FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040669942> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040669942 endingPage "293" @default.
• W2040669942 startingPage "286" @default.
• W2040669942 abstract "Purpose: To investigate the effects of 3 different tunnel directions on the outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction surgery based on the forces exerted on the replacement ligament from a biomechanical point of view. The 3 tunnel directions in the proximal tibia are medial, central, and lateral. Type of Study: Biomechanical study. Methods: The forces exerted on the replaced PCL were calculated using finite element analyses as well as measurements from 6 cadavers. The results of the 3 surgical approaches were then compared. In the finite element analyses, the replaced ligament was assumed to have nonlinear elastic as well as viscoelastic properties. To simulate the overload in exercise, the femur was forced to move in the anterior direction abruptly while the tibia was held. From numerical analyses, the resultant forces, von Mises stresses, and maximum shear stresses on the replacement PCLs were calculated and compared. In the cadaveric study, a pressure-sensitive thin film was inserted between the replacement PCL and the killer turn area of the tibia. The color changes in films were evaluated using digital image processing in each case. Results: The medial approach showed remarkably higher stresses and forces on the interface between the replaced PCL and the killer turn in both the numerical and cadaveric study. In contrast, the lateral approach showed the lowest stresses. Conclusions: The numerical and cadaveric studies indicate that the lateral approach is highly promising compared with the other approaches. Clinical Relevance: The lateral approach has been shown to minimize stress concentration around the killer turn during in vitro experiments and a computer simulation of PCL reconstruction for long-term stability. The lateral approach technique appears to provide a promising clinical outcome in patients undergoing PCL reconstruction. Purpose: To investigate the effects of 3 different tunnel directions on the outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction surgery based on the forces exerted on the replacement ligament from a biomechanical point of view. The 3 tunnel directions in the proximal tibia are medial, central, and lateral. Type of Study: Biomechanical study. Methods: The forces exerted on the replaced PCL were calculated using finite element analyses as well as measurements from 6 cadavers. The results of the 3 surgical approaches were then compared. In the finite element analyses, the replaced ligament was assumed to have nonlinear elastic as well as viscoelastic properties. To simulate the overload in exercise, the femur was forced to move in the anterior direction abruptly while the tibia was held. From numerical analyses, the resultant forces, von Mises stresses, and maximum shear stresses on the replacement PCLs were calculated and compared. In the cadaveric study, a pressure-sensitive thin film was inserted between the replacement PCL and the killer turn area of the tibia. The color changes in films were evaluated using digital image processing in each case. Results: The medial approach showed remarkably higher stresses and forces on the interface between the replaced PCL and the killer turn in both the numerical and cadaveric study. In contrast, the lateral approach showed the lowest stresses. Conclusions: The numerical and cadaveric studies indicate that the lateral approach is highly promising compared with the other approaches. Clinical Relevance: The lateral approach has been shown to minimize stress concentration around the killer turn during in vitro experiments and a computer simulation of PCL reconstruction for long-term stability. The lateral approach technique appears to provide a promising clinical outcome in patients undergoing PCL reconstruction." @default.
• W2040669942 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040669942 creator A5000338090 @default.
• W2040669942 creator A5005127243 @default.
• W2040669942 creator A5017979113 @default.
• W2040669942 creator A5020156332 @default.
• W2040669942 creator A5055445732 @default.
• W2040669942 creator A5087132038 @default.
• W2040669942 date "2005-03-01" @default.
• W2040669942 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2040669942 title "Biomechanical comparisons of three different tibial tunnel directions in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" @default.
• W2040669942 cites W1950494597 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W1983467405 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W1984893925 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2007774025 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2022630314 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2023409361 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2034265579 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2035380715 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2040025086 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2045053885 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2076385189 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2108322607 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2148149938 @default.
• W2040669942 cites W2158986503 @default.
• W2040669942 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.11.004" @default.
• W2040669942 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15756181" @default.
• W2040669942 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2040669942 type Work @default.
• W2040669942 sameAs 2040669942 @default.
• W2040669942 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422012 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422013 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422014 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422015 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422016 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422017 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422018 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422019 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422020 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422021 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422022 @default.
• W2040669942 countsByYear W20406699422023 @default.
• W2040669942 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040669942 hasAuthorship W2040669942A5000338090 @default.
• W2040669942 hasAuthorship W2040669942A5005127243 @default.
• W2040669942 hasAuthorship W2040669942A5017979113 @default.
• W2040669942 hasAuthorship W2040669942A5020156332 @default.
• W2040669942 hasAuthorship W2040669942A5055445732 @default.
• W2040669942 hasAuthorship W2040669942A5087132038 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C135628077 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C155165730 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C186541917 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C2779372316 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C2779753412 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C2780345532 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C2780554211 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C105702510 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C127413603 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C135628077 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C136229726 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C141071460 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C155165730 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C159985019 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C170700871 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C175696284 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C186541917 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C192562407 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C2777236700 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C2778434673 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C2779372316 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C2779753412 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C2780345532 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C2780554211 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C29694066 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C66938386 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C71924100 @default.
• W2040669942 hasConceptScore W2040669942C91762617 @default.
• W2040669942 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2040669942 hasLocation W20406699421 @default.
• W2040669942 hasLocation W20406699422 @default.
• W2040669942 hasOpenAccess W2040669942 @default.
• W2040669942 hasPrimaryLocation W20406699421 @default.
• W2040669942 hasRelatedWork W190851275 @default.

• next