Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W204262915> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 49 of
49
with 100 items per page.
- W204262915 endingPage "260" @default.
- W204262915 startingPage "250" @default.
- W204262915 abstract "I n the preceding article we have seen that Enriques and, indeed, the whole Italian school of algebraic geometry in the first half of the twentieth centurywere frustratedbyone glaring gap in their theory of algebraic surfaces. This magnificent theory answered essentially all the basic questions about algebraic surfaces and hadbeenconstructedusingpurely geometric tools. But one of its central theorems seemed to defy all their attempts to give it a geometric proof. It had been proven by analytic means by Poincare with his theory of “normal functions”, so the theory was sound—but this approach was alien to their intuitions. It wasmuch like the need for analysis in proving the prime number theorem before Selberg found his elementary proof. In my own education, I had assumed they were irrevocably stuck, and it was not until I learned of Grothendieck’s theory of schemes and his strong existence theorems for the Picard scheme that I saw that a purely algebrogeometric proof was indeed possible. I say here “algebro-geometric”, not “geometric”, because the first requirement in moving ahead had been the introduction of new algebraic tools into the subject first by Zariski and Weil and subsequently by Serre and Grothendieck. When Professors Babbitt and Goodstein wrote me about Enriques’s work in the 1930s, I realized that the full story was more complex. As I see it now, Enriques must be credited with a nearly complete geometric proof using, as did" @default.
- W204262915 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W204262915 creator A5029608310 @default.
- W204262915 date "2011-01-01" @default.
- W204262915 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W204262915 title "Intuition and rigor and Enriques's quest" @default.
- W204262915 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W204262915 type Work @default.
- W204262915 sameAs 204262915 @default.
- W204262915 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W204262915 countsByYear W2042629152012 @default.
- W204262915 countsByYear W2042629152013 @default.
- W204262915 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W204262915 hasAuthorship W204262915A5029608310 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C113429393 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C118615104 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C136119220 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C169654258 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C40758505 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C68363185 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C69653121 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C88221313 @default.
- W204262915 hasConcept C9376300 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C113429393 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C118615104 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C134306372 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C136119220 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C169654258 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C202444582 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C33923547 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C40758505 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C68363185 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C69653121 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C88221313 @default.
- W204262915 hasConceptScore W204262915C9376300 @default.
- W204262915 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W204262915 hasOpenAccess W204262915 @default.
- W204262915 hasRelatedWork W186601558 @default.
- W204262915 hasRelatedWork W2067969625 @default.
- W204262915 hasVolume "58" @default.
- W204262915 isParatext "false" @default.
- W204262915 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W204262915 magId "204262915" @default.
- W204262915 workType "article" @default.