FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040445789> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040445789 endingPage "140" @default.
• W2040445789 startingPage "128" @default.
• W2040445789 abstract "Ethics, Stories and Reading Colin Davis (bio) Can the reality of complex moral situations be represented by means other than those of imaginative literature? — Williams, Morality xix If we could readily agree with Martha Nussbaum that certain novels are, irreplaceably, works of moral philosophy (148), then we might already have an answer to the question of whether or not literature matters. It would matter to us to the exact extent that it might help to make our lives richer, better and fuller. Nussbaum, though, refers only to certain novels and not to literature in general. She readily admits that not all novels will suit her interests (45). For every novel that is a major work of moral philosophy, there may be more that are morally indifferent or even reprehensible and damaging. The works that matter to us may be merely the ones that support - or at best help us to formulate - our existing views about life and morality. So perhaps literature does not really matter after all, if we attend to it only insofar as it confirms what we already believe. I would risk the suggestion that, more often than not, ethical criticism has proved to be ethically unchallenging. This article does not propose a historical or theoretical account of ethical criticism, nor does it contribute to the discussion of when and whether the ethical turn in literary studies took place. Important work on these questions has already been done, not least in a recent edition of SubStance.1 Rather, I want to look at three cases where stories inform or obstruct ethical reflection. The first two are short, invented narratives discussed by the moral philosophers Immanuel Kant and Bernard Williams respectively. Nussbaum suggests that when philosophers use examples the result is cooked because what is ethically salient is already underscored (47).2 But the example may also be unruly, as the title of an important book on the subject puts it (see Gelley, ed., Unruly Examples). Rather than illustrating a particular point of view, examples may, in Alexander Gelley's words, come to serve not as a confirmation of a rule but as an instrument of testing, of possible revision (12). They may strain a philosophical argument to the point of making it untenable. The philosophers' use of stories also raises the question of how readers collaborate in the construction of a text's meaning. Kant takes an example that was [End Page 128] designed to prove a particular point, and tries to make it demonstrate a quite different one. Williams, by contrast, does not try to force a moral conclusion from his example. Instead, he wants to instruct us about which factors should carry weight in an ethical deliberation. He is more content than Kant to let the story itself remain inconclusive. The third case I shall examine is Albert Camus's short story L'Hôte (The Guest), a work that stubbornly resists any expectation on the reader's part that it might provide explanations and solutions. It poses problems for understanding Camus's late ethics in particular and the ethics of literature in general. Kant and the Philanthropic Lie The first case comes from Kant's essay On a Supposed Right to Lie because of Philanthropic Concerns, first published in 1797. This is a response to an article by Benjamin Constant that argued against Kant's ethical rigorism. Without directly naming Kant, Constant refers to a German philosopher [who] goes as far as to assert that it would be a crime to tell a lie to a murderer who asked whether our friend who is being pursued by the murderer had taken refuge in our house (63). Constant agrees with Kant that it is a duty to tell the truth, but disagrees that this is always the case: To tell the truth is thus a duty, but is a duty only with regard to one who has a right to the truth. But no one has a right to a truth that harms others (64). The murderer has forfeited the right to the truth, so it is justifiable to lie to him. Moreover, telling a lie is a small moral compromise if it results in a..." @default.
• W2040445789 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040445789 creator A5063657248 @default.
• W2040445789 creator A5086446469 @default.
• W2040445789 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2040445789 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2040445789 title "Ethics, Stories and Reading" @default.
• W2040445789 cites W124739214 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1496644908 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1574532460 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1581644600 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1595353434 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W173840877 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1965806322 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1972115162 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1980969912 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1987869835 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W1993508326 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W2000996120 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W2002692232 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W2033286500 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W2054861835 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W2250197986 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W259068780 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W2795677443 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W561209772 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W596107968 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W630200568 @default.
• W2040445789 cites W645059583 @default.
• W2040445789 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2013.0023" @default.
• W2040445789 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2040445789 type Work @default.
• W2040445789 sameAs 2040445789 @default.
• W2040445789 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2040445789 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040445789 hasAuthorship W2040445789A5063657248 @default.
• W2040445789 hasAuthorship W2040445789A5086446469 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C198626708 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C200113983 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C2910408888 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C2994432249 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C35057381 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C111472728 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C138885662 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C144024400 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C17744445 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C198626708 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C199539241 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C200113983 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C2910408888 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C2994432249 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C35057381 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C554936623 @default.
• W2040445789 hasConceptScore W2040445789C7991579 @default.
• W2040445789 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2040445789 hasLocation W20404457891 @default.
• W2040445789 hasOpenAccess W2040445789 @default.
• W2040445789 hasPrimaryLocation W20404457891 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W182835640 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W2023078788 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W2152823051 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W2525018480 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W2909272973 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W3001101630 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W3115274499 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W4240230942 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W858030927 @default.
• W2040445789 hasRelatedWork W90646117 @default.
• W2040445789 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W2040445789 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2040445789 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2040445789 magId "2040445789" @default.
• W2040445789 workType "article" @default.