FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2044891567> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2044891567 endingPage "37" @default.
• W2044891567 startingPage "25" @default.
• W2044891567 abstract "Developing History/Historicizing Development in Mexican Nuevo Cine Manifestoes around “la Crisis” Scott L. Baugh (bio) National characterizations of Mexico historically involve periodic crises. Conceptions of Mexican crisis across economic, political, and social contexts deserve critical attention, especially as they configure national identities. Connotations of crisis abound, from rationalism's passage to knowledge and theology's wrestle with faith, to the paroxysm of a disease that leads to recovery or final collapse, to the event that drives a character to the climax and consequential denouement in a narrative; significantly, these ideas all involve an established process that, in the moment of crisis, is jeopardized and, in the moment of correction, is ratified and, epistemologically, becomes knowledge more firmly engrained in the collective.1 The uses of the term with respect to Mexico's economic history are too numerable to note, but generally they replicate these connotations, whereby an economic system is determined and applied. From an enfranchised viewpoint, crisis appears as a malfunction in systemic operations, an interruption to the ordained and fundamental process, necessarily eliciting angst over the uncertainty of the outcome for sharers who strive for stability. In the years following World War II, studies of underdevelopment in Mexico and other parts of Latin America prescribe modern progress through Westernized industrial growth. Put concretely: virtually every aspect of the Mexican strategy for development...tends to further enmesh the country in a net of dependent relationships with multi-national corporations, with private American investors, with official U.S. banking institutions, and with American-dominated international bodies like the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund (Hellman 72-3). Coincidentally, the technocracy associated with the classic Hollywood aesthetic and with U.S. multi-national corporate-studios continues pushing across the Americas and the globe. Quality plummeted but production increased in Mexican cinema, remarks Carl Mora (99). Through a combination of protectionist laws, exhibition quotas, a state monopoly, stereotypical representations, and studio organization that denies technical and aesthetic innovation, Mexican cinema has become a little big-industry in the world marketplace, according to Alberto Ruy Sánchez (46, 61). Pointedly, Charles Ramírez Berg outlines Mexican cinema's dependence on Hollywood, the political economy of Mexican cinema, and the growing crisis throughout the state due to the lack of quality filmmaking in the 1960s (37). Given conjectures of crises, Mexican cinema of the 1960s, coinciding with unparalleled economic gains, the rise of the counter-culture, la Onda, a renewal of social activism, and a heightened sense of democracy, deserves closer examination. Particular constituents of Mexican cinema from the 1960s, the self-proclaimed Grupo del Nuevo Cine or Mexican New Cinema Group, address questions of Mexican crisis from a position of disenfranchisement, deconstructing Mexico's institutional structures and the ideologies correlative to them. The group's manifesto documents, theoretical and descriptive statements made by the filmmakers-cultural activists themselves, like their independent film productions, recognize the intersection of economy, politics, art, and community through their remonstrations of dependence. The solutions the Nuevo Cine Group proposes in these statements revolve around various embodiments of independence, fostering a democratic impulse in Mexican culture. Histories of Mexico tend to overlook the importance of the early-1960s in favor of the tumultuous decade's end and the Echeverría sexenio, marking 1940 to 1970 a miraculous industrial period and 1970 as a search for renewed stability;2 many cultural histories follow this periodization.3 General film histories, including Kristin Thompson and David Bordwell's Film History: An Introduction and David A. Cook's A History of Narrative Film, circumscribe Mexican independent filmmaking to this post-1970 period (Cook 798; Thompson 638). More disarming, several studies of Latin American and Mexican cinema ignore the significance of the Nuevo Cine's formative period, from 1960 to 1965, in favor of the post-1970 independent movements (García Tsao; Elena 4-6; Costa; Gustavo García; Hershfield 193). As John King insightfully claims, the Nuevo Cine Group arises in the late 1950s amid a climate of uneven developmentalism and modernization (132). In the formulation of this group, according to Ramírez Berg, Mora, and Tomás Pérez Turrent, is the spark [End Page 25] that electrifies the independent..." @default.
• W2044891567 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2044891567 creator A5026666625 @default.
• W2044891567 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W2044891567 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2044891567 title "Developing History/Historicizing Development in Mexican Nuevo Cine Manifestoes around &quot;la Crisis&quot;" @default.
• W2044891567 cites W136084096 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1516126499 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1522155586 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1542915826 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1555812111 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1560360669 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1581666603 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1590006076 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1595842550 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1969846798 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1992201715 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1999490563 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2015486210 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2016629816 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2030668508 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2060973012 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2066992792 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2068915755 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2074128864 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2075725449 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2078366059 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2081622547 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2085098923 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2113407138 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2138810436 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2140952137 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2156280884 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2162301651 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2171366876 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2234301289 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2324686461 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2328272300 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2620021104 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2798377203 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2806988935 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W2917417480 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W3012254656 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W3048633891 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W3151368657 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W418707038 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W573883826 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W579665445 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W598336755 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W605756171 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W610031100 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W619958899 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W622661705 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W631530378 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W650186676 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W657709709 @default.
• W2044891567 cites W1489349552 @default.
• W2044891567 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/flm.2004.0034" @default.
• W2044891567 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2044891567 type Work @default.
• W2044891567 sameAs 2044891567 @default.
• W2044891567 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2044891567 countsByYear W20448915672014 @default.
• W2044891567 countsByYear W20448915672018 @default.
• W2044891567 countsByYear W20448915672019 @default.
• W2044891567 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2044891567 hasAuthorship W2044891567A5026666625 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C2778692574 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C6303427 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C138885662 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C138921699 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C144024400 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C17744445 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C199033989 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C199539241 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C27206212 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C2778692574 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C41895202 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C6303427 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C94625758 @default.
• W2044891567 hasConceptScore W2044891567C95457728 @default.
• W2044891567 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2044891567 hasLocation W20448915671 @default.
• W2044891567 hasOpenAccess W2044891567 @default.
• W2044891567 hasPrimaryLocation W20448915671 @default.
• W2044891567 hasRelatedWork W1964809462 @default.
• W2044891567 hasRelatedWork W2127624799 @default.
• W2044891567 hasRelatedWork W2139589370 @default.

• next