FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040555280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040555280 endingPage "1733" @default.
• W2040555280 startingPage "1728" @default.
• W2040555280 abstract "Background This study prospectively evaluated compliance and outcomes after rotator cuff repair in patients with and without Workers' Compensation claims. Materials and methods From December 2007 to January 2010, 42 consecutive patients with Workers' Compensation claims (Work Comp group), and 50 consecutive patients without a Workers' Compensation claim (non-Work Comp group) underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were enrolled in this study. Compliance with a postoperative protocol of shoulder immobilization and physical therapy was documented. Patients were monitored clinically for a minimum of 12 months. Results Noncompliance with protocol was documented in 22 of 42 patients (52%) in the Work Comp group compared with 2 of 50 (4%) in the non-Work Comp group (P < .001). The Work Comp group had less improvement in preoperative to postoperative outcome scores for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (40.4 to 60.1), Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score (3.9 to 6.0) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain (7.0 to 3.5) compared with the non-Work Comp group (ASES, 41.7 to 89.2; SST, 4.3 to 10.7; VAS, 6.2 to 0.35; P < .0001). The compliant Work Comp patients had more favorable results in final outcome scores (ASES, 73.1; SST, 7.9; VAS, 1.5) than noncompliant Work Comp patients (ASES, 48.4; SST, 4.3; VAS, 5.3; P < .0001). Conclusions Patients with Workers' Compensation claims demonstrated a high rate of postoperative noncompliance (52%) compared with patients without Workers' Compensation claims (4%) after rotator cuff repair. Those Workers' Compensation patients who had no evidence of noncompliance had significant improvements and more favorable outcomes than the noncompliant Workers' Compensation patients. This study prospectively evaluated compliance and outcomes after rotator cuff repair in patients with and without Workers' Compensation claims. From December 2007 to January 2010, 42 consecutive patients with Workers' Compensation claims (Work Comp group), and 50 consecutive patients without a Workers' Compensation claim (non-Work Comp group) underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were enrolled in this study. Compliance with a postoperative protocol of shoulder immobilization and physical therapy was documented. Patients were monitored clinically for a minimum of 12 months. Noncompliance with protocol was documented in 22 of 42 patients (52%) in the Work Comp group compared with 2 of 50 (4%) in the non-Work Comp group (P < .001). The Work Comp group had less improvement in preoperative to postoperative outcome scores for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (40.4 to 60.1), Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score (3.9 to 6.0) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain (7.0 to 3.5) compared with the non-Work Comp group (ASES, 41.7 to 89.2; SST, 4.3 to 10.7; VAS, 6.2 to 0.35; P < .0001). The compliant Work Comp patients had more favorable results in final outcome scores (ASES, 73.1; SST, 7.9; VAS, 1.5) than noncompliant Work Comp patients (ASES, 48.4; SST, 4.3; VAS, 5.3; P < .0001). Patients with Workers' Compensation claims demonstrated a high rate of postoperative noncompliance (52%) compared with patients without Workers' Compensation claims (4%) after rotator cuff repair. Those Workers' Compensation patients who had no evidence of noncompliance had significant improvements and more favorable outcomes than the noncompliant Workers' Compensation patients." @default.
• W2040555280 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040555280 creator A5018804922 @default.
• W2040555280 creator A5062684595 @default.
• W2040555280 date "2012-12-01" @default.
• W2040555280 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2040555280 title "Prospective evaluation of postoperative compliance and outcomes after rotator cuff repair in patients with and without workers' compensation claims" @default.
• W2040555280 cites W1958905257 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W1991309555 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2025183659 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2050203267 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2052179271 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2064202896 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2069890645 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2118052504 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2124614356 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2125238899 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2142317008 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2228849844 @default.
• W2040555280 cites W2330262040 @default.
• W2040555280 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.002" @default.
• W2040555280 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22652063" @default.
• W2040555280 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2040555280 type Work @default.
• W2040555280 sameAs 2040555280 @default.
• W2040555280 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802012 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802014 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802015 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802016 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802017 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802018 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802019 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802020 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802021 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802022 @default.
• W2040555280 countsByYear W20405552802023 @default.
• W2040555280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040555280 hasAuthorship W2040555280A5018804922 @default.
• W2040555280 hasAuthorship W2040555280A5062684595 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C2779396721 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C2780023022 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C11171543 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C141071460 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C14184104 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C15744967 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C1862650 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C188816634 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C2776511800 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C2779396721 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C2780017030 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C2780023022 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C2781184374 @default.
• W2040555280 hasConceptScore W2040555280C71924100 @default.
• W2040555280 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2040555280 hasLocation W20405552801 @default.
• W2040555280 hasLocation W20405552802 @default.
• W2040555280 hasOpenAccess W2040555280 @default.
• W2040555280 hasPrimaryLocation W20405552801 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W2104462064 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W2120731539 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W2132081738 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W2140174911 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W2570838451 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W2608979025 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W3113205900 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W3115730242 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W3136492965 @default.
• W2040555280 hasRelatedWork W4210969326 @default.
• W2040555280 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2040555280 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2040555280 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2040555280 magId "2040555280" @default.
• W2040555280 workType "article" @default.