FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040529401> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040529401 endingPage "57" @default.
• W2040529401 startingPage "45" @default.
• W2040529401 abstract "Abstract The findings discussed here are not an exhaustive rendition of all the factors—professional, academic and ethical—surrounding the issue of excessive publication. Instead, they outline a problem of current and growing concern within the professional serials librarian community and are intended to equip serials librarians to deal more effectively with the phenomenon. The occasionally divergent characteristics of excessive publication in the sciences and the social sciences, although only briefly touched upon here, provide an initial indication of what serials librarians and subject specialists should look for in attempting to assess the quality of the journal literature in different disciplines. It may be true that some journal editors regard serials librarians as superfluous to the “gatekeeper” function—a point sadly confirmed by these findings. Such a situation indicates a clear need on the part of the serials librarian community to take a more proactive role in asserting their responsibilities in this area. Many serials librarians will complain that their libraries are a captive audience; that they have little scope to contribute to the debate on excessive publication, and even less to influence directly the quality control role of journal editors and publishers; that they are victims . Chapman and Webster typify the views of many observers when they explicitly single out journal publishers as exploiters of academic libraries: “… it is libraries, pressed by their academic colleagues, which provide the bulk of the circulation for journals and assured profit for the publisher. They are charged exorbitant rates on the grounds that they are read by many people. But can we continue in this way? Are libraries' stacks to bulge with unread journals ?. These are important questions which require longterm strategic consideration. What is clear is that the problem of excessive publication is one of many closely inter-linked issues which influence collection evaluation approaches. It is incumbent upon the academic and research library community to base collection management decisions on a thorough consideration of the qualitative aspects of collection development, through a more informed understanding of the issue of journal and article quality. The findings reported here can best be utilized as only one part of an intelligent, planned collection management process. Recommendations from academic and research staff, evidence from user studies, bibliometric analyses, and subscription costs are all important factors in assessing the value of scholarly and scientific journals—but none should be regarded in isolation." @default.
• W2040529401 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040529401 creator A5023571108 @default.
• W2040529401 date "1997-06-01" @default.
• W2040529401 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2040529401 title "‘Gatekeepers’ and the quality of the journal literature: Findings from a survey of journal editors into the issue of alleged excessive publication in scholarly and scientific journals" @default.
• W2040529401 cites W1974808943 @default.
• W2040529401 cites W2022899629 @default.
• W2040529401 cites W2023759588 @default.
• W2040529401 cites W2043609668 @default.
• W2040529401 cites W2049614693 @default.
• W2040529401 cites W2159494607 @default.
• W2040529401 cites W4248734995 @default.
• W2040529401 cites W4254961263 @default.
• W2040529401 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-7913(97)90050-2" @default.
• W2040529401 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W2040529401 type Work @default.
• W2040529401 sameAs 2040529401 @default.
• W2040529401 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2040529401 countsByYear W20405294012014 @default.
• W2040529401 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040529401 hasAuthorship W2040529401A5023571108 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConceptScore W2040529401C111472728 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConceptScore W2040529401C138885662 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConceptScore W2040529401C161191863 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConceptScore W2040529401C2779530757 @default.
• W2040529401 hasConceptScore W2040529401C41008148 @default.
• W2040529401 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2040529401 hasLocation W20405294011 @default.
• W2040529401 hasOpenAccess W2040529401 @default.
• W2040529401 hasPrimaryLocation W20405294011 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2352466142 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2362665430 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2373216116 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2375415347 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2375981319 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2384667405 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2386156173 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2386258674 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W2562923059 @default.
• W2040529401 hasRelatedWork W3123396266 @default.
• W2040529401 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2040529401 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2040529401 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2040529401 magId "2040529401" @default.
• W2040529401 workType "article" @default.