FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2044746929> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2044746929 endingPage "499" @default.
• W2044746929 startingPage "489" @default.
• W2044746929 abstract "The persistence of pesticides in the environment and their effects are a cause of concern to more and more people, and so in 2009 the French government announced plans to reduce pesticide use in agriculture over the next 10 years. Water managers are to monitor the beneficial impact of this reduction on aquatic environments. It has been suggested that diatoms may be good indicators of pesticides, and more particularly of herbicides, in water. Diatoms have been routinely used to assess organic and nutrient pollution for more than 10 years. The general approach is to develop a diatom-based tool to assess pesticide contamination. Diatom indices are usually based on specific pollution sensitivity. Other metrics, such as life-forms, ecological guilds, or cell size offer other advantages. For instance, the relationships between trends in these metrics and environmental gradients are more robust, and make it easier to establish ecological hypotheses. We have therefore opted for this approach. To develop such a tool, outdoor, lotic mesocosm experiments lasting about 2 months were conducted from 2006 to 2008. Herbicides (diuron) and fungicides (azoxystrobin, tebuconazole) were tested at environmental concentrations (sum of pesticides concentrations from 1.11 to 3.01 μg L−1 for chronic pollutions and from 20.25 to 29.50 μg L−1 for short-term acute pollutions). Diatom communities in artificial channels were analyzed by light microscopy using standard European methods. The various parameters structuring diatom communities were assessed, and colonization time appeared to be the most important. However, pesticide contamination was the second most important, and had a more significant impact on the composition of ecological guilds than on species composition. Some metrics did not display any significant trends (benthic/planktonic, colonial, pedunculate, pioneer), but others looked promising for use in pesticide contamination assessment: the abundances of motile guild, low-profile guild and mucous tubule diatoms all increased in contaminated channels, whereas high-profile diatoms showed the opposite trend. Some possible explanations, such as a protective effect of the exopolysaccharide matrix, can be advanced: diatoms living inside a mucous tubule may be shielded from dissolved pesticides, as are motile diatoms, which have a micro-habitat preference for thick matrices which also allows them to withstand higher levels of water contamination. In the same way, high-profile guild diatoms are exposed to dissolved pesticides to a greater extent, and this could explain their lower abundance in contaminated channels." @default.
• W2044746929 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2044746929 creator A5001950876 @default.
• W2044746929 creator A5075196036 @default.
• W2044746929 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2044746929 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2044746929 title "Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pesticide contamination in rivers: Lotic mesocosm approaches" @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1252436473 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1506800821 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1571698813 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1947370275 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1964113791 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1965883875 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1968349908 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1972186308 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1973741303 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1974820625 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1987625791 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1988456071 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1991285011 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1992397191 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1993790988 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1993829711 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W1993879457 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2003906907 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2004290646 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2005524877 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2008618516 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2013758302 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2016247685 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2023143625 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2024293394 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2024830654 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2029884264 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2039047427 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2040834744 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2041408751 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2048648115 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2051989083 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2053288491 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2055925358 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2059703953 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2061704683 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2062752196 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2072120329 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2078204063 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2087671499 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2089965439 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2090143988 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2090168979 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2091842454 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2092046189 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2094649010 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2102592947 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2111633697 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2113922504 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2118918361 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2125603952 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2153085302 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2164128117 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W2406597027 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W285270278 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W4237453592 @default.
• W2044746929 cites W4250340689 @default.
• W2044746929 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.07.004" @default.
• W2044746929 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2044746929 type Work @default.
• W2044746929 sameAs 2044746929 @default.
• W2044746929 citedByCount "106" @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292012 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292013 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292014 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292015 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292016 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292017 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292018 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292019 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292020 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292021 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292022 @default.
• W2044746929 countsByYear W20447469292023 @default.
• W2044746929 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2044746929 hasAuthorship W2044746929A5001950876 @default.
• W2044746929 hasAuthorship W2044746929A5075196036 @default.
• W2044746929 hasBestOaLocation W20447469292 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C142796444 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C161176658 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C180553826 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C2778226232 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C2778902744 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C29730261 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C46797941 @default.
• W2044746929 hasConcept C521259446 @default.

• next