FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2043104702> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2043104702 abstract "Abstract Two models for explaining the demand for natural resources are developed for the period 1900–1969. The first model relates demands for total natural resources and five sub-categories to the size of the economy, real prices, and the state of technology. The second model relates the intensity of use of resource categories and sub-categories to real prices and technology. The major findings are that the United States has been using raw materials more efficiently through time during this century and that the current state of the data base is not sufficient to choose between alternative hypotheses of the determinants of intensity of use. Directions of future work are indicated. PART 1 PART 1 OVERVIEW The subject of raw material demands with respect to economic growth has become an increasingly important one, especially in the area of energy. In 1974 in a paper presented before the Council of Economics, Dr. Malenbaum proposed a law of demand for minerals, including proposed a law of demand for minerals, including fuels. His thesis was that the intensity of use of a mineral; i.e., consumption of the mineral per unit of gross national product (GNP), is a function of GNP per capita. Further, he stated that the shape of this function was an inverted U; that is, as per capita GNP increased, consumption per unit of output for a mineral would increase, reach a maximum, and then decline. The data lying behind the Malenbaum hypothesis related to specific mineral commodities, such as copper or iron and steel, and his reported data covered a short span of time. In an earlier article, I (the senior author) explored the Malenbaum hypothesis. I concluded that a metal by metal analysis of intensity of use through time is most likely picking up substitution phenomena rather than fundamental tendencies phenomena rather than fundamental tendencies in the demand for total raw materials. This is illustrated clearly when one puts in juxtaposition the trends for aluminum and copper, and combines them in terms of relative weights. Further, the shift from goods to services is not necessarily a raw material saving shift. Thus, changes in the composition of GNP as per capita income rises may not be an adequate explanation for the inverted U posited by Malenbaum. I concluded my posited by Malenbaum. I concluded my examination of Malenbaum as follows: My preliminary work leads me to believe that the major phenomena that must be understood are the process of substitution and the relationship of materials demands to technological progress." @default.
• W2043104702 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2043104702 creator A5005443606 @default.
• W2043104702 creator A5057980240 @default.
• W2043104702 date "1977-03-06" @default.
• W2043104702 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2043104702 title "The Demand for Natural Resources Revisited" @default.
• W2043104702 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/6965-ms" @default.
• W2043104702 hasPublicationYear "1977" @default.
• W2043104702 type Work @default.
• W2043104702 sameAs 2043104702 @default.
• W2043104702 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2043104702 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2043104702 hasAuthorship W2043104702A5005443606 @default.
• W2043104702 hasAuthorship W2043104702A5057980240 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C2776608160 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C29985473 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C127313418 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C151730666 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C162324750 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C175605778 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C17744445 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C199539241 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C2776608160 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C29985473 @default.
• W2043104702 hasConceptScore W2043104702C41008148 @default.
• W2043104702 hasLocation W20431047021 @default.
• W2043104702 hasOpenAccess W2043104702 @default.
• W2043104702 hasPrimaryLocation W20431047021 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W1529710697 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W1532306612 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W1539285921 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W1541791126 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W1608885654 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W1972172802 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2004989157 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2006015105 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2010593085 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2019395668 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W207636078 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2169579131 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2243679430 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2248911103 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2377046553 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2378099085 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W2979151444 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W3021436211 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W3123375604 @default.
• W2043104702 hasRelatedWork W42974151 @default.
• W2043104702 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2043104702 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2043104702 magId "2043104702" @default.
• W2043104702 workType "article" @default.