FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040221315> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040221315 endingPage "928" @default.
• W2040221315 startingPage "922" @default.
• W2040221315 abstract "BackgroundMesenteric bypass grafts may be followed postoperatively with duplex scanning. It is unknown, however, if duplex-derived velocity measurements vary over time or if the type of procedure (antegrade vs retrograde) and the caliber of graft affect velocity measurements. The purpose of this study was to characterize duplex findings in mesenteric bypass grafts with respect to the type of revascularization, graft caliber, and changes over time. This study also sought to identify duplex characteristics that could predict subsequent graft failure.MethodsDuplex examinations of mesenteric bypass grafts were reviewed. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) from the inflow artery, proximal anastomosis, mid graft, distal anastomosis, and outflow arteries were analyzed with respect to timing of the examination (index study vs follow-up exam), inflow source, distal target, and graft diameter. The results were compared with analysis of variance (P < .05). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine any association with mid-graft PSV.ResultsFasting postoperative duplex scans were reviewed from 43 mesenteric bypass grafts in 38 patients (28 superior mesenteric artery [SMA] alone, 3 celiac alone, 5 celiac and SMA, 2 SMA and renal). A total of 167 duplex exams were analyzed (mean of 4.5 studies per patient; range, 1 to 14). Inflow artery velocities were significantly lower in antegrade vs retrograde configurations (93 ± 73 cm/s vs 154 ± 73 cm/s, P < .05); however, proximal and mid-graft PSVs were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, no effect was noted on mid-graft PSV when distal targets were compared (SMA vs celiac, 149 ± 42 cm/s vs 160 ± 78 cm/s, P = NS). An association between smaller graft diameter and higher mid-graft PSV was seen with univariate analysis (P = .03), with a trend toward significance with multivariate analysis (P = .06). In 18 bypass grafts where a follow-up examination was available >1 year (mean 38 ± 25 months) after the index postoperative exam, velocity did not significantly change over time. No duplex scan characteristics were predictive of graft thrombosis.ConclusionThis is the first study, to our knowledge, to fully characterize duplex-derived flow velocities in mesenteric artery bypass grafts. Although surveillance duplex scans after mesenteric bypass procedures may be affected by graft diameter, they are not significantly affected by the choice of inflow artery. These data can serve as standards for postoperative surveillance of mesenteric bypass grafts. Mesenteric bypass grafts may be followed postoperatively with duplex scanning. It is unknown, however, if duplex-derived velocity measurements vary over time or if the type of procedure (antegrade vs retrograde) and the caliber of graft affect velocity measurements. The purpose of this study was to characterize duplex findings in mesenteric bypass grafts with respect to the type of revascularization, graft caliber, and changes over time. This study also sought to identify duplex characteristics that could predict subsequent graft failure. Duplex examinations of mesenteric bypass grafts were reviewed. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) from the inflow artery, proximal anastomosis, mid graft, distal anastomosis, and outflow arteries were analyzed with respect to timing of the examination (index study vs follow-up exam), inflow source, distal target, and graft diameter. The results were compared with analysis of variance (P < .05). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine any association with mid-graft PSV. Fasting postoperative duplex scans were reviewed from 43 mesenteric bypass grafts in 38 patients (28 superior mesenteric artery [SMA] alone, 3 celiac alone, 5 celiac and SMA, 2 SMA and renal). A total of 167 duplex exams were analyzed (mean of 4.5 studies per patient; range, 1 to 14). Inflow artery velocities were significantly lower in antegrade vs retrograde configurations (93 ± 73 cm/s vs 154 ± 73 cm/s, P < .05); however, proximal and mid-graft PSVs were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, no effect was noted on mid-graft PSV when distal targets were compared (SMA vs celiac, 149 ± 42 cm/s vs 160 ± 78 cm/s, P = NS). An association between smaller graft diameter and higher mid-graft PSV was seen with univariate analysis (P = .03), with a trend toward significance with multivariate analysis (P = .06). In 18 bypass grafts where a follow-up examination was available >1 year (mean 38 ± 25 months) after the index postoperative exam, velocity did not significantly change over time. No duplex scan characteristics were predictive of graft thrombosis. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to fully characterize duplex-derived flow velocities in mesenteric artery bypass grafts. Although surveillance duplex scans after mesenteric bypass procedures may be affected by graft diameter, they are not significantly affected by the choice of inflow artery. These data can serve as standards for postoperative surveillance of mesenteric bypass grafts." @default.
• W2040221315 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040221315 creator A5003579169 @default.
• W2040221315 creator A5003799076 @default.
• W2040221315 creator A5023040340 @default.
• W2040221315 creator A5047034100 @default.
• W2040221315 creator A5069476903 @default.
• W2040221315 creator A5076128617 @default.
• W2040221315 date "2007-05-01" @default.
• W2040221315 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2040221315 title "Duplex scan characteristics of bypass grafts to mesenteric arteries" @default.
• W2040221315 cites W1501590777 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W1973225862 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W1983130207 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2003676665 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2026670567 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2032949453 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2041580444 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2043517681 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2046797198 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2061923595 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2073024627 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2092541512 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2133163524 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2136059050 @default.
• W2040221315 cites W2156051724 @default.
• W2040221315 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.020" @default.
• W2040221315 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17391903" @default.
• W2040221315 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2040221315 type Work @default.
• W2040221315 sameAs 2040221315 @default.
• W2040221315 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152012 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152013 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152014 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152015 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152016 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152017 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152018 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152021 @default.
• W2040221315 countsByYear W20402213152022 @default.
• W2040221315 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040221315 hasAuthorship W2040221315A5003579169 @default.
• W2040221315 hasAuthorship W2040221315A5003799076 @default.
• W2040221315 hasAuthorship W2040221315A5023040340 @default.
• W2040221315 hasAuthorship W2040221315A5047034100 @default.
• W2040221315 hasAuthorship W2040221315A5069476903 @default.
• W2040221315 hasAuthorship W2040221315A5076128617 @default.
• W2040221315 hasBestOaLocation W20402213151 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C144301174 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C161921814 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2776926547 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2780771799 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2781038377 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2781046184 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C2781150406 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConcept C99611785 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C114614502 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C126322002 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C126838900 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C141071460 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C144301174 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C161921814 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C164705383 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2776820930 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2776926547 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2779464278 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2780007028 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2780771799 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2781038377 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2781046184 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C2781150406 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C33923547 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C38180746 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C500558357 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C54355233 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C552990157 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C71924100 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C8443397 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C86803240 @default.
• W2040221315 hasConceptScore W2040221315C99611785 @default.
• W2040221315 hasIssue "5" @default.

• next