FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2044977826> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2044977826 endingPage "393" @default.
• W2044977826 startingPage "389" @default.
• W2044977826 abstract "Background: This study evaluated in a randomized, prospective manner the possible differences in operative time, postoperative pain and analgesic requirement, early complications, time off-work and patient satisfaction between patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy using the electrocautery (ECH), UltraShears (ultrasonically activated scalpel; USH) or stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH). Methods: Patients with symptomatic third-degree or fourth-degree haemorrhoids were randomized into one of the three groups: ECH, SH (PPH stapler; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA) or USH groups. The operative times and complications, if any, were recorded. An identical anaesthetic technique was used for all patients, and postoperative analgesia was also standardized according to the pain scores. Pain was evaluated preoperatively and at 8 and 24 h and 2, 7, 14 and 28 days, postoperatively, by means of a visual analogue scale. The numbers of narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics used, the time required for full return to daily activities and the incontinence scores at 4 months postoperatively were evaluated, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: No significant differences with respect to age or sex existed between the three groups, each consisting of 20 patients. USH was significantly faster than both ECH and SH (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons) in operation time, and SH was faster than ECH (P < 0.0001). Comparing any two groups, the mean pain scores in the ECH group were significantly higher than in the SH and USH groups at postoperative 8 and 24 h, and day 2, but the groups reached comparable pain scores at day 7, 14 and 28. The numbers of narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics used in the ECH group were significantly higher than in the SH and USH groups (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). The early postoperative complication rate was higher in the ECH group (25%), compared with the SH (P = 0.017) and USH (P < 0.0001) groups. Only 12 patients (60%) in the ECH group could be discharged within the first postoperative 24 h, whereas all of the patients (100%) in the SH and 17 patients (85%) in the USH groups could be treated as day cases. The time required for full return to daily activities was similar in the SH and USH groups (P = 0.841), but it was significantly longer in the ECH group (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The 70% patient satisfaction rate in the ECH group was significantly lower than in the SH (95%; P = 0.008) and the USH (100%, P = 0.002) groups. Conclusion: Our short-term results have shown that SH and ultrasonic dissector haemorrhoidectomies were superior to ECH haemorrhoidectomy, in terms of surgical utility, postoperative pain, analgesic intake, time off-work and patient satisfaction. Some advantages of USH over SH also appeared." @default.
• W2044977826 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2044977826 creator A5001306609 @default.
• W2044977826 creator A5029203572 @default.
• W2044977826 creator A5061211607 @default.
• W2044977826 creator A5074099890 @default.
• W2044977826 date "2008-05-01" @default.
• W2044977826 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2044977826 title "HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY WITH ELECTROCAUTERY OR ULTRASHEARS AND STAPLED HAEMORRHOIDOPEXY" @default.
• W2044977826 cites W1967787832 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W1972382724 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W1975007450 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W1976344508 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W1979931519 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W1980072919 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2004690058 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2005507769 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2009311875 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2013680666 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2016550207 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2020267515 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2033584817 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2067358139 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2073193469 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2089583123 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2110727591 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2113690538 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2117300470 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2121471533 @default.
• W2044977826 cites W2135844912 @default.
• W2044977826 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04483.x" @default.
• W2044977826 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18380739" @default.
• W2044977826 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2044977826 type Work @default.
• W2044977826 sameAs 2044977826 @default.
• W2044977826 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2044977826 countsByYear W20449778262012 @default.
• W2044977826 countsByYear W20449778262015 @default.
• W2044977826 countsByYear W20449778262020 @default.
• W2044977826 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2044977826 hasAuthorship W2044977826A5001306609 @default.
• W2044977826 hasAuthorship W2044977826A5029203572 @default.
• W2044977826 hasAuthorship W2044977826A5061211607 @default.
• W2044977826 hasAuthorship W2044977826A5074099890 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C2775849661 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C2992669165 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C141071460 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C14184104 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C168563851 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C188816634 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C2775849661 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C2775944032 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C2780820201 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C2992669165 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C42219234 @default.
• W2044977826 hasConceptScore W2044977826C71924100 @default.
• W2044977826 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2044977826 hasLocation W20449778261 @default.
• W2044977826 hasLocation W20449778262 @default.
• W2044977826 hasOpenAccess W2044977826 @default.
• W2044977826 hasPrimaryLocation W20449778261 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W12774522 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2013575488 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2018290871 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2026252243 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2034503869 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2044977826 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2160450992 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2418316097 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2432366219 @default.
• W2044977826 hasRelatedWork W2501922920 @default.
• W2044977826 hasVolume "78" @default.
• W2044977826 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2044977826 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2044977826 magId "2044977826" @default.
• W2044977826 workType "article" @default.