FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040713021> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040713021 endingPage "37" @default.
• W2040713021 startingPage "37" @default.
• W2040713021 abstract "Aim: The aim of the following study is to assess the efficacy of Raal ointment (herbal plant resin) compared with 1% silver sulfadiazine cream as a burn dressing for the treatment of second degree burns covering less than 30% of the body surface area. Materials and Methods: A randomized comparative study was carried out at our institute during August 2010 to June 2012. Ethical committee permission was obtained. Written informed consent was taken from each patient. Fifty patients with second degree burn wounds of approximately equal size present on both half of the body were selected. One side of the wound was treated with silver sulfadiazine cream and the other side of the wound was treated with Raal ointment. Raal ointment is an herbal product made up of resin of Shorea robusta plant. Both the wounds were assessed for parameters such as pain, infection, rate of healing and resultant scar. Results: The average pain score was 7.02 (Scale 0-10) in silver sulphadizine cream group when compared with 5.14 in the Raal ointment group at the end of 24 h (P < 0.0001). At 48 h the average pain score was 6.12 in silver sulfadiazine group, whereas it was 3.86 in the Raal ointment group (P < 0.0001). The result was statistically significant. Infection rate was 20% in silver sulfadiazine group and was only 12% in Raal ointment group. In Silver sulfadiazine group healing was achieved on an average of 19.06 days. In Raal ointment group, it took an average of 17.2 days (P < 0.0001). This shows that Raal ointment dressing helps in decreasing healing time when compared with silver sulfadiazine cream dressing. Resultant scar of both groups were assessed using Vancouver scar scale at the end of 10 weeks and 14 weeks. Both the treatment groups had equal quality of scar at 10 and 14 weeks. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by comparing the cost of the same amount of silver sulfadiazine cream and Raal ointment. Raal ointment was a cost-effective alternative to silver sulfadiazine cream for treatment of burn wound. Conclusion: Raal ointment was found superior in pain control, rate of healing, control of infection and cost-effectiveness than silver sulfadiazine cream for treatment of second degree burns." @default.
• W2040713021 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040713021 creator A5014078505 @default.
• W2040713021 creator A5048345049 @default.
• W2040713021 creator A5056896759 @default.
• W2040713021 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2040713021 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2040713021 title "Raal ointment compared with 1% silver sulfadiazine cream for the treatment of second degree burns" @default.
• W2040713021 cites W3048184307 @default.
• W2040713021 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-653x.146999" @default.
• W2040713021 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2040713021 type Work @default.
• W2040713021 sameAs 2040713021 @default.
• W2040713021 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2040713021 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040713021 hasAuthorship W2040713021A5014078505 @default.
• W2040713021 hasAuthorship W2040713021A5048345049 @default.
• W2040713021 hasAuthorship W2040713021A5056896759 @default.
• W2040713021 hasBestOaLocation W20407130211 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C2776532303 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C2776782833 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C2778269047 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C2780269544 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C2910546076 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C2994123057 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C3019879682 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C141071460 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C16005928 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C2776532303 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C2776782833 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C2778269047 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C2780269544 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C2910546076 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C2994123057 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C3019879682 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C42219234 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C501593827 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C71924100 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C86803240 @default.
• W2040713021 hasConceptScore W2040713021C89423630 @default.
• W2040713021 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2040713021 hasLocation W20407130211 @default.
• W2040713021 hasOpenAccess W2040713021 @default.
• W2040713021 hasPrimaryLocation W20407130211 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W2002041297 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W2020601711 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W2354858927 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W2611620540 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W2911789774 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W3144519150 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W4249149635 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W4285550790 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W4312184957 @default.
• W2040713021 hasRelatedWork W867702652 @default.
• W2040713021 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W2040713021 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2040713021 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2040713021 magId "2040713021" @default.
• W2040713021 workType "article" @default.