Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2041416381> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W2041416381 endingPage "125" @default.
- W2041416381 startingPage "125" @default.
- W2041416381 abstract "The public and other medical specialties expect dermatologists who offer cosmetic dermatology services to provide competent care. There are numerous barriers to achieving cosmetic dermatology competency during residency. Many dermatology residents enter the workforce planning to provide cosmetic services. If a training gap exists, this may adversely affect patient safety.To identify resources available for hands-on cosmetic dermatology training in US dermatology residency training programs and to assess program director (PD) attitudes toward cosmetic dermatology training during residency and strategies, including discounted pricing, used by training programs to overcome barriers related to resident-performed cosmetic dermatology procedures.An online survey in academic dermatology practices among PDs of US dermatology residency programs.Frequency of cosmetic dermatology devices and injectables used for dermatology resident hands-on cosmetic dermatology training, categorizing PD attitudes toward cosmetic dermatology training during residency and describing residency-related discounted pricing models.Responses from PDs were received from 53 of 114 (46%) US dermatology residency programs. All but 3 programs (94%) offered hands-on cosmetic dermatology training using botulinum toxin, and 47 of 53 (89%) provided training with hyaluronic acid fillers. Pulsed dye lasers represented the most common laser use experienced by residents (41 of 52 [79%]), followed by Q-switched Nd:YAG (30 of 52 [58%]). Discounted procedures were offered by 32 of 53 (60%) programs, with botulinum toxin (30 of 32 [94%]) and fillers (27 of 32 [84%]) most prevalent and with vascular lasers (17 of 32 [53%]) and hair removal lasers (12 of 32 [38%]) less common. Various discounting methods were used. Only 20 of 53 (38%) PDs believed that cosmetic dermatology should be a necessary aspect of residency training; 14 of 52 (27%) PDs thought that residents should not be required to perform any cosmetic dermatology procedures.Although almost every program provides hands-on cosmetic dermatology training, there are barriers to training, including patient preferences, costs of procedures and products, and PD attitudes toward cosmetic dermatology training. To promote patient safety, procedural competency is imperative." @default.
- W2041416381 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2041416381 creator A5050370900 @default.
- W2041416381 creator A5066165245 @default.
- W2041416381 creator A5090347662 @default.
- W2041416381 date "2014-02-01" @default.
- W2041416381 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2041416381 title "Cosmetic Dermatologic Surgical Training in US Dermatology Residency Programs" @default.
- W2041416381 cites W2017638631 @default.
- W2041416381 cites W2044560395 @default.
- W2041416381 cites W2083700754 @default.
- W2041416381 cites W2085237707 @default.
- W2041416381 cites W2093060360 @default.
- W2041416381 cites W2114904729 @default.
- W2041416381 cites W2152094988 @default.
- W2041416381 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6713" @default.
- W2041416381 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24337066" @default.
- W2041416381 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2041416381 type Work @default.
- W2041416381 sameAs 2041416381 @default.
- W2041416381 citedByCount "26" @default.
- W2041416381 countsByYear W20414163812015 @default.
- W2041416381 countsByYear W20414163812018 @default.
- W2041416381 countsByYear W20414163812020 @default.
- W2041416381 countsByYear W20414163812021 @default.
- W2041416381 countsByYear W20414163812022 @default.
- W2041416381 countsByYear W20414163812023 @default.
- W2041416381 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2041416381 hasAuthorship W2041416381A5050370900 @default.
- W2041416381 hasAuthorship W2041416381A5066165245 @default.
- W2041416381 hasAuthorship W2041416381A5090347662 @default.
- W2041416381 hasBestOaLocation W20414163811 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C2778139618 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C2988064887 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C3019285220 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C16005928 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C162324750 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C2778139618 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C2988064887 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C3019285220 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C50522688 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C509550671 @default.
- W2041416381 hasConceptScore W2041416381C71924100 @default.
- W2041416381 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2041416381 hasLocation W20414163811 @default.
- W2041416381 hasLocation W20414163812 @default.
- W2041416381 hasOpenAccess W2041416381 @default.
- W2041416381 hasPrimaryLocation W20414163811 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W152676104 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W2000300732 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W2006778349 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W2038480245 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W2054384085 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W2580916552 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W2804114450 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W2806952999 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W4210281096 @default.
- W2041416381 hasRelatedWork W4297184974 @default.
- W2041416381 hasVolume "150" @default.
- W2041416381 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2041416381 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2041416381 magId "2041416381" @default.
- W2041416381 workType "article" @default.