Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040253539> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 98 of
98
with 100 items per page.
- W2040253539 endingPage "1190" @default.
- W2040253539 startingPage "1186" @default.
- W2040253539 abstract "In contrast to the recommendations of the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, neonatal hearing screening programs are still not universally available, and many countries implement elective screening in high-risk newborns.To assess the failure rates of neonates in hearing screening and the relative importance of risk factors for hearing impairment, both in neonatal intensive care units and in well-baby nursery neonates. The impact on cost-effectiveness is also evaluated.In the current study, 25,288 newborns were assessed; 23,574 were full-term newborns in the well-baby nursery and 1,714 neonates were in neonatal intensive care units.All neonates had a general examination (including assessment for congenital anomalies and related history) and were assessed using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. All newborns were older than 36 weeks at examination and thus had reliable transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.From the 23,574 full-term neonates in the well-baby nursery, 23,123 (98.1%) passed the test and 451 failed (1.9%). Fifty-three of the 23,574 neonates (0.2%) had a risk factor for hearing impairment; 44 (83%) passed the test and 9 failed (17%). Family history of congenital hearing loss and congenital anomalies were the most frequent risk factors for hearing loss. From the 1,714 neonates in neonatal intensive care units, 1,590 (93%) passed the test and 124 failed (7%). Two hundred thirty-two of the 1,714 neonates (14%) had a risk factor for hearing impairment; 205 (88%) passed the test and 27 failed (12%). In neonatal intensive care unit neonates, toxic levels of ototoxic drugs, mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours, prematurity, and low birth weight were the most frequent risk factors for hearing loss. Congenital anomalies/syndromes were the most important risk factors for failing screening in both the neonatal intensive care unit and the well-baby nursery, as they showed the highest risk of failing hearing screening. The second most important factor in neonatal intensive care unit newborns was low birth weight, and the third was prematurity in relation to the possibility of failing hearing screening.The present study found 575 neonates failing hearing screening of 25,288 tested newborns (2.3%). The fact that 78% of newborns who failed hearing screening were in the well-baby nurseries further supports the necessity of universal hearing screening instead of selective screening in neonatal intensive care units, even with the obvious impact on cost-effectiveness. Even if limited funding lead to selective screening in neonatal intensive care units, this should not be applied to high-risk newborns but to all neonatal intensive care unit neonates. Continuous assessment of risk factors and the related possibility of failing hearing screening are of paramount importance in designing hearing screening programs and refining the respective criteria." @default.
- W2040253539 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2040253539 creator A5037271320 @default.
- W2040253539 creator A5039923324 @default.
- W2040253539 creator A5070580953 @default.
- W2040253539 creator A5073588291 @default.
- W2040253539 creator A5075390255 @default.
- W2040253539 creator A5077184472 @default.
- W2040253539 creator A5083254417 @default.
- W2040253539 date "2005-11-01" @default.
- W2040253539 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2040253539 title "Newborn Hearing Screening: Effectiveness, Importance of High-Risk Factors, and Characteristics of Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Well-Baby Nursery" @default.
- W2040253539 cites W1971872171 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W1973576404 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W1975793536 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W1976582489 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W1983585638 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W1997143743 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2022361170 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2033636956 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2035540464 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2042925164 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2055240976 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2063431138 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2068425606 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2073879332 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2084189677 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2088245887 @default.
- W2040253539 cites W2135117966 @default.
- W2040253539 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000184602.94677.41" @default.
- W2040253539 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16272939" @default.
- W2040253539 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2040253539 type Work @default.
- W2040253539 sameAs 2040253539 @default.
- W2040253539 citedByCount "72" @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392012 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392013 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392014 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392015 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392016 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392017 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392018 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392020 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392021 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392022 @default.
- W2040253539 countsByYear W20402535392023 @default.
- W2040253539 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2040253539 hasAuthorship W2040253539A5037271320 @default.
- W2040253539 hasAuthorship W2040253539A5039923324 @default.
- W2040253539 hasAuthorship W2040253539A5070580953 @default.
- W2040253539 hasAuthorship W2040253539A5073588291 @default.
- W2040253539 hasAuthorship W2040253539A5075390255 @default.
- W2040253539 hasAuthorship W2040253539A5077184472 @default.
- W2040253539 hasAuthorship W2040253539A5083254417 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C2777091541 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C2780607864 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C2781371907 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C50440223 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C126322002 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C177713679 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C187212893 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C2777091541 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C2780493683 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C2780607864 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C2781371907 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C2987404301 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C50440223 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C548259974 @default.
- W2040253539 hasConceptScore W2040253539C71924100 @default.
- W2040253539 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2040253539 hasLocation W20402535391 @default.
- W2040253539 hasLocation W20402535392 @default.
- W2040253539 hasOpenAccess W2040253539 @default.
- W2040253539 hasPrimaryLocation W20402535391 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W2021276675 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W2035368809 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W2040253539 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W2047985469 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W2096108196 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W2409361954 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W2417619967 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W3097391200 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W3097684933 @default.
- W2040253539 hasRelatedWork W3202490215 @default.
- W2040253539 hasVolume "26" @default.
- W2040253539 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2040253539 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2040253539 magId "2040253539" @default.
- W2040253539 workType "article" @default.