FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2043669882> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2043669882 endingPage "812" @default.
• W2043669882 startingPage "809" @default.
• W2043669882 abstract "There are many types of bone grafts used for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction. One is cranial bone, which has been commonly used as a graft for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Psillakis et al 1 Psillakis J.M. Grotting J.C. Casanova R. et al. Vascularized outer-table calvarial bone flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986; 78: 309 Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar reported that the average thickness of the parietal area was 5 mm (range 4-6 mm), while the study of Jung et al 2 Jung Y.S. Kim H.J. Choi S.W. et al. Regional thickness of parietal bone in Korean adults. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32: 638 Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar found the range of the parietal thickness from 5.037 to 7.169 mm. It is believed that this difference could be derived from racial variance. 2 Jung Y.S. Kim H.J. Choi S.W. et al. Regional thickness of parietal bone in Korean adults. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32: 638 Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar , 3 Adeloye A. Kattan K.R. Silverman F.N. Thickness of the normal skull in the American blacks and whites. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975; 43: 23 Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar , 4 Ross M.D. Lee K.A. Castle W.M. Skull thickness of Black and White races. S Afr Med J. 1976; 50: 635 PubMed Google Scholar Zins and Whitaker 5 Zins J.E. Whitaker L.A. Membranous versus endochondral bone: Implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983; 72: 778 Crossref PubMed Scopus (505) Google Scholar reported that membranous grafts showed significantly greater maintenance of bone volume than endochondral grafts in an animal study, which supported the study of Smith and Abramson. 6 Smith J.D. Abramson M. Membranous vs endochondrial bone autografts. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974; 99: 203 Crossref PubMed Scopus (293) Google Scholar Donovan et al 7 Donovan M.G. Dickerson N.C. Hanson L.J. et al. Maxillary and mandibular reconstruction using calvarial bone grafts and Branemark implants: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 52: 588 Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar reported the successful use of calvarial bone grafts and implants. The volume reduction of iliac crest bone transplants range from 47% to 49.5% in 0.5 to 1 year. 8 Donovan M.G. Dickerson N.C. Hellstein J.W. et al. Autologous calvarial and iliac onlay bone grafts in miniature swine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 51: 898 Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar , 9 Johansson B. Grepe A. Wannfors K. et al. A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001; 30: 157 Crossref PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar In an animal study in miniature swine 8 Donovan M.G. Dickerson N.C. Hellstein J.W. et al. Autologous calvarial and iliac onlay bone grafts in miniature swine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 51: 898 Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar the resorption of calvarial bone was less than that of iliac bone. However, there is no experimental study in the human that compares the resorption of iliac with calvarial bone grafts. Iizuka et al 10 Iizuka T. Smolka W. Hallermann W. et al. Extensive augmentation of the alveolar ridge using autogenous calvarial split bone grafts for dental rehabilitation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 607 Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar compared human calvarial bone transplant in similar follow-up periods with other studies. 11 Adell R. Lekholm U. Grondahl K. et al. Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 233 PubMed Google Scholar , 12 Nystrom E. Legrell P.E. Forssell A. et al. Combined use of bone grafts and implants in the severely resorbed maxilla Postoperative evaluation by computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 24: 20 Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar They reported that the bone resorption of calvarial bone graft was significantly less than iliac crest bone. Patients with severe maxillary atrophy are often beyond simple outpatient ridge augmentation and preparation for implants. Maxillary onlay bone grafting is indicated primarily when there is severe resorption of the maxillary alveolus that results in the absence of a clinical alveolar ridge and loss of adequate palatal vault form. 13 Baker R.D. Connole P.W. Preprosthetic augmentation grafting—autogenous bone. J Oral Surg. 1977; 35: 541 PubMed Google Scholar The purpose of this article is to report a case of reconstruction of severe maxillary atrophy with cranial bone and osteotomy by a novel method that addresses the 3-dimensional deficiency of the maxilla." @default.
• W2043669882 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2043669882 creator A5040714638 @default.
• W2043669882 creator A5075606940 @default.
• W2043669882 date "2007-04-01" @default.
• W2043669882 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2043669882 title "Reconstruction of Severe Atrophic Maxilla With Inverted “L” Cranial Bone Graft and Osteotomy: A Technical Note" @default.
• W2043669882 cites W168458466 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W1970232470 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W1979597158 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W1988908528 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W1991393442 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W1993189596 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2011219178 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2027276115 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2033083713 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2035233062 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2055303859 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2057693780 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2061505562 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2071866356 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2079270825 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2081974843 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2115655392 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2117454647 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2118037745 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W2413457605 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W4239648739 @default.
• W2043669882 cites W47091165 @default.
• W2043669882 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.060" @default.
• W2043669882 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17368386" @default.
• W2043669882 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2043669882 type Work @default.
• W2043669882 sameAs 2043669882 @default.
• W2043669882 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2043669882 countsByYear W20436698822013 @default.
• W2043669882 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2043669882 hasAuthorship W2043669882A5040714638 @default.
• W2043669882 hasAuthorship W2043669882A5075606940 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C122246415 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C2778885411 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C2779300802 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C2780322005 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C105702510 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C122246415 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C199343813 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C2776389721 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C2778885411 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C2779300802 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C2780322005 @default.
• W2043669882 hasConceptScore W2043669882C71924100 @default.
• W2043669882 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2043669882 hasLocation W20436698821 @default.
• W2043669882 hasLocation W20436698822 @default.
• W2043669882 hasOpenAccess W2043669882 @default.
• W2043669882 hasPrimaryLocation W20436698821 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W1972783187 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W1977644819 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W2026954877 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W2081828051 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W2086790139 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W2255031497 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W2553494053 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W2610662188 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W59941695 @default.
• W2043669882 hasRelatedWork W3152707524 @default.
• W2043669882 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W2043669882 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2043669882 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2043669882 magId "2043669882" @default.
• W2043669882 workType "article" @default.