Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2043156901> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2043156901 endingPage "563" @default.
- W2043156901 startingPage "558" @default.
- W2043156901 abstract "Rationale and Objectives Initial data suggest that elastography can improve the specificity of ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The aim of this study was to compare elastography and B-mode ultrasound to determine whether the calculation of strain ratios (SRs) can further improve the differentiation of focal breast lesions. Materials and Methods A total of 227 women with histologically proven focal breast lesions (113 benign, 114 malignant) were included at two German breast centers. The women underwent a standardized ultrasound procedure using a high-end ultrasound system with a 9-MHz broadband linear transducer. B-mode scans and sonoelastograms were analyzed by two experienced readers using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria. SRs were calculated from a tumor-adjusted region of interest (mean color pixel density) and a comparable region of interest placed in the lateral fatty tissue. Sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values were calculated for SRs (receiver-operating characteristic analysis). Results The women had a mean age of 54 years (range, 19–87 years). The mean lesion diameter was 1.6 ± 0.9 cm. Sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 56% for B-mode scanning, 81% and 89% for elastography, and 90% and 89% for SRs. An SR cutoff value of 2.45 (area under the curve, 0.949) allowed significant differentiation (P < .001) of malignant (mean, 5.1 ± 4.2) and benign (mean, 1.6 ± 1.0) lesions. The quantitative method of SR calculation was superior to subjective interpretation of sonoelastograms and B-mode scans, with a positive predictive value of 89% compared to 68% and 84% for the other two methods. Conclusions Calculation of SRs contributes to the standardization of sonoelastography with high sensitivity and allows significant differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions with higher specificity compared to B-mode ultrasound but not elastography. Initial data suggest that elastography can improve the specificity of ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The aim of this study was to compare elastography and B-mode ultrasound to determine whether the calculation of strain ratios (SRs) can further improve the differentiation of focal breast lesions. A total of 227 women with histologically proven focal breast lesions (113 benign, 114 malignant) were included at two German breast centers. The women underwent a standardized ultrasound procedure using a high-end ultrasound system with a 9-MHz broadband linear transducer. B-mode scans and sonoelastograms were analyzed by two experienced readers using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria. SRs were calculated from a tumor-adjusted region of interest (mean color pixel density) and a comparable region of interest placed in the lateral fatty tissue. Sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values were calculated for SRs (receiver-operating characteristic analysis). The women had a mean age of 54 years (range, 19–87 years). The mean lesion diameter was 1.6 ± 0.9 cm. Sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 56% for B-mode scanning, 81% and 89% for elastography, and 90% and 89% for SRs. An SR cutoff value of 2.45 (area under the curve, 0.949) allowed significant differentiation (P < .001) of malignant (mean, 5.1 ± 4.2) and benign (mean, 1.6 ± 1.0) lesions. The quantitative method of SR calculation was superior to subjective interpretation of sonoelastograms and B-mode scans, with a positive predictive value of 89% compared to 68% and 84% for the other two methods. Calculation of SRs contributes to the standardization of sonoelastography with high sensitivity and allows significant differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions with higher specificity compared to B-mode ultrasound but not elastography." @default.
- W2043156901 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2043156901 creator A5008751087 @default.
- W2043156901 creator A5043412893 @default.
- W2043156901 creator A5053516944 @default.
- W2043156901 creator A5067128699 @default.
- W2043156901 creator A5072310624 @default.
- W2043156901 creator A5077033598 @default.
- W2043156901 date "2010-05-01" @default.
- W2043156901 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2043156901 title "Significant Differentiation of Focal Breast Lesions" @default.
- W2043156901 cites W1961632191 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W1976937402 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W1988431813 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2029594006 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2030505364 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2038403761 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2040218119 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2042473364 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2046429899 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2066999675 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2071027495 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2084985476 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2094703482 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2102053721 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2104592318 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2105730019 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2132290789 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2137299718 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2143965649 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2150681820 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2153497134 @default.
- W2043156901 cites W2170800046 @default.
- W2043156901 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.006" @default.
- W2043156901 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20171905" @default.
- W2043156901 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2043156901 type Work @default.
- W2043156901 sameAs 2043156901 @default.
- W2043156901 citedByCount "168" @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012012 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012013 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012014 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012015 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012016 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012017 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012018 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012019 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012020 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012021 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012022 @default.
- W2043156901 countsByYear W20431569012023 @default.
- W2043156901 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2043156901 hasAuthorship W2043156901A5008751087 @default.
- W2043156901 hasAuthorship W2043156901A5043412893 @default.
- W2043156901 hasAuthorship W2043156901A5053516944 @default.
- W2043156901 hasAuthorship W2043156901A5067128699 @default.
- W2043156901 hasAuthorship W2043156901A5072310624 @default.
- W2043156901 hasAuthorship W2043156901A5077033598 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C2777690781 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C2778217198 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C121332964 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C121608353 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C126322002 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C126838900 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C143753070 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C2777432617 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C2777690781 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C2778217198 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C2780472235 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C2989005 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C530470458 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C58471807 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C62520636 @default.
- W2043156901 hasConceptScore W2043156901C71924100 @default.
- W2043156901 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2043156901 hasLocation W20431569011 @default.
- W2043156901 hasLocation W20431569012 @default.
- W2043156901 hasOpenAccess W2043156901 @default.
- W2043156901 hasPrimaryLocation W20431569011 @default.
- W2043156901 hasRelatedWork W2036156876 @default.
- W2043156901 hasRelatedWork W2301258522 @default.
- W2043156901 hasRelatedWork W2324256900 @default.
- W2043156901 hasRelatedWork W2389925794 @default.
- W2043156901 hasRelatedWork W2594607749 @default.
- W2043156901 hasRelatedWork W2907118614 @default.
- W2043156901 hasRelatedWork W2970989256 @default.