FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040697055> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040697055 endingPage "20" @default.
• W2040697055 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2040697055 abstract "New Evidence for the Canons of the First Lateran Council Louis I. Hamilton and Martin Brett The manuscript and its context The tradition of the canons of the Lateran Council (1123) has not been established despite its profound significance. I.S. Robinson has rightly described the Council as ‘the last occasion when the characteristic Gregorian reform programme dominated conciliar legislation’.1 In part two of this article, Martin Brett explains in detail the difficulties in establishing such a tradition and the limits of the standard edition available in the Conciliorum oecumenicorum decreta.2 In this first part, I shall introduce new evidence for the canons found in Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Santa Croce Plut. 9.dex.1, a copy of the Expositio in Pentateuchum by Bruno of Segni, who died on July 18 1123, three months after the conclusion of the council, which he may have attended.3 Since it is complete and one of the earliest extant copies, it is a significant exemplar of Bruno’s commentary. The twelfth-century manuscript had been owned by Santa Croce, but was removed to the Laurenziana in 1766 by an act of the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Pietro Leopoldo (1747-†1792), in which he dissolved the venerable Franciscan library.4 It is comprised of 170 folios and is 190 × 280mm. The [End Page 1] catalog of 1777 describes the codex as twelfth century and as containing ‘in between pages 75b and 76 in the same antique hand as above’ some ‘ecclesiastical sanctions’.5 The online catalog lists the manuscript as dated between 1100-1110, a very precise date for which I have found no support.6 This dating is certainly incorrect as the materials at folios 75v and 76r are, indeed, ‘ecclesiastical sanctions’, and more precisely are canons produced in 1123 at the First Lateran Council.7 Therefore the manuscript must be later than April of 1123. If the proper postquem is 1123, then the ante-quem may be 1136 when the most obvious source for or recipient of the canons, the bishop of Florence, Goffredo (1113-1136, † 1142), was forced into exile. That presumes the manuscript is Florentine in its origin and was not brought to Florence from elsewhere in Italy by the Franciscans of Santa Croce. At present there is no way to say this definitively. The manuscript is made up of quires of irregular numbers of folios although no material is missing from the text.8 The tenth [End Page 2] quire is a quaterno, the last folios of which contain the canons at 75v and 76r.9 The text of the commentary at 75r ends a little more than two-thirds down the folio with room for an additional twelve lines of text. The catchwords, ‘et nisi his’, at the lower right of 75r correspond to the incipit of 77r. At the lower left (interior gutter) is the word ‘explicit’, perhaps intended to signal the intentional point of the break in the commentary. The canons are copied (without a ‘proemium’) beginning at the top of 75v, commencing with the first canon of the COD edition. The canons continue at the top of 76r with canons 10b, 12, and 11. The remaining three quarters of the folio is cut away and 76r is left as a stub. This could allow folio 76 to serve as a kind of bookmark for the reader to find these canons easily, as it did in my experience with the manuscript. 76v is intentionally left blank. At 77r Bruno’s commentary continues without any lost text (with ‘et nisi his’) in the same hand that had been copying the previous material. In the estimation of the eighteenth-century catalog, the same hand copied out the canons. The change in format of the canons makes it difficult to say with certainty. The Laurenziana manuscript represents a unique tradition of the canons of the Lateran Council of 1123, a fact that has not been previously appreciated.10 It is decidedly shorter than the ‘alpha’ or ‘beta’ traditions of the COD and represents the second shortest version of the canons presently known. Only Bibliothèque nationale de France lat. 152, fol. 44, with which it shares the..." @default.
• W2040697055 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040697055 creator A5025300330 @default.
• W2040697055 creator A5066475773 @default.
• W2040697055 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2040697055 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2040697055 title "New Evidence for the Canons of the First Lateran Council" @default.
• W2040697055 cites W2058102743 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W2323466191 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W2518332444 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W2518419825 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W2605471951 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W3140386466 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W619196420 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W621266742 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W641512637 @default.
• W2040697055 cites W3204792257 @default.
• W2040697055 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/bmc.2013.0011" @default.
• W2040697055 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2040697055 type Work @default.
• W2040697055 sameAs 2040697055 @default.
• W2040697055 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2040697055 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040697055 hasAuthorship W2040697055A5025300330 @default.
• W2040697055 hasAuthorship W2040697055A5066475773 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C178300618 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C2778069335 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C2780376419 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C2994491059 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C142362112 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C15708023 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C166957645 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C17744445 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C178300618 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C195244886 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C199539241 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C2777351106 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C2778069335 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C2779343474 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C2780376419 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C2994491059 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C74916050 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C78458016 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C86803240 @default.
• W2040697055 hasConceptScore W2040697055C95457728 @default.
• W2040697055 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2040697055 hasLocation W20406970551 @default.
• W2040697055 hasOpenAccess W2040697055 @default.
• W2040697055 hasPrimaryLocation W20406970551 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W1602422384 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W2020629760 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W2134252292 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W2604389016 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W3117294688 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W3152062295 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W4211209675 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W4297851961 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W617173514 @default.
• W2040697055 hasRelatedWork W658924744 @default.
• W2040697055 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2040697055 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2040697055 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2040697055 magId "2040697055" @default.
• W2040697055 workType "article" @default.