Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040306670> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2040306670 endingPage "564" @default.
- W2040306670 startingPage "533" @default.
- W2040306670 abstract "Puritanism and the Power of Sympathy Abram van Engen (bio) When John Winthrop envisioned his ideal community in A Model of Christian Charity, he proclaimed that a “sensibleness and sympathy of each other’s conditions will necessarily infuse into each parte a native desire and endeavour, to strengthen, defend, preserve and comfort the other” (Winthrop Papers [WP] 2: 289). This hope of sympathy forms the heart of Winthrop’s “model”—a vision of society in which reciprocal affections become fundamental to communal well-being. Such a view drew on a long tradition of Puritan sentiment.1 Since the late sixteenth century, Puritans defined and employed sympathy in a variety of writings, explicating it from biblical passages and enjoining it on followers as necessary to the godly life. The concept of fellow feeling, I argue in this essay, pervaded New England Puritanism and affected the shape of its literature. In particular, the texts examined here demonstrate that a language of sympathy helped Puritans negotiate the vexed political and theological relationship between New England and Old. When Puritans spoke of sympathy, they relied on a term with wide usage in the seventeenth century.2 Transliterated from the Greek συμπαθεία, the English word “sympathy” emerged around the same time as did Puritanism in the late 1500s. Initially applied to nature and the anatomy, the term primarily signified organic connections, the attraction of like things unto like things (such as iron and a loadstone). Yet as Puritans adopted the word, it became increasingly linked to the affections—and particularly to communal affections, those passions that bound together political and religious bodies. In the first English dictionary, written in 1604 to help readers understand the “hard usuall” words of sermons, the Puritan Robert Cawdrey defined sympathy as “fellowelike feeling” (145). Such fellow feeling operated by imagining oneself in the place of another. Parsing the Golden Rule (“Doe as thou wouldest be done by”), the English Puritan minister Robert Bolton advised saints, “In a fellow-feeling reall conceit, put thy selfe into the place, and impartially put on the person of the party [End Page 533] with whom thou art to deale” before “returning to thy selfe,” only then dealing out what “thou wouldest be willing . . . to receive . . . if thou wert in his case” (207–08).3 Puritans, moreover, considered sympathy both a doctrine and a duty. Commenting on 1 Peter 3.8, the theologian Nicholas Byfield proclaimed, “The doctrine then is cleer, That we ought to have a sympathie one towards another” (187). Through sympathy, through this “fellowelike-feeling,” saints would be prompted to godly action. Thus, the minister Thomas Draxe, having asked what duties one must perform “to persons afflicted and persecuted,” answered, “First, wee must have a fellowlike feeling of their misery, and sympathize with them” (2: 125). After sympathizing (and as a result of it), Christians should pray, offer counsel and “minister unto their necessities” (2: 126). In other words, deeds followed from feeling. Before people acted well, they had to be moved.4 Such a view meshed well with an Augustinian humanism embraced more broadly in early modern England. As explained by William Bouwsma, Augustinian humanism considered the will to “take its direction not from reason but from the affections, which are in turn not merely the disorderly impulses of the treacherous body but expressions of the energy and quality of the heart” (47). Bouwsma thus contrasts Augustinian humanism with Stoicism, claiming that the latter never squelched the former during the early modern period. Indeed, a wealth of recent scholarship has focused new attention on what Richard Strier calls the early modern “praise of passion”—a praise he attributes to the Reformation tradition and traces out in English literature. As Strier explains, for many, such as Salutati, Luther and Calvin, Christ’s emotional example (weeping for misfortunes) serves as an example for true Christians (31–32).5 But the importance of passion extended beyond Reformed thinkers: for Thomas Wright, a Roman Catholic priest who published The Passions of the Mind in 1600, passion enabled virtuous action. As John Staines summarizes, “A passion is to be moved in order to move a person to act virtuously: the passive emotion becomes active, spurring on..." @default.
- W2040306670 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2040306670 creator A5054829912 @default.
- W2040306670 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W2040306670 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2040306670 title "Puritanism and the Power of Sympathy" @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1266120497 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1483543676 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1485997202 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1491598691 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1514832240 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1529256722 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1553415249 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1553523555 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1573046830 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1966893316 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1973129809 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1977639099 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1977664341 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1981164882 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1989988248 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1989998792 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W1996997854 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2001635978 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2010518664 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2018085471 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2018633283 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2020392901 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2020521540 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2025257926 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2026778528 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2027501347 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2045110631 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2051451044 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2063502785 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2083191366 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2086593433 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2087976587 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2090047725 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2090304981 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2120558023 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2320036600 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2320947314 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2323471411 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2326606428 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2728263760 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W2802323551 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W3147885067 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W3152297414 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W569046011 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W582945550 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W590214216 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W598130012 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W598755078 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W609728867 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W612669211 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W652157975 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W652582283 @default.
- W2040306670 cites W652906535 @default.
- W2040306670 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2010.0040" @default.
- W2040306670 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2040306670 type Work @default.
- W2040306670 sameAs 2040306670 @default.
- W2040306670 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W2040306670 countsByYear W20403066702012 @default.
- W2040306670 countsByYear W20403066702014 @default.
- W2040306670 countsByYear W20403066702016 @default.
- W2040306670 countsByYear W20403066702017 @default.
- W2040306670 countsByYear W20403066702021 @default.
- W2040306670 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2040306670 hasAuthorship W2040306670A5054829912 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C2779115301 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C107038049 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C111472728 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C121332964 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C122980154 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C124952713 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C136197465 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C138885662 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C142362112 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C144024400 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C154945302 @default.
- W2040306670 hasConceptScore W2040306670C15744967 @default.