FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2042414952> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2042414952 endingPage "137" @default.
• W2042414952 startingPage "128" @default.
• W2042414952 abstract "Since 2001, the US government has used its power as a leading donor to family planning programmes to pursue policies in conflict with global agreements on reproductive rights. Prominent among these policies is the Mexico City Policy (or Global Gag Rule), which restricts non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in developing countries that receive USAID family planning funding from engaging in most abortion-related activities, even with their own funds. This paper reviews the history and political origins of the Gag Rule under several Republican party presidents. The Gag Rule has not achieved an overall reduction in abortions; rather, where it has disrupted family planning services, the policy is more likely to have increased the number of abortions. This paper concludes that the Gag Rule is a radical intrusion on the rights and autonomy of recipients of US funding. Regardless of whether or not it is rescinded in future, the underlying issues in the politics of US reproductive health assistance are likely to persist. NGOs that wish to free themselves from the constraints it imposes must find the means to end their dependence on USAID funding, including turning to other donors. NGOs should also take the lead in opposing policies such as the Gag Rule that violate global agreements.RésuméDepuis 2001, le Gouvernement américain utilise son pouvoir comme principal donateur des programmes de planification familiale pour prôner des politiques en conflit avec les accords mondiaux sur les droits génésiques. Parmi ces politiques figure en bonne place la ≪ politique de Mexico ≫ (ou règle du bâillon mondial) qui interdit aux organisations non gouvernementales (ONG) des pays en développement qui reçoivent un financement pour planification familiale de l'USAID de participer à la plupart des activités liées à l'avortement, même avec leurs fonds propres. Cet article retrace l'histoire et les origines politiques de cette interdiction sous plusieurs présidents républicains. Cette politique n'a pas réduit sensiblement les avortements; au contraire, là où elle a désorganisé les services de planification familiale, elle a probablement accru le nombre d'avortements. L'article en conclut que cette règle est une ingérence dans les droits et l'autonomie des bénéficiaires du financement américain. Qu'elle soit ou non levée à l'avenir, les questions fondamentales dans la politique de l'aide américaine à la santé génésique devraient demeurer. Les ONG qui souhaitent s'affranchir des constraintes que cette règle impose doivent trouver les moyens de mettre fin à leur dépendance financière de l'USAID, notamment en cherchant d'autres donateurs. Elles doivent aussi prendre la tête de l'opposition à de telles politiques, qui violent les accords internationaux.ResumenDesde el año 2001, el gobierno de EE.UU. ha usado su poder como uno de los donantes principales a los programas de planificación familiar, para poner en práctica polı́ticas opuestas a los acuerdos mundiales sobre los derechos reproductivos. Entre ellas se destaca la Polı́tica de la Ciudad de México (o Ley Mordaza), la cual prohibe que las organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG) en los paı́ses en desarrollo que reciben financiamiento para planificación familiar de la USAID participen en la mayorı́a de las actividades relacionadas con el aborto, incluso con sus propios fondos. En este artı́culo se revisan la historia y los orı́genes polı́ticos de la Ley Mordaza bajo el mandato de varios presidentes del partido Republicano. La Ley Mordaza no ha logrado una disminución general en el ı́ndice de abortos; por lo contrario, donde ha obstaculizado los servicios de planificación familiar, es más probable que haya contribuido a su aumento. Se concluye que la Ley Mordaza es una invasión radical de los derechos y la autonomı́a de las entidades que reciben financiamiento de EE.UU. Que la ley se anule o no en el futuro, es probable que continúen los aspectos subyacentes en la polı́tica de EE.UU. con respecto a la ayuda financiera en salud reproductiva. Las ONG que desean liberarse de las restricciones que impone dicha ley deben encontrar los medios para dar fin a su dependencia del financiamiento de la USAID, por ejemplo acudiendo a otros donantes. Además, deben tomar la iniciativa de oponerse a las polı́ticas tales como la Ley Mordaza que violan los acuerdos mundiales." @default.
• W2042414952 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2042414952 creator A5003322391 @default.
• W2042414952 creator A5006625368 @default.
• W2042414952 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W2042414952 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2042414952 title "Power and Politics in International Funding for Reproductive Health: the US Global Gag Rule" @default.
• W2042414952 cites W2319801841 @default.
• W2042414952 cites W2476634143 @default.
• W2042414952 cites W3126001488 @default.
• W2042414952 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(04)24140-4" @default.
• W2042414952 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15626203" @default.
• W2042414952 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2042414952 type Work @default.
• W2042414952 sameAs 2042414952 @default.
• W2042414952 citedByCount "108" @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522012 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522013 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522014 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522015 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522016 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522017 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522018 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522019 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522020 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522021 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522022 @default.
• W2042414952 countsByYear W20424149522023 @default.
• W2042414952 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2042414952 hasAuthorship W2042414952A5003322391 @default.
• W2042414952 hasAuthorship W2042414952A5006625368 @default.
• W2042414952 hasBestOaLocation W20424149521 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C121752807 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C2777749871 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C121752807 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C144024400 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C149923435 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C162324750 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C17744445 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C199539241 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C2777749871 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C2778642596 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C2779076696 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C2779234561 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C2908647359 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C2986817661 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C3116431 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C50522688 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C54355233 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C65414064 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C86803240 @default.
• W2042414952 hasConceptScore W2042414952C94625758 @default.
• W2042414952 hasIssue "24" @default.
• W2042414952 hasLocation W20424149521 @default.
• W2042414952 hasLocation W20424149522 @default.
• W2042414952 hasOpenAccess W2042414952 @default.
• W2042414952 hasPrimaryLocation W20424149521 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W2098673981 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W2122169076 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W2165424557 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W2275136242 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W2278508065 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W2305801483 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W3121487401 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W3124077885 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W3142435030 @default.
• W2042414952 hasRelatedWork W4243993460 @default.
• W2042414952 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W2042414952 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2042414952 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2042414952 magId "2042414952" @default.
• W2042414952 workType "article" @default.