092868 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682014 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682015 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682016 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682017 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682018 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682019 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682020 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682021 @default.
• W2040092868 countsByYear W20400928682023 @default.
• W2040092868 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040092868 hasAuthorship W2040092868A5056059769 @default.
• W2040092868 hasAuthorship W2040092868A5065408717 @default.
• W2040092868 hasAuthorship W2040092868A5082093090 @default.
• W2040092868 hasBestOaLocation W20400928682 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C135628077 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C158693339 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C17137986 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C208081375 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C21200559 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C24326235 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C47446073 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C63479239 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C104317684 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C105795698 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C111335779 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C111919701 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C11413529 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C121332964 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C127413603 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C135628077 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C154945302 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C158693339 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C17137986 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C185592680 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C19499675 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C208081375 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C21200559 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C24326235 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C2524010 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C2775924081 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C33923547 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C41008148 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C47446073 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C55493867 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C62520636 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C63479239 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C66938386 @default.
• W2040092868 hasConceptScore W2040092868C98045186 @default.
• W2040092868 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2040092868 hasLocation W20400928681 @default.
• W2040092868 hasLocation W20400928682 @default.
• W2040092868 hasOpenAccess W2040092868 @default.
• W2040092868 hasPrimaryLocation W20400928681 @default.
• W2040092868 hasRelatedWork W101223282 @default.
• W2040092868 hasRelatedWork W1475114119 @default.
• W2040092868 hasRelatedWork W1985882228 @default.
• W2040092868 hasRelatedWork W1997238880 @default.

• next