FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2043297575> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2043297575 endingPage "190" @default.
• W2043297575 startingPage "170" @default.
• W2043297575 abstract "A Redirection in Neo-Evolutionism?A Retrospective Examination of the Algonquian Family Hunting Territories Debates Siomonn Pulla (bio) This article explores the intellectual networks and debates within anthropology that maintained considerable influence on the practical and theoretical aspects of Frank Speck's intellectual development and the broader debates around the notion of Algonquian family hunting territories in anthropology. In particular I explore how the early debates around the family hunting territory concept reflect key redirections in neo-evolutionary theory during the 1930s and ultimately suggest a proleptic methodological modernism in anthropology. The result is a useful and engaged history of the development of the main arguments in the hunting territories debates from 1915 to 1939. Through an examination of these debates and the sequence of the published arguments I provide new insights into how these representations of Aboriginal territoriality developed and the professional circumstances that shaped Frank Speck's contributions to these discussions. As one of the first generation of professionally trained anthropologists to contribute to the formation of anthropology as a professional university discipline in Canada and the United States, Frank Speck was also one of the first professionally trained, university-educated anthropologists to work with Aboriginal peoples in the northeastern United States and Canada. He not only established the anthropology department at the University of Pennsylvania in 1912, but he also contributed extensively to the promotion of Aboriginal land and resource rights via on-the-ground advocacy work and through the more than one hundred academic papers and monographs he published across a wide variety of disciplines. For almost a century the nuances of Speck's anthropological practices and contributions to the anthropological canon have been eclipsed by academic debates regarding the validity of the family hunting territory complex. Although the debate initially began in 1925 when Diamond Jenness contested Speck's characterization of family hunting territories, [End Page 170] these arguments were further strengthened by Eleanor Leacock (1954) in the 1950s. In her PhD thesis and later in her seminal article, The Montagnais 'Hunting Territory' and the Fur Trade (1954), Leacock provided ethnographic material from the north shore of the St. Lawrence that supported Jenness's critique of Speck's work. She argued that family hunting territories were not Aboriginal but a product of the European fur trade. Leacock contended that the economic system introduced by the European fur trade established a dependent relationship between Aboriginal peoples and the fur companies. This in turn contributed to the transformation of Aboriginal peoples' traditional communalistic modes of production into individualistic systems of land holdings to support increased pressures and competition for resources. Leacock's representation of family hunting territories ultimately suggested that, as producers in the market-dominated fur trade, Aboriginal peoples had become assimilated to a specific European class system within a wider capitalistic mode of production. In support of Speck, and counter to Leacock's argument, Edward S. Rogers (1963) argued, however, that, although family hunting territories were most likely connected to the fur trade, the basic social organization of Aboriginal peoples into family hunting groups was a unique Aboriginal institution. This debate between Leacock and Rogers provided the specific context for the development of the largely polarized family hunting territory debates during the 1970s and 1980s. Anthropologists such as Adrian Tanner (1973, 1979) and Rolf Knight (1965, 1968, 1978), for example, suggested that family hunting territories were expressions and means of reproducing Aboriginal social relations, symbolic meanings, and environmental linkages. More recently, Harvey Feit (2004) suggested that a pre-Columbian origin of Algonquian family hunting territories was in fact plausible. He argued that the ethnohistorical record indicates that there was a considerable continuity of traditional Algonquian land and resource use practices throughout the precontact and contact period. He points out, however, that scholars often cite the frequency of reports of game depletion by colonial and Hudson's Bay Company (hereafter HBC) officials as evidence against the existence of early hunting territories and aboriginal game conservation. According to Feit, one way to address this issue is to accept the idea that serious game depletions and shortages were a normal condition in which aboriginal territoriality and conservation were developed and adopted. Part of this includes examining whether conditions..." @default.
• W2043297575 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2043297575 creator A5005343760 @default.
• W2043297575 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2043297575 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2043297575 title "A Redirection in Neo-Evolutionism?: A Retrospective Examination of the Algonquian Family Hunting Territories Debates" @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1480651196 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1496072289 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1508522130 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1531347886 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1553439135 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1558442170 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1587673522 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1599571668 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1906508777 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1971122710 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1972918805 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1973641129 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1974277038 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1987721249 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1990632472 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W1999582886 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2000855611 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2002413703 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2005192023 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2007183011 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2009005297 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2013685796 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2027698036 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2029718173 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2039406596 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2039880661 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2047107347 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2050302148 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2052205842 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W207821921 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2080873238 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2083444058 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2087961418 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2093609171 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2095724883 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2106488061 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2108393520 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2111634485 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2117801634 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2144113404 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2155258383 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2161909058 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2314186255 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2325090742 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2327384874 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2332185947 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2802407896 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2918056519 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2942796245 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W2946873962 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W3130652523 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W3149925164 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W359580732 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W372220827 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W576217450 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W588864809 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W597329588 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W637517448 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W637940415 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W646455380 @default.
• W2043297575 cites W648748273 @default.
• W2043297575 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/haa.2011.0003" @default.
• W2043297575 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2043297575 type Work @default.
• W2043297575 sameAs 2043297575 @default.
• W2043297575 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2043297575 countsByYear W20432975752018 @default.
• W2043297575 countsByYear W20432975752020 @default.
• W2043297575 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2043297575 hasAuthorship W2043297575A5005343760 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C144348335 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C188162584 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C2549261 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConcept C2778159023 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C111472728 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C138885662 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C144024400 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C144348335 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C188162584 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C19165224 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C2549261 @default.
• W2043297575 hasConceptScore W2043297575C2778159023 @default.
• W2043297575 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2043297575 hasLocation W20432975751 @default.
• W2043297575 hasOpenAccess W2043297575 @default.
• W2043297575 hasPrimaryLocation W20432975751 @default.
• W2043297575 hasRelatedWork W1566821434 @default.
• W2043297575 hasRelatedWork W1597787228 @default.

• next