Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040492733> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 84 of
84
with 100 items per page.
- W2040492733 endingPage "161" @default.
- W2040492733 startingPage "157" @default.
- W2040492733 abstract "<h3>Objective</h3> The Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network is a voluntary system for submission of data to generate individual report cards and benchmarking. The aim of this study was to compare aspects of ERCP practice between USA and UK participants. <h3>Design</h3> Analysis was limited to USA and UK based endoscopists who had each entered more than 30 cases. A number of practice and performance measures were studied including, rates of deep biliary cannulation, sedation use and success in bile duct stone removal. <h3>Setting and patients</h3> Patients attending for routine and emergency ERCP in participating tertiary and secondary care units in the UK and USA. <h3>Results</h3> 61 US endoscopists performed 18 182 procedures and 16 UK endoscopists 3172, respectively. The UK participants performed less complex procedures as judged by the accepted complexity grading system, 8% versus 35% at grade 3, p<0.001. There was a significantly greater use of sedation as opposed to anaesthesia in the UK 97% versus 34%, p<0.001. UK deep biliary cannulation rate was 93% versus 97%, p<0.001. For small bile duct stones (<10 mm) the UK success rate was 96% compared with 99%, p<0.001. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The present data, while not purporting to be an accurate representation of practice in either country, documents good technical success in both cohorts, albeit significantly better in the USA. The inexorable drive to greater accountability and transparency of outcomes in endoscopic practice is likely to lead to increased participation in subsequent benchmarking projects." @default.
- W2040492733 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2040492733 creator A5008463028 @default.
- W2040492733 creator A5037724712 @default.
- W2040492733 creator A5083768374 @default.
- W2040492733 date "2012-05-01" @default.
- W2040492733 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2040492733 title "The ERCP quality network benchmarking project: a preliminary comparison of practice in UK and USA" @default.
- W2040492733 cites W1967629057 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W1969379081 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W1988034812 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W1996899571 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2027806798 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2045776656 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2052300476 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2061914238 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2078172407 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2080236384 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2107999928 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2129875497 @default.
- W2040492733 cites W2134971603 @default.
- W2040492733 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2011-100099" @default.
- W2040492733 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5517277" @default.
- W2040492733 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28839658" @default.
- W2040492733 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W2040492733 type Work @default.
- W2040492733 sameAs 2040492733 @default.
- W2040492733 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W2040492733 countsByYear W20404927332012 @default.
- W2040492733 countsByYear W20404927332017 @default.
- W2040492733 countsByYear W20404927332018 @default.
- W2040492733 countsByYear W20404927332020 @default.
- W2040492733 countsByYear W20404927332021 @default.
- W2040492733 countsByYear W20404927332022 @default.
- W2040492733 countsByYear W20404927332023 @default.
- W2040492733 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2040492733 hasAuthorship W2040492733A5008463028 @default.
- W2040492733 hasAuthorship W2040492733A5037724712 @default.
- W2040492733 hasAuthorship W2040492733A5083768374 @default.
- W2040492733 hasBestOaLocation W20404927332 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C2776814716 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C2778444009 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConcept C86251818 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C141071460 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C144133560 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C162853370 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C194828623 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C2775967933 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C2776814716 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C2778444009 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C61434518 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C71924100 @default.
- W2040492733 hasConceptScore W2040492733C86251818 @default.
- W2040492733 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2040492733 hasLocation W20404927331 @default.
- W2040492733 hasLocation W20404927332 @default.
- W2040492733 hasLocation W20404927333 @default.
- W2040492733 hasLocation W20404927334 @default.
- W2040492733 hasOpenAccess W2040492733 @default.
- W2040492733 hasPrimaryLocation W20404927331 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2334128511 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2420170407 @default.
- W2040492733 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W2040492733 hasVolume "3" @default.
- W2040492733 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2040492733 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2040492733 magId "2040492733" @default.
- W2040492733 workType "article" @default.