FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2040804974> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2040804974 endingPage "242" @default.
• W2040804974 startingPage "224" @default.
• W2040804974 abstract "Observations are presented on chromosomal aberrations in root-tip mitoses and microsporogenesis in plants grown from x-rayed dormant seeds of barley. The study was made as part of a considerable number of experiments over a period of five years. In all tests x-radiation was applied at 34 KVP and 27 ma. Dosages ranged from 0 to 32, 000 r.It was concluded that chromosomes in the resting embryo ordinarily responded to x-radiation as though they were monopartite, because induced breaks were almost always chromosomal breaks rather than chromatid breaks. This conclusion was based on: 1) the high frequency of paired, apparently identical dicentric chromosomal bridges and acentric fragments at anaphase in somatic cells of root tips; 2) the presence of unlike ends on some of these dicentric chromosomes; 3) the relatively rare occurrence of single bridges in these somatic anaphases.The rarity of single bridges at anaphase in somatic cells, in contrast with the frequency of paired bridges (even at low dosages), also was interpreted as indicating that the fusion of sister chromatids at a common breakage point, or following splitting of a chromosome during seed germination, did not often occur. Unlike ends on a dicentric chromosome also would not be expected if broken ends of sister strands fused.Usually two acentric chromatinic fragments do not join. Evidence for this is the fact that acentric fragments usually occurred in pairs (ranging in size from minute dots to rods as long as a normal chromosome) rather than as V's or rings as would be the case if their broken ends united. Thus, it seems that the centromere plays an important part in the union of broken ends of chromosome fragments.The observations suggest that acentric fragments are able to undergo one division, but do not persist beyond the subsequent resting stage. This opinion is based on the fact that these fragments usually occurred in pairs at somatic metaphase and anaphase, as though a piece of chromatin had reduplicated. If these fragments went into the telophase stage, returned to the condensed state and redivided again, quadruplet fragments should have been seen occasionally, but were not. However, it is true that most of the experimental observations were believed to have been made on the first cell division following radiation.At anaphase the acentric fragments were distributed freely in the cytoplasm, although they seemed to occur most frequently in the region of the equatorial plate. There was no evidence of any attraction between the fragments and the pole.Evidently a centric fragment attached itself as often to an acentric as to another centric fragment. This conclusion is based on the fact that there was a reasonably close parallelism between the frequencies of pairs of dicentric bridges in root tip cells (resulting from a union between two centric fragments) and interchanges in pollen mother cells (resulting from a union between a centric and an acentric fragment). If this relationship is proved to be true, it should be possible to predict fairly accurately the frequency of spikes with interchanges in their microsporocytes from the frequency of bridges in cells of root tips taken from seeds given the same x-ray treatment.Evidence is presented (see Discussion) which indicates that ordinarily, broken ends of chromosomes unite shortly after the breakage takes place. That is, most of the results were consistent with the theory that exchanges between irradiated chromosomes are usually the result of simultaneous breakage and fusion. However, a few observations seem to be accounted for most logically if it is assumed that delayed attachments between fragments occasionally do occur.Observations at meiosis in 3, 509 spikes revealed that the most common aberration was a ring-of-four (in 371 spikes), resulting from a simple reciprocal translocation." @default.
• W2040804974 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2040804974 creator A5000755559 @default.
• W2040804974 creator A5034320423 @default.
• W2040804974 date "1952-01-01" @default.
• W2040804974 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2040804974 title "A Study of X-ray-induced Chromosomal Aberrations in Barley" @default.
• W2040804974 cites W1714300698 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W1796494400 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W1841550587 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W1965184721 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W1988832178 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W1990815186 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2050068752 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2055180647 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2056316644 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2086225090 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2114480902 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2126132071 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2127808875 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2168126465 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2169856343 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2240304483 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2319420951 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2320305685 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2333289064 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2342052867 @default.
• W2040804974 cites W2521679402 @default.
• W2040804974 doi "https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.17.224" @default.
• W2040804974 hasPublicationYear "1952" @default.
• W2040804974 type Work @default.
• W2040804974 sameAs 2040804974 @default.
• W2040804974 citedByCount "76" @default.
• W2040804974 countsByYear W20408049742018 @default.
• W2040804974 countsByYear W20408049742019 @default.
• W2040804974 countsByYear W20408049742022 @default.
• W2040804974 countsByYear W20408049742023 @default.
• W2040804974 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2040804974 hasAuthorship W2040804974A5000755559 @default.
• W2040804974 hasAuthorship W2040804974A5034320423 @default.
• W2040804974 hasBestOaLocation W20408049741 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C103037022 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C134305767 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C30481170 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C53226629 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C53420372 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C73397532 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C8502773 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConcept C93304396 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C103037022 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C104317684 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C134305767 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C30481170 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C53226629 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C53420372 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C54355233 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C73397532 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C8502773 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C86803240 @default.
• W2040804974 hasConceptScore W2040804974C93304396 @default.
• W2040804974 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2040804974 hasLocation W20408049741 @default.
• W2040804974 hasOpenAccess W2040804974 @default.
• W2040804974 hasPrimaryLocation W20408049741 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W1964154770 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W1995920022 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W1998536734 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W2040804974 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W2068045797 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W2073013154 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W2089240818 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W2283738785 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W2911601209 @default.
• W2040804974 hasRelatedWork W2414998850 @default.
• W2040804974 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2040804974 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2040804974 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2040804974 magId "2040804974" @default.
• W2040804974 workType "article" @default.