FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040159905> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040159905 abstract "ABSTRACT References and figures at end of paper. It appears that, short of superconductivity, digital engineers are very close to the ultimate computational speeds that are possible with single processors. All new supercomputers have resorted, each to a different degree, to breaking up the computational sequence into parallel components. Parallel processing, therefore, appears likely to be with us for some time. The purpose of this paper is to show how recent progress in numerical analysis has made processing seismic data on a Massively-Parallel Computer (MPC) possible. Seismic computing's natural divisibility into small pieces and its localized communication pattern give strong impetus toward performing it on massively-parallel SIMD computer architecture. It is true that we will have to modify or scrap some of our traditional algorithms in favor of new ones in order to reap the full benefit of the parallel computer but this is already happening in some laboratories. The net result of this research will be dramatic speedups and consequent cost reduction in our processing centers. It appears that, short of superconductivity, digital engineers are very close to the ultimate computational speeds that are possible with single processors. Vector computers, whose architecture is based on pipelining, proved to be only an interim solution. They were, in fact, just a more efficient utilization of a single processor. All new supercomputers have resorted, each to a different degree, to breaking up the computational sequence into parallel components. This runs the spectrum from a few processors as in the CRAY Y-MP series, through hundreds of processors in the NCUBE machine to thousands in the Thinking Machines Corp. (TMC) CM2 machine. Parallel processing, therefore, appears likely to be with us for sometime. The common parallel architecture machines fall into three major categories: Tightly-Coupled (e.g., CRAY), Multiple Instl1lction Multiple Data (e.g., NCUBE), and Single Instruction Multiple Data (e.g., TMC). The historical progression of supercomputer development has been in this order. In other words, practical Tightly-Coupled machines came into use first followed by MIMD and lastly by SIMD. There is a growing body of lore in the seismic data processing industry as to the relative benefits of these different architectures. Selection criteria include speed, ease of coding, and, of course, cost. There is a fourth, somewhat amorphous criterion: applicability. Some algorithms are naturals for certain computer architectures and contrary wise. Because parallel supercomputer architectures evolve, the algorithms that run on them must also evolve. In fact, the numerical mathematical literature is filled with new algorithms for new architectures. The purpose of this paper is to show how recent progress in numerical analysis has made processing seismic data on a Massively-Parallel Computer (MPC) possible. 11le TMC model CM2 connection Machine is an example of a MPC with 64K possible processors. Based on SIMD architecture, its processors either execute the same instruction or remain idle." @default.
• W2040159905 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040159905 creator A5012372190 @default.
• W2040159905 date "1992-05-04" @default.
• W2040159905 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2040159905 title "Finite Difference Seismic Modeling on the Connection Machine" @default.
• W2040159905 doi "https://doi.org/10.4043/6828-ms" @default.
• W2040159905 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W2040159905 type Work @default.
• W2040159905 sameAs 2040159905 @default.
• W2040159905 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2040159905 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2040159905 hasAuthorship W2040159905A5012372190 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConcept C13355873 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConceptScore W2040159905C127313418 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConceptScore W2040159905C13355873 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConceptScore W2040159905C2524010 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConceptScore W2040159905C33923547 @default.
• W2040159905 hasConceptScore W2040159905C41008148 @default.
• W2040159905 hasLocation W20401599051 @default.
• W2040159905 hasOpenAccess W2040159905 @default.
• W2040159905 hasPrimaryLocation W20401599051 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W1989711412 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2078418917 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2148476475 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2320486975 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2323432797 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2357636395 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2363355514 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2366823545 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2368306704 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2377057531 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2386567268 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2390216159 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2580960965 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2618037844 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2792556602 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W3000535989 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W3210287578 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W94937583 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2880974805 @default.
• W2040159905 hasRelatedWork W2916055357 @default.
• W2040159905 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2040159905 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2040159905 magId "2040159905" @default.
• W2040159905 workType "article" @default.