FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2044892116> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2044892116 endingPage "S52" @default.
• W2044892116 startingPage "S51" @default.
• W2044892116 abstract "Purpose Despite increased emphasis on cosmetic outcomes of hypospadias surgery, few reports objectively determine appearance. Furthermore, prior studies demonstrate patient and surgeon assessments may vary significantly. We used a standardized questionnaire to survey parent and surgeon perception after TIP repair. Material and methods A Likert scale questionnaire (responses from 1, very abnormal, to 5, normal) was developed concerning 6 items: overall penile appearance, cosmesis of meatus and skin, penile size, straightness, and voided stream. Parents and surgeon independently completed surveys 6 weeks after primary TIP repair; similar surveys after circumcision provided normal controls. Maximum score was 30. Results Hypospadias patients comprised 50 distal and 15 midshaft to scrotal TIP repairs. There were 22 circumcision controls. Mean score by parents for hypospadias repair was 28 +/- 3, compared to 27.7 +/- 3 after circumcision. Questions regarding straight erection and voided stream were not answered by the surgeon in all patients, so comparison between parents and surgeon were based on the other 4 parameters with a maximum score of 20. Parents of patients and controls scored 18.3 +/-2 and 17.6 +/- 3, respectively, versus surgeon scores of 18.9 +/- 2 and 18.6 +/-2. Pearson's test showed statistically significant agreement and the correlation coefficient between parents and surgeon was 0.6 and 0.5 for controls and hypospadias repairs, respectively. There were no differences in evaluations for distal versus proximal hypospadias surgery. Conclusions Parents and surgeon agree TIP results in penile appearance are indistinguishable from normal circumcised penis. Similar surveys should be performed after alternative repairs. Despite increased emphasis on cosmetic outcomes of hypospadias surgery, few reports objectively determine appearance. Furthermore, prior studies demonstrate patient and surgeon assessments may vary significantly. We used a standardized questionnaire to survey parent and surgeon perception after TIP repair. A Likert scale questionnaire (responses from 1, very abnormal, to 5, normal) was developed concerning 6 items: overall penile appearance, cosmesis of meatus and skin, penile size, straightness, and voided stream. Parents and surgeon independently completed surveys 6 weeks after primary TIP repair; similar surveys after circumcision provided normal controls. Maximum score was 30. Hypospadias patients comprised 50 distal and 15 midshaft to scrotal TIP repairs. There were 22 circumcision controls. Mean score by parents for hypospadias repair was 28 +/- 3, compared to 27.7 +/- 3 after circumcision. Questions regarding straight erection and voided stream were not answered by the surgeon in all patients, so comparison between parents and surgeon were based on the other 4 parameters with a maximum score of 20. Parents of patients and controls scored 18.3 +/-2 and 17.6 +/- 3, respectively, versus surgeon scores of 18.9 +/- 2 and 18.6 +/-2. Pearson's test showed statistically significant agreement and the correlation coefficient between parents and surgeon was 0.6 and 0.5 for controls and hypospadias repairs, respectively. There were no differences in evaluations for distal versus proximal hypospadias surgery. Parents and surgeon agree TIP results in penile appearance are indistinguishable from normal circumcised penis. Similar surveys should be performed after alternative repairs." @default.
• W2044892116 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2044892116 creator A5061340239 @default.
• W2044892116 creator A5071350449 @default.
• W2044892116 creator A5084082272 @default.
• W2044892116 creator A5086007714 @default.
• W2044892116 date "2007-04-01" @default.
• W2044892116 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2044892116 title "Patient and surgeon evaluation of outcome in hypospadias repair" @default.
• W2044892116 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.01.084" @default.
• W2044892116 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2044892116 type Work @default.
• W2044892116 sameAs 2044892116 @default.
• W2044892116 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2044892116 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2044892116 hasAuthorship W2044892116A5061340239 @default.
• W2044892116 hasAuthorship W2044892116A5071350449 @default.
• W2044892116 hasAuthorship W2044892116A5084082272 @default.
• W2044892116 hasAuthorship W2044892116A5086007714 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConcept C2777493422 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConcept C2777786686 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConcept C2777990738 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConcept C2780943399 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConceptScore W2044892116C141071460 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConceptScore W2044892116C2777493422 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConceptScore W2044892116C2777786686 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConceptScore W2044892116C2777990738 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConceptScore W2044892116C2780943399 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConceptScore W2044892116C61434518 @default.
• W2044892116 hasConceptScore W2044892116C71924100 @default.
• W2044892116 hasLocation W20448921161 @default.
• W2044892116 hasOpenAccess W2044892116 @default.
• W2044892116 hasPrimaryLocation W20448921161 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2007448431 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2009871353 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2051401567 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2058379080 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2134842899 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2151775039 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2331788986 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W2796391091 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W3195252529 @default.
• W2044892116 hasRelatedWork W4225141702 @default.
• W2044892116 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2044892116 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2044892116 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2044892116 magId "2044892116" @default.
• W2044892116 workType "article" @default.